Newsletter 2009 - Supplement Research
Update Newsletter 2009 by Ray Sahelian, M.D.
See
Newsletter
2008 back issues.
Emails from newsletter readers
I recently subscribed to your e-mail newsletter, and I am very happy to
have your calm, common sense information.
I really like your newsletter. I've been paying attention to my diet since I was 20, when I got pregnant with my first child. Your advice is the most sensible I've run across in years. Thank you.
Thank You for your newsletter. I find the information interesting. With new information coming out every day about nutrition and supplements it makes it difficult at times to keep up. I consider you one of the primary newsletters for factual information. I don't always agree but you do give sound advice. Thanks for your devotion.
I am a regular reader of your newsletter. Dr. Sahelian's website and his balanced views on supplements is one of the few i have seen in Alternative healthcare industry . The best thing is he mentions the Scientific Double blind studies for the Herbs / supplements on the site which makes the customer make an educated trial on their usage.
===================================
SUPPLEMENT RESEARCH UPDATE - by Ray Sahelian, M.D.
Vol. 6, Issue 13 -- December, 2009
===================================
In the last issue of the newsletter I mentioned my
thoughts on vitamin D supplementation and that I believed many people
would benefit from supplementation but some people
may potentially be taking too high a dosage when the scientific evidence
is still too early to recommend daily amounts greater than 2000 units for
long term use, such as years and decades. Most of the emails we received were appreciative that I
was taking a cautious approach. But there were a few people who felt my
suggestions were too cautious. For instance, one person said that he was
taking 5000 units a day based on the recommendation of his doctor and the fact
that his doctor wanted to give him enough of the vitamin to maintain a
very high blood level. I wonder about the logic of this kind of thinking.
What evidence do we have that maintaining an excessively high blood level of vitamin
D by taking thousands of units a day will lead to a longer life? As of
November 2009 I cannot tell anyone for certain what the ideal daily
intake of the vitamin should be nor what the ideal blood level should be.
Perhaps taking several thousands units a day is a good thing. But then
again we may find out years later of unexpected consequences that we are
currently unaware of. It's up to you on how much you want to take. For
the time being I prefer to stay on the 400 to 1000 unit dosage range as
explained in detail in the previous newsletter. More on this issue
later.
There were some interesting recommendations recently
regarding new guidelines for mammogram testing that I review below.
At what age should you get a
mammogram?
New guidelines were issued by the United States Preventive Services Task
Force USPSTF whose position influences coverage of screening tests by
Medicare and many insurance companies. The government panel of
independent doctors and scientists concluded that getting screened for
breast cancer early and often is harmful, causing too many false alarms
and unneeded biopsies without substantially improving women's chances of
surviving the disease. The guidelines are for the general population,
not those at high risk of breast cancer because of family history or
other reasons. The new guidelines say:
Most women in their 40s should not routinely get mammograms. Starting
mammograms at age 40 would prevent one additional death but also lead to
470 false alarms for every 1,000 women screened. For each case of cancer
death prevented among younger women, 1,900 women must be screened. These
new guidelines spare women the worry of false alarms and the cost and
trouble of extra tests. The USPSTF 's last recommendations in 2002
called for routine mammograms every one to two years for all women older
than 40.
Women 50 to 74 should get a mammogram every other year until they turn
75, after which the risks and benefits are not well known. For each case
of cancer death prevented among women 50 to 59 years old, 1,300 must be
screened. The ratio drops to 1 for 377 for women 60 to 69 years old. The
panel said there is not enough evidence to say women over 74 benefit
from mammograms because at that age screening may be detecting cancers
but the cause of death is more likely to be from heart disease or other
causes of old age.
The USPSTF also said the value of breast exams by doctors is unknown.
And breast self-exams are of no value. That means women can stop
routinely checking their breasts for lumps.
These new guidelines were quickly challenged by the American Cancer
Society. "This is one screening test I recommend unequivocally, and
would recommend to any woman 40 and over," the society's chief medical
officer, Dr. Otis Brawley, said in a statement. Dr Len Lichtenfeld,
deputy chief medical officer of the American Cancer Society, said the
group will not change recommendations for routine mammograms for women
starting at age 40.
Dr W. Phil Evans, president of the Society of Breast Imaging, said
"The USPSTF recommendations are a step backward and represent a
significant harm to women's health.". The website of the Society of
Breast Imaging says: "Today, published in the Annals of Internal
Medicine, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommended radical
changes in the clinical guidelines for screening mammography. These
include: Screening mammography should not be done routinely for all
women age 40-49 years. Women aged 50-74 years should have mammography
every two years. There is not enough evidence to recommend for or
against screening mammography after age 74 years. The Society of Breast
Imaging and the American College of Radiology, the American Cancer
Society, and many other respected professional organizations, will voice
strong opposition to these proposed changes. It is the opinion of your
SBI leadership that adopting these guidelines would result in a major
step backward in women's healthcare and increased deaths from breast
cancer. "
Comments: I think too many tests are done in this country sometimes without adequate proof that these mammograms, blood tests, x-rays, invasive procedures, etc., prolong life. I tend to agree with the recommendations by the USPSTF. It is interesting that the groups and organizations who oppose these new guidelines are most likely to be, directly or indirectly, financially hurt by fewer mammograms being performed. Therefore, when you listen to advice on television, newspapers or on the internet, keep in mind whether the person giving such advice has any financial ties to such testing. I trust the advice of the USPSTF more than I trust the advice of the American Cancer Society or the Society of Breast Imaging. By the way, international guidelines also call for screening to start at age 50; the World Health Organization recommends the test every two years, Britain says every three years. Annals of Internal Medicine, November 17, 2009. See http://www.raysahelian.com/breastcancer.html
Vitamin D deficiency leads to
increased cardiovascular disease risk
Low intake of vitamin D, increases a person's risk of stroke, heart
disease and even mortality. Examining 27,686 Utah patients aged 50 or
older with no history of cardiovascular disease, a study by the Heart
Institute at the Intermountain Medical Center in Salt Lake City found
those with very low vitamin D levels were much more likely to die early
than those with normal levels, more likely to develop coronary artery
disease and more likely to have a stroke. Studies have shown that
vitamin D also helps regulated key body functions such as blood
pressure, inflammation and glucose control and that deficiency of the
vitamin is associated with musculoskeletal disorders. Brent Muhlestein,
director of cardiovascular research at Intermountain, noted that because
the study was only observational, definitive links between vitamin D
deficiency and heart disease could not be established. The researchers
chose Utah in part because the population consumes low levels of tobacco
and alcohol, thus allowing them to focus the study on vitamin D's
effects on the cardiovascular system. The patients were divided into
three groups based on their vitamin D levels -- normal (over 30
nanograms per milliliter), low (15-30 ng/ml) or very low (less than 15
ng/ml) -- and were followed for a year to determine whether they
developed some form of heart disease.
Comments: This study does not address the issue whether
taking vitamin D supplements that put a person at a greater than 30
nanograms per milliter range offers any additional benefits, or causes
potential harm. As I mentioned in the previous newsletter, I don't think
most people need to get their vitamin D level tested. Taking 400 to 800
units a day should be fine for most people without incurring the expense
and inconvenience of getting vitamin D levels checked on a regular
basis. See
http://www.raysahelian.com/vitamind.html
Emails
The vitamin D dosage controversy
Q. I am sure you realize those on the opposite side of
the fence claim that the tiny amounts of vitamin D currently
recommended in the RDAs are adequate only to prevent rickets. While,
they say, there is other serious evidence which demonstrates that
appreciably larger intakes are necessary to prevent quite a few other
very serious health issues. They also point out that people taking even
much larger amounts than 4000 IUs daily have serum levels that are
nowhere remotely close to those that have been found to represent
toxicity. I am truly open-minded about this, and am very happy to listen
to evidence on both sides.
A. Those who advocate large dosage use of vitamin
D, such as more thank 2000 units a day, are the ones who are responsible
in providing evidence of safety over years and decades of use and they
need to provide evidence that longevity is increased by such
supplementation. Thus far there are no studies to show whether the
general population in the United States would be better off ingesting
several thousand units of this vitamin. There are no long term studies
that indicate that having a very high blood level of vitamin D, beyond
the high normal range, will
make you live longer. There are studies that indicate low vitamin D
levels are associated with a higher incidence of stroke, heart disease,
and increased mortality. A reasonable and cautious medical doctor or
scientist does not make haphazard and careless recommendations of high
dose supplement use without adequate evidence of long term safety. There
are countless dietary supplements that have shown to have a positive
role to play in improving health, at least in the short term. If you
read all these enthusiastic reports on certain websites you will end up
being convinced that you need to take dozens or hundreds of vitamins,
nutrients, and various herbs, fruit and vegetable extracts, amino acids,
hormones, etc in high dosages. Not only is this expensive, but we have
no idea of all the interactions that could occur, positive or negative.
Fish oil and vitamin E
Q. I had one question on fish oil. How much vitamin E
is needed with omega-3 at doses of 1500-2000mg EPA / DHA, such as 5 or 6
softgels daily. There are
many different recommendations by health experts ranging from as low as
30IU to 800 IU of vitamin E. What would be the dose which is effective
but not problematic to health in long term since more is not necessarily
good.
The dosage of vitamin E as an antioxidant to protect fish oil
fatty acids such as EPA and DHA is not fully known but does not appear
to be high. Even 5 to 10 units should be sufficient and 30 units is
plenty.
http://www.raysahelian.com/vitamine.html
Older people and lesser dosage
Q. On a website it says if over the age of 50, limit
Diet Rx pills to one or two a day instead of 3 or 4. Why? What does age have to do with
dosage?
A. As a general rule, older individuals usually have a poorer liver
metabolism, poorer kidney function, weaker heart, are more likely to be
on prescribed medications and can be more sensitive to herbal products
and pharmaceutical drugs. Therefore, to be cautious, it is best that
older individuals take medicines and supplements in lower dosages.
===================================
SUPPLEMENT RESEARCH UPDATE - by Ray Sahelian, M.D.
Vol. 6, Issue 12 -- November, 2009
===================================
The topic of vitamin D has come up a lot lately in the news media and
I've had many people ask my opinion regarding supplementation. We've had
many emails from readers informing us that their doctors are
recommending daily dosages of 1000 units or higher. From the research
evidence I have read thus far, it does appear that many people in this
country are not getting enough of this vitamin. But what is the right
dosage for supplementation? Is it 400, 1000, or 2000 units? A close
friend of mine, who is a broker for a supplement company, informed me
that the company she represents is heavily promoting a 5000 unit pill
which is selling quite briskly. Later I discuss the benefits and risks
of supplementation and the necessity or lack thereof of testing for
blood levels.
Let the sun shine
Vitamin D plays an important role in calcium balance and for optimal
skeletal growth and bone strength. The major function of vitamin D is to
improve the efficiency of calcium absorption from the small intestine.
Epidemiological data show low levels of vitamin D lead to a higher
incidence of breast cancer, colon cancer, prostate cancer, ovarian
cancer, as well as multiple myeloma. Patients with Crohn's disease are
known to have low levels. Vitamin D supplementation may even decrease
symptoms of depression during the winter months.
Few people now question the importance of this vitamin, and with
the benefits being touted in the media many consumers, and doctors, now
think that the more they take the healthier they will be. I want to
caution you of the danger regarding excessive intake. Vitamin D taken in
high amounts can cause excessive calcification of bone, calcification of
soft tissue, kidney stones, headaches, weakness, nausea, and vomiting.
Are there currently unknown long term effects of high dose daily use?
Bottom line: Some people may not need to supplement since their
diet includes plenty of the vitamin and they get a lot of sun exposure.
Most people may benefit from taking 400 units a day either as a pill or
as part of their multivitamin product (in addition to their diet and
some sun exposure which could be several hundred units a day). A few
people -- those who do not consume much of this vitamin in their diet,
live in Northern latitudes, or some elderly who get little sun -- may
benefit from taking 600 to 800 units daily. More is needed in the winter
season and less in the summer season. Those who have hardly any sun
exposure, or have certain chronic medical conditions, may temporary need
1000 to 3000 units a day for a few weeks or months and then back to 600
to 1000 units daily. I do not think that the average person with a good
diet and some regular sun exposure needs to take more than 400 to 600
units a day as a supplement. I have received emails from some doctors
who claim I am being too cautious. I would rather err on the side of
taking less until long term studies are published regarding the safety
of supplementing with 1000 units or more taken daily for a decade or
longer. If such studies do get published in the next few years and show
the safety of such high dose supplementation, I will change my
recommendations. At this time I certainly do not think the 2000 and 5000
unit pills being promoted are appropriate for the vast majority of the
population. Could people taking these high dosages end up dying sooner
due to excessive calcification of their blood vessels and soft tissues?
There is some early indication that high dosages of vitamin D could
cause calcification of vessels in the brain leading to cognitive
decline. Could taking high doses of calcium along with these excessive
doses of vitamin D make matters even worse?
As with many natural vitamins and supplements too low a dosage can
be detrimental to health and too high an intake can have adverse
effects.
Do you recommend people being tested for vitamin D
levels before taking a supplement?
Unless a person has an unusual diet or a chronic health condition
that could lead to severe vitamin D deficiency, I don't think testing is
necessary. There are hundreds of blood tests available to check levels
of different vitamins, minerals, amino acids, hormones, cholesterol,
various lipids, inflammation markers, liver studies, kidney studies,
etc., etc.. At some point one has to balance the costs and inconvenience
of testing versus the potential benefits they provide. Unless a person
has an unusual medical condition or diet where blood vitamin D levels
are suspected to be too low or too high, blood testing does not give us
much of a clue on exactly how much to supplement. I am cost conscious
and practical in my approach. I think in this country we are going
overboard in terms of testing, and for the amount of money we spend on
diagnostic testing and health care we are not even close to being one of
the healthiest nations on the planet. We do so many diagnostic tests in
this country without knowing whether people are actually healthier or
live longer as a result of the testing. The people who end up being
better off are doctors and the those who own the labs. I think the vast
majority of people who don't have an unusual diet or serious and chronic
medical condition just take 400 to 800 units a day they should be fine
and they don't have to worry about checking for vitamin D levels.
Animal study: Mucuna herb works as an aphrodisiac
Investigators at the University of Madras in Chennai, India tested the
effects of Mucuna pruriens seed extract on general mating behavior,
libido and potency of normal male rats. The extract administered orally
significantly increased the mounting frequency, intromission frequency
and ejaculation latency, and decreased the mounting latency, and
inter-intromission interval. They say, "Resulting aphrodisiac activity
of the extract lends support to the claim that it has traditionally been
used for the treatment of sexual disorders."
Comments: I have personally found this herb to be useful as
an aphrodisiac. The herbal extract is available as a supplement by
itself, or combined with other aphrodisiac herbs in Passion Rx. See
http://www.raysahelian.com/mucunapruriens.html
Emails
Q. Would you post on your website some info please about what people who
have been close physical proximity with some friends who later on had a
family member diagnosed with swine flu, can and should do? Would you
recommend some other supplement? Are there herbs that treat the swine
flu infection?
A. The best option at this time in terms of prevention or reducing
severity of the swine flu is to maintain an overall healthy immune
system through a good diet, moderate exercise, low stress, and deep
sleep. Washing hands and
being aware of anyone who is sick and keeping a distance is, of course,
quite helpful. I am not aware of any specific herbs or supplements that
have been tested to prevent or cure the swine flu even though many of
these are advertised and promoted on the internet. The immune page can
offer some general suggestions. See
http://www.raysahelian.com/immune.html and
http://www.raysahelian.com/swineflu.html
Q. In regards to your previous issue of the oldest
living person in the world at 113.
He claims he eats breakfast and lunch and not much for dinner and does
not overeat.
Sounds like Walter has been practicing, in large part, calorie
restriction (DR). I understand in the book The CR Way, the authors
suggest modifying the standard CR protocol used in many animal studies
by including of daily fasts -- large breakfast, small lunch, no dinner.
I might also mention my wife's grandmother, who lived to be 107, at very
small portions.
A.
Yes, you make a good point.
Q.
I am looking at your Mind Power Rx supplement and have a question. I
notice in response to questions regarding the taking of multiple herbs
together, Dr. Sahelian often recommends starting with a low dose of one
to see how it affects the person taking it. The mind power supplement
appears to have a combination of many different herbs. I was wondering
what the philosophy is on putting so many herbs into one formulation
when much of the advice on the website is to start small with one or two
herbs. Does combining so many herbs into one formula increase the chance
for side effects or does the fact that each herb is in a lower dose then
normally taken individually mitigate this risk? Is the combination done
to increase the efficacy in a wide group of people since each individual
reacts differently to each of the herbs in the formula and chances are
at least one of the herbs would have the intended effect on someone
taking it?
A.
When I suggest people try one herb or supplement at a time, it assumes
that the product is taken in its full dosage. Mind Power Rx has a
fraction of the content of a particular nutrient or herb. For instance,
the normal dosage of acetyl l carnitine in a capsule is between 250 and
500 mg. The mind formula has only 25 mg. Sometimes the combination of
several herbs and nutrients in small dosages works better than a high
amount of just one, but each person is different in their response and
not all combination formulas work well. Some people may respond better
to one single nutrient as opposed to a combination formula. It's
difficult to predict and the only way to know is through trial and
error.
Q. After taking Eyesight
RX for only 8 weeks I went to my Eye Dr. and he said my eyesight was
improved and I wouldn't need as strong of a prescription. He thought it
was the new contact lenses I had been wearing (which let more air into
the eyes), but I knew it was the Eyesight Rx because I started being
able to read smaller print shortly after taking it, plus I hadn't been
wearing my contacts every day anyway. I am very satisfied with your
product. I was taking half a tablet a day 5 days a week.
A. Thanks for sharing this, it is quite interesting. Many people do
notice improvement in vision within a few days of taking this eye
formula. The dosage may need to be reduced over time. Taking 2 or 3 fish
oil capsules a day could also help with vision.
===================================
SUPPLEMENT RESEARCH UPDATE - by Ray Sahelian, M.D.
Vol. 6, Issue 11 -- October, 2009
===================================
I always enjoy reading about people who live past 100
years of age to find out if there are any secrets they attribute to their
longevity. I recently read articles about Walter Breuning from
Great Falls, Montana, who
turned 113 in September 2009. What is his secret to longevity? He claims
he eats just two meals a day (he skips dinner), drinks water, takes one baby
aspirin and eats plenty of fruit. He wakes up
around 6 in the morning. eats breakfast at 7:30 a.m. usually eggs, toast or
pancakes. He is quoted as saying, "I think you
should push back from the table when you're still hungry. You get in the habit
of not eating at night, and you realize how good you feel. If you could just
tell people not to eat so darn much."
Walter has weighed 125 pounds for the past 35 years. He also attributes his
longevity to working hard.
Genetics has a lot to do with living a long life. It's difficult to
say whether his dietary approach would work for others. I find it interesting
that so many get concerned about eating eggs for fear of high cholesterol
levels, yet Walter has been eating eggs practically daily for decades.
One of the largest groups of people who live past 100 years are
found in Okinawa, Japan. The Okinawan diet is rich in grains, vegetables and
fish, a lot of fish! In particular, cold-water varieties such as tuna, mackerel
and salmon are the most common. Most studies reveal that areas in the world
that have a high rate of centenarians have a diet that has good amounts of fish,
vegetables, mushrooms, seaweed, corn, and whole grains - and little meat.
Scientists have confirmed the longevity benefits of a diet high in fish and
vegetables and low in animal products. See
http://www.raysahelian.com/longevity.html
Organic foods,
is paying the extra price worth it?
A couple of months ago the news media made big news of a report from the London
School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine regarding organic foods. Their
conclusion was that, after reviewing 162 studies published in the scientific
literature over the last 50 years, they found no significant difference in health benefit from
consuming organic foods. Alan Dangour, one of the report's authors, said "A
small number of differences in nutrient content were found to exist between
organically and conventionally produced foodstuffs, but these are unlikely to be
of any public health relevance, our review indicates that there is currently no
evidence to support the selection of organically over conventionally produced
foods on the basis of nutritional superiority."
I was puzzled and skeptical regarding the conclusions achieved by
the investigators. I thought at the time that perhaps the researchers did not
adequately consider the
difference in content of pesticides and toxins and
my impression was that they did not compare the antioxidant flavonoids and carotenoid
content as well as they should. I was glad to see another opinion on the topic
by
Denis Lairon of the University of Aix Marseille in France. His review of data compiled for the French food
agency AFSSA shows organic plant products contain more dry matter and
minerals, including iron and magnesium, and more antioxidant polyphenols
and salicylic acid. He also reports that almost all organic food does
not contain pesticide residues, while organic vegetables contain much
lower nitrate levels than conventionally produced foods. Lairon, D.
"Nutritional quality an safety of organic food, a review." Agronomy for
Sustainable Development (2009) DOI: 10.1051/agro/2009019.
Organic fruits and vegetables are much more expensive than
conventionally grown foods. If your budget allows, purchase organically grown
produce and meat, but if you are on a tight budget, don't worry too much. As long
as you make overall healthy dietary selections, you should do just fine. After all,
Walter Breuning has lived to 113 without fussing about organic versus
non-organic foods. See
http://www.raysahelian.com/organic.html
Strontium mineral for bones
Just when you thought you had figured out which supplements to take as a
prevention or treatment for osteoporosis, such as vitamin D, calcium and
perhaps magnesium, another study comes along that makes us wonder
whether an additional mineral should be considered.
Researchers in Mexico propose that strontium therapy in postmenopausal women
has a double effect both on resorption and bone formation. To evaluate the
effect of strontium on bone mineral density (BMD) a prospective study was carried out in 23 postmenopausal
women who had decreased BMD who received daily strontium orally during
12 months. BMD at the spine and hip increased
significantly after 12 months of treatment.
Comments: Are strontium supplements better than calcium and vitamin D as a
treatment for osteoporosis? It appears that strontium supplements are effective
for increasing bone strength but it is not clear whether they offer any
advantages over calcium and vitamin D and whether all three supplements can be
combined, and if so, what the appropriate dosages would be. For the time being I
recommend calcium and vitamin D, perhaps magnesium, and, if you have a
strong family history of osteoporosis or if you already have
osteoporosis, consider discussing with your doctor regarding the addition of strontium supplements. The multi-year
benefits and risks of strontium mineral therapy, and how it interacts
with calcium and vitamin D, is not fully understood at this time. My
thoughts would be to take a strontium pill of 300 to 400 mg two or three
days a week until we learn more about the appropriate dosage and long
term side effects. See
http://www.raysahelian.com/strontium.html and
http://www.raysahelian.com/osteoporosis.html
Emails
How long of a break is good from taking vitamins or multivitamins?
There is no simple answer that applies to everyone. As a
general rule, for multivitamins that are taken for overall health
maintenance purposes, it is a good idea to take a minimum of one day off
a week and a 3 or 4 days off each month. This is just my personal
opinion, some doctors do not believe multivitamins are necessary while
others believe high doses are beneficial taken every day. The field of
supplementation is not an exact science, taking a little more or less is
not likely to make a big difference, the general idea is to not rely
taking these supplements all the time except for the treatment of a
specific condition that requires daily use.
My doctor told me (after taking blood test of DHEA
and testosterone) that my adrenal glands are not releasing enough DHEA,
he said that my blood level was low and advised me to take 25 mg of DHEA
twice per day for 25 days then take a break for 5 days and continue. I
worry about the side effects of DHEA. What do you advise?
I can't make specific suggestions or give personal advice,
but I think it would be helpful for your doctor to read about the
potential side effects of hormone use, and I list DHEA side effects on
my web page. Many doctors are not aware of these potential adverse
reactions, either to hormones or medications they prescribe. Many are
also not aware of the potential negative interactions between the
various medications they prescribe. See
http://www.raysahelian.com/dhea.html
Thank you very much for your research with pregnenolone.
At first I didn't listen fully to your precautions but
after only several days of taking the hormone pills, I experienced heart
excitability. I will now follow your suggestions. I took 10mg sublingual for 2
days followed by 5mg for two days. I can almost say it puts me into sort
of a pre-psychedelic feeling high space. My goal was to increase memory
and energy levels not to get high. Thank you again for your invaluable information.
Yes, many people notice heart rhythm disturbances from a
dosage above 5 or 10 mg, and I am not comfortable with products that are
sold in 25, 50 and 100 mg. See
www.raysahelian.com/pregnenolone.html
I rely on your website for honest opinions regarding
supplements, even though you also formulate products. I was thrilled to
find you after a confusing and stressful experience with a vitamin
company heavily promoting and encouraging the taking of lots of pills,
and Suzanne Somers's book. I appreciate the fact that you do NOT support
taking a supplement every single day, but a few times a week. This tells
me that you are not only not pushing your product, but that you have a
conservative rather than fanatical take on natural health and
supplementation. I am a 57 year old woman who like many baby-boomers are
growing more concerned and interested in fighting the aging process and
keeping disease at bay. And you are also very accurate about all of the
conflicting information out now. Most of it by apparent reputable
physicians, that one feels should be trusted in their knowledge and
honesty. But it seems that no matter the source or study, their
recommendations are also opinion driven based on their interpretation
and feelings on the subject. You mention that we should not take more than 5 to10
supplements except for medical reasons. I take more than that at the
moment, and have cut back a great deal. But just when I read something
that cause me alarm, and cut it, I read something else that promotes
it's safety and effectiveness for possible disease prevention. Would you
consider calcium, vitamin D (osteoporosis prevention), bromelain,
probiotics (digestion / irritable bowel syndrome), glucosomine /
chondrointin (osteoarthritis) part of this list of medical reasons? This
still leaves around ten that I take because they're supposed to be good
and safe (including fish oil, flax seed oil, garlic, ginger, turmeric,
CQ10, R-Lipoic Acid, Acetyl L Carnitine, quercetin). Some I take a few
times a week, most I take daily. These are the ones I have thru research
deemed effective and safe, hopefully. I know you can't comment on
personal situations, I was just wondering if I could be doing more harm
than good. I have concerns about what these are possibly doing to my
liver (so then I hear about ginkgo, which protects the liver, and I'm
off and running). Frankly, even reading your extensive list of
information on almost every supplement, one would think they needed ALL
of them. I have a wonderful primary care physician, but I'm not sure how
much she really believes in alternative preventative medicine. And
frankly, I'm somewhat embarrassed to admit just how much my fear allows
me to believe, even though I try and err on the side of safety and
conservativeness. Anyway, I'd appreciate any feedback you may have.
This is an excellent question that most people who take
supplements grapple with. There are literally hundreds and thousands
different nutrients, vitamins, minerals, supplements, fruit and
vegetable extracts, and herbs available over the counter, and most of
these have had preliminary research that supports their health benefits
as antioxidants, lowering blood sugar, lowering blood cholesterol,
improving mental function, increasing wellbeing and vitality, and other
benefits. However, it is not possible or practical to take them all.
Which ones should one choose? There is no simple answer. Many nutrients
and herbs are quite safe and don't conflict with others. For instance,
low or reasonable dosages of calcium, vitamin D, probiotics, glucosamine,
chondroitin, fish oils, flax seed oil, garlic, ginger, turmeric, are
quite safe. CoQ10, alpha lipoic acid and acetyl l carnitine are also
safe when used in low dosages. One way you can tell if you are taking
too many supplements or too high a dosage of certain ones is if you
notice being restless, have excessive energy, feel anxious, notice your
heart rate beating much faster, feel an elevated body temperature, and
have difficulty sleeping. These could be symptoms and signs that you are
taking too many pills. Much also depends on your activity level. If a
person is very active and does physical labor, such as construction, or
runs several miles a day, then they can tolerate higher dosages since
they are using up the excess energy provided from the supplements. But
those who have a sedentary job may not use up all the energy and this
could lead to shallow and restless sleep. As a general rule, it is
a good idea to take each supplement separately for a week or so to
determine how that particular pill is having an effect on you. I suggest
everyone who plans to take supplements for prolonged periods to read
this page in full.
http://www.physicianformulas.com/store/Scripts/prodview.asp?idproduct=224&name=NEWSLETTER
===================================
SUPPLEMENT RESEARCH UPDATE - by Ray Sahelian, M.D.
Vol. 6, Issue 10 -- September, 2009
===================================
According to an article published in the
August 15, 2009 issue of the American Journal of
Epidemiology, people who take multivitamin supplements that include
vitamin E and C daily for several years have a slightly lower risk of
heart disease and lower rate of death. Vitamin C supplement use was
associated with a lower rate of cancer. Over the past few decades there
have been dozens of major studies evaluating the role of vitamin
supplements and the risk of heart disease and cancer. The results have
not always been in agreement. Having reviewed most of these studies, my
personal opinion at this time is that there is some benefit from the use
of these vitamins but diet plays a much more important role. If a person
takes the appropriate amounts of vitamins through pills but has a
terrible diet that includes lots of sweets, sugared drinks, white bread,
and fried foods, the vitamins will not help prevent the subsequent heart
disease and cancer resulting from these bad food choices. The bottom
line is to eat as healthy as you can and, if you wish, take a
multivitamin supplement a few days a week. The researchers in this study
focused mostly on vitamins C and E. Most multivitamin products, such as MultiVit Rx, contain one to three dozen vitamins, minerals, nutrients
and sometimes herbal extracts such as green tea. There are thousands of
different multivitamin products on the market each with its own mix and
dosage of ingredients. Therefore it is not easy to predict the overall
influence on health of taking a multivitamin that has many more
ingredients than just vitamins C and E. If you plan to take MultiVit Rx,
one or two capsules 3 or 4 times a week should be fine for most users.
If you already take many other supplements and antioxidants daily,
consider taking the multivitamin less frequently.
A few months ago an offer was made for a free bottle of
stevia liquid, the no calorie sweetener that you can use in your tea or
coffee or to sweeten lemonade. This was the most successful free offer
thus far and a very large number of people took advantage of it. This
stevia liquid bottle is being offered for free again to all newsletter
subscribers. Click on the image of the bottle and add it to your cart.
1. Should you stop your daily aspirin use?
Many doctors recommend their healthy patients take a daily dose of aspirin
in order to prevent heart attacks. Do the blood thinning benefits trump
the potential risks? The results of the Aspirin for Asymptomatic
Atherosclerosis study found that the risks of bleeding from taking
aspirin were such that its routine use in healthy people is not advised,
although the researchers did agree its benefits in patients with a
history of vascular problems such as
heart attack or stroke. Professor Peter Weissberg, medical director of
the British Heart Foundation which helped fund the research, says,
"The findings of this study agree with our current advice that people
who do not have symptomatic or diagnosed artery or heart disease should
not take aspirin, because the risks of bleeding may outweigh the
benefits." The study involved 3,350 men and women aged 50 to 75 years whose
leg arteries were partially hardened --
but who had no history of heart attack.
They were given either a daily 100 mg dose of aspirin or a placebo and
evaluated over eight years.
While there was no difference in the number of heart attacks or strokes, major bleeding occurred in two
percent of the aspirin group compared to just 1.2 percent of the placebo
group.
Comments: If you have no heart or vascular problems, it is
not necessary to take aspirin. If you wish to take it, limit your dosage
to a baby aspirin two or three times a week rather than daily. A baby
aspirin has 81 mg. Also consider fish oil pills or other herbal
supplements since they can help thin the blood but have a very low rate
of bleeding problems. See
http://www.raysahelian.com/bloodclot.html
2. PSA tests for prostate cancer, are they
necessary?
Screening for prostate cancer is a
controversial topic. The tests can find cancers in a few men but cause
needless worry and expense for the vast majority who may end up getting
treated for tumors that enlarge too slowly to do any harm. Dr. H.
Gilbert Welch of the VA Outcomes Group in White River Junction, Vermont,
reports routine screening for prostate cancer has resulted in more than
one million men being diagnosed with tumors who might otherwise have
suffered no harmful effects. The increased diagnosis rate more than
tripled in men aged 50 to 59 and increased more than a sevenfold in men
under age 50. And while prostate cancer deaths in the US have declined
since the introduction of PSA testing in 1986, about 20 men have to be
diagnosed and treated for every one who benefits. All current forms of
treatment -- surgery, radiation or hormone therapy -- can cause a high
rate of side effects, such as erectile dysfunction and incontinence,
Just being told you have cancer is psychologically damaging, causing
anxiety and feelings of vulnerability and fear of death. A U.S. expert
panel last year urged doctors to stop screening men over 75, but doctors
still disagree about the right approach to PSA screening.
Comments: Different doctors have different recommendations
regarding the necessity and timing of PSA tests. Since there is a wide
range of opinions on this topic, much depends on you, the patient, and
your personal feelings about testing. Men will need to weigh the
potential benefits and risks of PSA testing and what works for them and
their lifestyle and overall approach to health maintenance. I tend to
lean on the side of testing less often and focusing more on making
dietary and lifestyles changes that reduce the risk of this condition.
See
http://www.raysahelian.com/prostatecancer.html
3. Danger of diet pills
The US Food and Drug Administration is reviewing 32
reports of serious liver injury, including 6 cases of liver failure, in
patients taking the weight loss drug orlistat, marketed as the
prescription drug Xenical or the over-the-counter medication alli.
Comments: If the same serious
side effects had occurred with a nutritional supplement, it is likely
that government agencies would have already banned its use. For natural
ways to lose weight including tips on diet and food choices, see
http://www.raysahelian.com/weightloss.html
Emails
Q. I read an article on AOL health news that said, "Take the dynamic duo of supplements.
They're what Bruce N. Ames, Ph.D., a professor of biochemistry and
molecular biology at the University of California, Berkeley, swears by:
His daily 800 mg of alpha-lipoic acid and 2,000 mg of acetyl-L-carnitine.
In these amounts, he says, the chemicals boost the energy output of
mitochondria, which power our cells. "I think mitochondrial decay is a
major factor in aging," Ames says -- it's been linked to diseases such
as Alzheimer's and diabetes.
In his studies, elderly rats plied with the supplements had more energy
and ran mazes better. "If you're an old rat, you can be enthusiastic,"
Ames says. "As people, we can't be sure until clinical trials are done."
(They're under way.) But the compounds look very safe -- the worst side
effect documented in humans is a rash, Ames says -- and "the data in
animals looks really convincing," says S. Mitchell Harman, M.D., Ph.D.,
president of the Kronos Longevity Research Institute in Phoenix." I have
followed your writings for many years and often find that you are a lot
more practical and cautious than some other doctors who recommend
supplements. What is your opinion on the above?
A. There is some good evidence that acetyl l carnitine (ALC)
and alpha lipoic acid (ALA) are excellent supplements, but I am much
more cautious about the dosages. My personal opinion is to limit the use
of ALC to 300 mg or less two or three times a week and ALA to 50 mg or
less two or three times a week. We have to keep in mind that, unlike
rodents who were given ALC and ALA exclusively, most people take
additional supplement pills, such as multivitamins, herbs and
antioxidants, or drink coffee and alcohol, that could interfere or
enhance the effects of alc and ala. I have had reports of people getting
heart rhythm disturbances on high dosages of ALA, and both ALC and ALA
can cause shallow sleep or insomnia if used in high dosages. Not
sleeping deeply leads to pro-aging effects. See
http://www.raysahelian.com/antioxidant.html
Q. I'd like to say my opinion about acai berry, as I am from Brazil, maybe the main producer, and I've been to the Amazon a few times. It's a very strong tasty berry, that people do not eat raw. We drink the frozen pulp with water or mixed with sugar and banana like a very soft icy paste, resembling a sorbet, although in the north of Brazil some people eat it as food dishes, with salty assortments (either way people squash the fruits and freeze the juice still in the Amazon state, then sell it to producers of the final ice cream we eat). Because it has a strong and a bit earthy taste, its usually a love-it-or-leave-it. I love it from childhood, we know its a strong fruit, known for good fatty acids, vitamins, and for being highly energetic (can make you fat if you eat too much). I've never heard in 20 years eating it everywhere, that it helps you lose weight. For me, this is one more proof of how marketing and not-so ethical people are making everyday more false promises, specially in the US. As you wrote about it in the last issue of the newsletter, it's a healthy addition to someone's diet, not a miraculous berry that will make you lose many pounds of fat.
===================================
SUPPLEMENT RESEARCH UPDATE - by Ray Sahelian, M.D.
Vol. 6, Issue 9 -- August, 2009
===================================
Oprah and the medical doctor who often comes on her show, Dr. Oz, are suing 50
different companies for using their names and images without their approval to
sell products, many of them dietary supplements. In the last issue of the
newsletter I warned you about the acai scam, how some marketers are offering
free bottles and collecting credit card numbers and then charging the customers
monthly for shipping additional bottles. Some of these acai companies are also
using the image and unapproved endorsement of Oprah to sell their products. As I
have previously mentioned, I think acai is a healthy berry and supplement, but
is not likely to be much more beneficial than a number of other berries such as
blueberry, boysenberry, cranberry and goji berry.
There's another supplement that is recently getting a lot of hype.
Many subscribers have asked my thoughts on resveratrol. One recent email asked me
to comment regarding claims made on another website. The
article the person quoted said, "Resveratrol is a potent antioxidant
found in certain fruits, vegetables and cocoa that is emerging as a
modern-day fountain of youth. The science surrounding this compound
is so compelling that it has become an all-time favorite antioxidant.
Resveratrol is typically associated with grapes and red wine, and
was originally believed to be the reason for the so-called “French
Paradox” -- the tendency for French people to have great
cardiovascular health despite a “poor” diet and love for wine."
I will offer you my thoughts on resveratrol below.
PRODUCT DISCOUNTS at Physician Formulas -- For the next few days all the items at Physician Formulas are on sale for an additional 10 percent off on top of the existing discounts, including the bestselling formulas Passion Rx, Diet Rx, Mind Power Rx, Joint Power Rx, Prostate Power Rx, MultiVit Rx, and Eyesight Rx. As a newsletter subscriber you are eligible to get this discount but make sure to follow the instructions. After you add all the products you wish to purchase to your cart, type the word august in the discount code space provided and then click the update button below it. To repeat, type the word august in the discount code space provided and then click on the update button below it. If you have questions, call the customer care representatives at the number listed on the Physician Formulas website at the top of the page.
The Resveratrol hype, is this an anti-aging supplement?
Resveratrol is a chemical found in various plants, including grapes, berries,
and cacao. What made resveratrol popular was a November 2006 study that reported
mice lived longer when given this substance. Research studies continue to find
more interesting benefits from this red wine compound, including potential
anti-cancer and anti-aging activity. Animal research from all over the globe
indicates that resveratrol has a wide range of beneficial properties. However,
thus far, the research has focused in animals, worms and fruit flies, and we
have no idea what would happen if humans ingested this supplement for prolonged
periods, and how it interacts with other supplements or medications. Most of the
resveratrol supplements on the market are an extract, usually 5 to 40 percent,
of an herb called Polygonum
cuspidatum which has a very high content of the substance. Therefore, when you
take a resveratrol pill, you are also ingesting many other substances found
within this herb. It is likely these substances are also beneficial, but we
don't know for sure. The resveratrol product sold on the Physician Formulas
website has 10 mg of this antioxidant derived from 40 mg of Polygonum Cuspidatum
root. Hence it is a 25 % extract.
Furthermore, even if this substance has anti-aging benefits in
humans, we have no idea what the proper amount would be. Is it 5 mg a day, 10
mg, 50 mg, or more? There are a number of unanswered questions. For practical
purposes, if you do wish to take this pill, I think a safe approach is to take
one capsule of the 10 mg product 2 or 3 times a week. There are countless
beneficial antioxidant substances in the form of supplements available to the
consumer and I think taking small amounts of different ones is a reasonable
approach until we have a clearer idea of the proper dosages. If you are a wine
lover, Pinot Noir seems to have the highest concentration of resveratrol. See
http://www.raysahelian.com/resveratrol.html
Fewer close encounters, but a healthier heart
I love garlic and usually consume it an evening
when I know I will not go out or be around people the next morning. Too bad this
wonderful herb, with so many health benefits, has such a distinct odor. Is the
encapsulated form or cooked garlic just as healthy? In one recent study, garlic
was found beneficial to the heart and blood vessels, but fresh garlic had more heart-healthy benefits.
Researchers at the University of Connecticut School of Medicine in Farmington
report that raw, crushed garlic generates hydrogen sulfide which acts as a chemical messenger in the body, relaxing
blood vessels and allowing more blood to pass through. However,
processed and cooked garlic lose most of their ability to generate hydrogen
sulfide. The researchers gave freshly crushed garlic and processed
garlic to two groups of lab rats, and then studied how well the
animals' hearts recovered from simulated heart attacks. Both crushed
and processed garlic reduced damage from lack of oxygen, but the
fresh garlic group had a significantly greater effect on restoring
good blood flow in the aorta and other blood vessels,
Comments: You are better off consuming fresh garlic, but, if
you cannot do so for taste or social reasons, then garlic pills are a good
alternative. See
http://www.raysahelian.com/garlic.html
Emails
Q. I have been reading your newsletters now
for years and you have helped me many times regarding which
supplements you recommend and which ones there are not enough
information on as well as the email you answered in last month's
newsletter from the 27 year old male and whether or not he should
start taking supplements and in what quantity. I have been taking
pretty much the same supplement for years, maybe changing brands,
adding some supplements along the way and dropping others. What you
said to this man has helped me once again. You told him to take time
off, whether it's skipping a day here and there or for a couple of
weeks is also a good idea. I never allow myself off the hook and
even on vacation I take along all of my supplements. I am leaving
for about 10 days this week to go out of town and guess what, I'm
going to leave most of my supplements home. I will take my probiotics and my vitamin D because I know that
it's important to have the right level of D; other than that, the
rest will stay home and I will take a nice break.
A. If you are going to get a lot of sun on your vacation the
vitamin D may not be necessary, either. There are some supplements I take along
on vacation just in case. Zinc lozenges are a good idea, along with vitamin C,
to have in your possession in order to start them at the first onset of a cold.
Sometimes I take a natural sleep aid such as melatonin on Good Night Rx if I
think I may have occasional nights of trouble sleeping. I like to take along a
couple of tablets of SAM-e and take one pill once or twice while I am on
vacation since I find it makes the day I use it slightly more interesting and
magical, along with providing an upbeat mood. Fiber pills or powder is a good
idea to take on a trip to prevent constipation unless the food you will eat has
a high fiber content.
Q. I see many commercials on TV regarding herbal male
enhancement products. They claim that their herbal formula increases the size of
the male organ and some penis enlargement ads on the internet even claim that
one can gain an inch or two, or even three inches. I respect your opinion and
wanted to know if this was possible.
A. Male enhancement is not a clearly defined term. Some people use
this term to claim that their natural product increases the size of the penis,
whereas others use the term male enhancement to refer to overall sexual
improvement through the use of herbs, which is easily done.
I am not aware of any herbal or pharmaceutical pill that leads to an
anatomically bigger penis. However, if s person is normally not very aroused
sexually, and the penis is normally
flaccid, certain herbs can improve engorgement. It is possible that one will achieve maximal
penis engorgement which could lead to a little larger penis than one used to. But this
does not mean that it got larger, it just means that it became
the maximum size it would normally have been under ideal arousal and healthy conditions.
It is also possible that if a penis is normally very flaccid, the
sexual herbs can improve blood flow and one may notice the non-erect penis
to be larger or fuller due to improved circulation or blood pooling. However,
and again, this does not mean that these natural herbal sexual pills actually led to
penis enlargement. They are just improving circulation
and helping with maximal dilation and engorgement that one may otherwise achieve under ideal aroused situations.
Many websites promise potential customers that if they use their
herbal product for a few weeks or months that they will gain one to three inches. They
even show pictures (we all know how easy it is to manipulate graphics) of men
before and after. If you purchase such products with the thought that your penis
will become larger by 1 to 3 inches, you are likely to be disappointed.
However, this does not mean that such products are worthless. Many
natural herbal pills sold over the counter are effective in enhancing sexual
pleasure, stamina, sex drive and can help men achieve longer lasting erections
and more powerful orgasms. Many natural substances really work. It is surprising
to me that so many doctors and scientists dismiss the benefits of these natural
aphrodisiacs. If they do, it is most likely due to their lack of personal
experience or lack of a review of studies which are gradually showing, in double
blind studies, that such herbal aphrodisiacs do exist and are worthwhile. A few
of these herbs include catuaba, horny goat weed, maca, mucuna pruriens, muira
puama, tongkat ali, tribulus terrestris, yohimbe, or a combination found in
Passion Rx. They often take a few days to start working and are best used at
least a half hour or an hour before breakfast. See
http://www.raysahelian.com/natural_sex_boosters.html
Q. In the last issue you mentioned how some
online supplement sellers will keep charging your credit card
regularly even though the consumer may ask to stop regular
shipments. My credit card company now has a feature that will
generate a temporary number with a limited amount of dollars
available under this temporary number. in your newsletter you say
people fall victim and can't stop charges, all they would have to do
is use this temp cc# with a limited dollar amount available. Thx for
the gr8 newsletters.
A. Thanks for the info.
===================================
SUPPLEMENT RESEARCH UPDATE - by Ray Sahelian, M.D.
Vol. 6, Issue 8 -- August, 2009
===================================
Every day there are a few emails in my spam folder about the benefits of acai
berry products as potent antioxidants, energy boosters, and for weight loss. I
have several friends and patients who have recently asked me whether they should
take acai supplements since it is being touted so heavily as a one of a kind
superfood pill. Some websites make such claims as "30 pounds of weight
loss in 30 days!" A few websites offer free trials. Consumers are asked to
provide a credit card to pay shipping and handling charges, but begin almost
immediately receiving $50 to $80 monthly charges. Countless consumers have had
difficulty stopping those charges once they canceled the free trial offer.
As of now I have not come across any human trials regarding the use
of acai supplements as a treatment of a specific medical condition or as a way
to improve health or longevity. Acai, just like any berry, has a number of
beneficial substances, but I can't say that it offers any more benefits than
others such as common one available in grocery stores, for instance blueberries
or cranberries. All berries have helpful substances and I would rather alternate
their consumption rather taking a high amount of just one supplement or
consuming only one type. I think it is probably beneficial to take an acai
extract capsule a few times a week, and on other days other fruit and vegetable
extracts can be used. I have seen no evidence that the use of acai berry
supplements leads to weight loss.
PRODUCT DISCOUNTS at Physician Formulas -- For the next few days all the items at Physician Formulas are on sale for an additional 10 percent off on top of the existing discounts, including the bestselling formulas Passion Rx, Diet Rx, Mind Power Rx, Joint Power Rx, Prostate Power Rx, MultiVit Rx, and Eyesight Rx. As a newsletter subscriber you are eligible to get this discount but make sure to follow the instructions. After you add all the products you wish to purchase to your cart, type the word august in the discount code space provided and then click the update button below it. To repeat, type the word august in the discount code space provided and then click on the update button below it. If you have questions, call the customer care representatives at the number listed on the Physician Formulas website at the top of the page.
Stevia sweetener, does it have a physiological effect on the body?
As many of you know, stevia, the no calorie natural herbal
sweetener, has become quite popular ever since the major beverage
companies began to use stevia extract products in their drinks and
the FDA declared it to be a safe product. We have had many questions
regarding the influence of this sweetener on blood pressure or blood
sugar levels, particularly those who have high blood pressure or
diabetes. Researchers at the Clinical Hospital, National University Asunción, Mayor Bullo 315, Asuncion,
in Paraguay tested
the effects of stevia extracts on blood sugar and on blood
pressure in patients with diabetes type II and those without health
problems. Subjects added stevia extracts to their diet for a period
of 3 months. Post-treatment systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood
pressure, glucose and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) were not
significantly different from baseline measurements. It appears that
the small amounts of stevia that most people consume is not likely
to have a major influence on blood pressure or blood sugar and those
with these medical conditions can safely use this natural sweetener.
In fact, I can't think of anyone who cannot safely use small amounts
of this product. The clear stevia liquid can sweeten tea or coffee
with as little as 3 or 4 drops, and without any aftertaste. See
http://www.physicianformulas.com/store/Scripts/prodview.asp?idproduct=208&name=Stevia-Clear-Liquid
and
http://www.raysahelian.com/stevia.html
Flaxseeds lower blood cholesterol
A study funded
by the Chinese Academy of Sciences reviewed the benefits of flaxseed and
its derivatives on blood lipid profiles. A thorough literature
search was performed of randomized
controlled trials of flaxseeds on lipid profiles and cholesterol
levels
in adults. Twenty-eight
such studies were included. Flaxseed interventions reduced total and LDL
cholesterol. Significant reductions were observed with whole
flaxseed and lignan supplements but not with flaxseed oil. The
cholesterol-lowering effects were more apparent in females
(particularly postmenopausal women) and individuals with high initial
cholesterol concentrations. No significant changes were found in the
concentrations of HDL cholesterol and triglycerides. Flaxseed
significantly reduced circulating total and LDL-cholesterol
concentrations.
Comments: Flaxseeds are an excellent addition to one's diet.
They help reduce symptoms of constipation and can help reduce levels
of bad cholesterol. Add whole flaxseeds to soups or when you make a
fruit smoothie. I like the crunchy feeling biting into a flaxseed
that has absorbed fluids and become expanded, moist and full.
Perhaps those who are treated with statin drugs could reduce their
drug dosage if they consume half a teaspoon or a teaspoon of whole
flaxseeds a day. Flaxseed oil may provide other health benefits but
does not appear to lower cholesterol levels. See
http://www.raysahelian.com/flaxseed.html
Probiotics reduce the incidence of the common
cold and reduce symptoms of vaginosis
Kids who drink a mixture of probiotic bacteria mixed in milk during the winter and
spring have fewer colds and need fewer antibiotics. A study in China involved 326 children, ages 3 to 5
years, who were assigned to three different groups: Group one took bacteria called Lactobacillus acidophilus mixed
in milk, another received the same organisms along with a strain of
other bacteria, Bifidobacterium animalis, and a third received just milk with placebo. The test formulas were given twice
daily by school officials during
the week and by parents on weekends. Compared to the
placebo group, the Lactobacillus group had 53 percent fewer fevers,
41 percent fewer cough episodes, and 28 percent fewer runny noses.
The Lactobacillus / Bifidobacterium group had even larger reductions
in symptom rates. When children in the test groups
did get fevers, coughs or runny noses, they recovered faster. Compared to placebo, the length of illness was decreased by
32 percent with Lactobacillus and by 48 percent with the combination Lactobacillus / Bifidobacterium.
See
www.raysahelian.com/probiotic.html and
http://www.raysahelian.com/bifidobacterium.html
Bacterial vaginosis (BV) occurs when the normal balance of bacteria in the vagina is altered, and some beneficial bacteria are replaced by an overgrowth of harmful bacteria. Antibiotics can treat the infection, though it often recurs. Researchers in Nigeria reviewed 24 clinical trials of various anti-microbial therapies for BV, including probiotic supplements containing Lactobacillus bacteria. They found that while the antibiotics clindamycin and metronidazole cleared the majority of BV infections within several weeks, adding a month's worth of oral Lactobacillus to women's metronidazole treatment improved the antibiotic's effectiveness. In addition, Lactobacillus tablets applied vaginally for a few days were more effective than oral metronidazole alone. See http://www.raysahelian.com/lactobacillus.html
Emails
Q. After several years of reading
scientific articles and mostly non-scientific web pages about
health and nutrition, I am thrilled to have found your web-site. Its honesty about our ignorance on the theme is
relieving, to say the least. I am a 27 year old healthy guy with no
major health issues, practicing a small but regular amount of
sports. Although I consider myself to be on a healthy diet, I
understand the importance of taking supplements. Your web-site
changed my perception about it though. I am currently taking a
multi-vitamin and two specific supplements (used to take them
everyday). I am now considering adding quite a few more, but in
lower doses, making their use less frequent, and possibly
alternating their use. Because I want my question to be as generic
as possible, I will not fall into the temptation of telling what
these supplements are, but just for information, they are mostly for
general health and some of the most hyped
supplements on the market today. Am I
too YOUNG to start on this kind of supplement regimen? Just to
illustrate my concerns, maybe some of these strong anti-oxidants may
have a beneficial influence that we don't now today over some heart condition
that I haven't even developed, but perhaps some have a harmful
effect that we don't know of? Maybe I can wait a few more years before taking
them and know more about my body and possible conditions, not to
mention more clinical studies on humans. On the other hand, maybe I
don't take the supplements and prevent myself from some benefits we are already
aware of.
A. It is very difficult to predict, looking forward to
decades from now, whether taking the various
antioxidant supplements will help or not help, or perhaps even harm
if taken in high dosages on a daily basis.
Since there is a great deal of uncertainty, in my opinion, it is a
good idea to use lower dosages, to include small amounts of a few
rather than a high amount of one type of antioxidant supplement, and
to take at least a day or two off all pills each week and perhaps a
full week off every couple of months or so. Practically every doctor
or health expert, and educated consumer, has their own viewpoint on
this topic and I can't say mine is definitively the correct one. But
I would be concerned, at a young age, in taking too many antioxidant
pills on a daily basis for so many decades when such research is not
available. By taking low dosages and taking breaks from use, any
potential harm would be minimized and perhaps you can reap many
benefits.
Q. I am in my fifties and trying to maintain good muscle tone since
I understand it will help me later in life and I also want to look
good. I have no intention in being a big muscle man. I look through
many muscle magazines when I visit Barnes and Noble, and there are
countless substances and supplements, including hormones, being
promoted for muscle gain. I trust your judgment and opinion and
would like to know which of the various such products on the market
you think are most helpful.
A. Without a doubt, creatine supplements are the most effective in
maintaining and increasing muscle mass and most people notice the
benefits after a few days of taking 3 or 5 grams daily. Creatine
comes as a powder and you can mix a teaspoon or so in a couple of
ounces of fruit or vegetable juice once daily for a week or so and
then every other day. You can also find creatine capsules. Protein
powders are also effective, such as whey protein or soy protein. For
the average person who has no interest in being a big bodybuilder or
athlete, these two simple options are the most practical and
effective. See
http://www.raysahelian.com/bodybuilding.html and
http://www.raysahelian.com/creatine.html
===================================
SUPPLEMENT RESEARCH UPDATE - by Ray Sahelian, M.D.
Vol. 6, Issue 7 -- July, 2009
===================================
"Omega-3 little help in slowing Alzheimer's,
but supplements may ease memory problems in healthy seniors."
This headline was found on many health news sites on the internet.
The article, written by Reuters news service, continues,
"Omega-3 fatty acid supplements did nothing to slow memory declines
in people with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease, but a study in
healthy people with slight memory complaints did show promise. The
findings from an 18-month, government-backed study suggest taking
supplements of docosahexenoic acid, or DHA — an omega-3 fatty acid —
does not arrest Alzheimer's in people who have already developed the
mind-robbing disease."
The fatty acid they are talking about is DHA, a type of omega-3
fatty acid found in fish oils. Omega-3 fatty acids include a number
of different fatty acids, each with its own function and influence
on health and disease. For instance, alpha linolenic acid, ALA, is a
smaller omega-3 fatty acid found in walnuts hemp seed, and many seed
oils. The omega-3 fatty acids found in fish and fish oils include
EPA and DHA. The role of ALA in the body is different than that of
EPA and different than that of DHA. The title of the article heading
is imprecise since the term omega-3 can include a number of
different fatty acids. More on this study later.
PRODUCT DISCOUNTS at Physician Formulas -- For the next few days we are offering a free bottle of turmeric curcumin supplement. If you would like this bottle, click on the image and make sure you add it to your shopping cart. As a newsletter subscriber you are eligible to get this free bottle. We are also offering Joint Power Rx at an excellent discount. Joint Power Rx is quite popular in those who wish to improve their joint health, particularly as they get older.
DHA omega-3 Alzheimer's and memory study
The reason this study only used DHA, but not the combination EPA and DHA
normally found in fish oils, is because it was funded by Martek Biosciences, a
company which has its own DHA product.
In the Alzheimer's study, researchers compared Martek's DHA supplements to a
placebo in 402 people with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease. Although
blood levels of DHA increased, there was no significant improvement
in those with Alzheimer's disease.
In a related study lasting six months, researchers looked at the effects of
a 900 mg daily dose of DHA on 485 healthy people with an average age
of 70 who had a mild memory complaint. The DHA supplements
helped restore some of the mental acuity they had lost.
My comments: DHA supplements are probably helpful for mild memory
loss in older individuals, but they are very expensive and I don't see the need
to take DHA by itself when fish oils are available that provide both EPA and DHA
at a much lower cost. DHA supplements are derived from algae and are appropriate
to vegetarians and vegans who do not wish to take fish oils. I have reviewed
other studies in the past regarding the role of fish oils in Alzheimer's
disease, and it appears that once this condition has reached a moderate level of
severity, fish oils are not helpful. See
http://www.raysahelian.com/dha.html
Hair pulling treatment
Dr. Jon E. Grant from the
University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, reports that N-acetylcysteine
is helpful in the treatment of repetitive or compulsive disorders. His team evaluated the effects of
N-acetylcysteine treatment in 50 adults with trichotillomania, or
obsessive hair pulling.
Twenty-five subjects were randomly assigned to receive 1,200 milligrams to
2,400 milligrams of N-acetylcysteine per day; the other
25 received placebo or dummy pills. After 12 weeks, patients taking the
supplement had significantly greater reductions in hair-pulling symptoms than
those taking placebo. Acetylcysteine may influence the glutamate system,
the largest neurotransmitter system in the human brain. See
http://www.raysahelian.com/acetylcysteine.html
The role of diet in prostate cancer
A review of studies done by Australian scientists finds the risk of
developing prostate cancer, or slowing its progression, may be
possible by reducing intake of bad fats, processed or grilled meats, or dairy
products. Men who regularly eat vegetables, including tomatoes and cruciferous vegetables like broccoli, cauliflower,
cabbage and Brussels sprouts have a lower risk
of developing the cancer. The same appears true of men who consume
greater amounts of vitamin E, soy, fish and omega-3 fatty acids --
"good" fats found in oily fish and certain other foods, such as
flaxseeds. Improving dietary habits after prostate cancer diagnosis
may also improve survival from the disease. Men who drink heavily
raise their risk of developing prostate cancer. See
http://www.raysahelian.com/prostatecancer.html
Creatine helps with muscle recovery after exercise
Dr. Matthew B. Cooke of Baylor University
in Waco, Texas, assigned 14 young, non-exercising men to take creatine and carbohydrate or carbohydrate only for five days before
and 14 days after a heavy exercise session. Creatine is a natural
substance found in muscle tissue and available over the counter as a supplement.
Study participants were instructed to take the supplement mixed with water
throughout the day before the heavy workout. The men taking creatine had
faster recovery in muscle strength.
Comments: Creatine is a supplement that really works in terms of
increasing muscle strength and muscle mass, particularly in those who do some
weight training. Those who wish to increase their muscle mass can take this
supplement any time of day at a dosage of 3 gram once or twice daily a few times
a week. After a few days you will notice bigger muscles. See
http://www.raysahelian.com/creatine.html
Why you cant trust medical articles in journals
Lilly ‘Ghostwrote’ Articles to Market Drug, Files Say
See
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601109&sid=a5OeWzHgCtFo
It was reported by Bloomberg News that, "Eli Lilly & Co.
pharmaceutical company officials wrote medical
journal studies about the antipsychotic Zyprexa and then asked
doctors to put their names on the articles, a practice called
“ghostwriting,” according to unsealed company files. Lilly employees
also compiled a guide to hiring scientists to write favorable
articles, complained to journal editors when publication was delayed
and submitted rejected articles to other outlets, according to
documents filed in drug-overpricing suits against the
Indianapolis-based company, the largest manufacturer of psychiatric
medicines.
Comments: Doctors get a number of medical journals for free
and some of these articles are, in my opinion, biased towards medications
promoted by drug companies that take out ads in these magazines or pay doctors
to write favorable articles. Unfortunately, many doctors read these articles
with little or no skepticism and are thus partially or fully "brainwashed."
Emails
I just read some very interesting information on SAM-e on Dr.
Sahelian's site. I have been looking for a reliable source about
natural supplements and I just found one!! My husband and I had
started taking SAM-e a month or so ago. We are both in our mid 50s,
overweight, and on daily doses of Lexapro (10 mg for me, 20 for my
husband) and have been for more than 3 years. Neither one of us likes taking
it, but when we try wean ourselves off we are reminded very quickly
about why we started it in the first place. We started on 200 mg of
SAM-e once in the morning at least half hour before breakfast. I had
read an article in one of the health journals I get and it said that
the dosage should be up to 800 mg daily. We really liked the way we
felt at 200 mg but increased it to 400 mg. Whew! Wrong thing to do!!
I had a severe anxiety attack one or two nights after increasing the
dose and my husband had one the night after I did. So we weaned
ourselves off the SAM-e. After stopping SAM-e we both noticed that
we had actually felt better on it and my knees didn't pain me as
much!
Comments: Many studies using SAM-e for depression give the
patients 800 mg or more, but in real life I find much lower dosages are
effective and safer.
I take 5-htp nightly for sleep and mood
improvement. I used to be able to take it at night, but for the last few
months, I wake up in the middle of the night with a peculiar energy. Would
taking it in the day help with sleep at night?
It's possible. Some people prefer to take a lower dosage in
early evening which seems to help with sleep better than a higher one before
bed. For instance, taking 20 to 50 mg a half hour before dinner may work better
than taking 100 mg an hour or so before bed. Also, it is a good idea not to take
it daily and skip at least 1 or 2 days a week. 5-HTP supplements are absorbed better on an empty stomach.
Good Night Rx is an excellent alternative for sleep.
===================================
SUPPLEMENT RESEARCH UPDATE - by Ray Sahelian, M.D.
Vol. 6, Issue 6 -- June, 2009
===================================
We have had an unusual number of emails regarding herbs for anxiety and sleep. Due to the difficult economic situation a great number of people have had more stress and tension than usual. Many are visiting their doctors to get anti-anxiety medications such as Xanax, sleeping pills, while others are searching for natural alternatives. However, there are certain natural supplements that could be helpful. There was a recent report that Australian researchers gave 60 adults with chronic anxiety symptoms either kava pills or placebo pills for one week. During the second treatment week, placebo patients were switched to kava and kava patients to placebo. Patients' anxiety symptoms declined on the kava extract, as did depression symptoms in some. Below I discuss other options for natural anxiety treatment.
Natural anxiety treatment
Exercise, deep sleep and yoga are consistent and proven ways in helping to
reduce stress and anxiety. Meditation and prayer works for others. If you
temporarily need additional help to help you relax, there are several options to
choose from. Kava is one of the most potent anti-anxiety herbs available over
the counter. The effects often begin within an hour or two after taking a
capsule. However, there have been rare reports of liver harm when kava has been
used daily. For this reason I suggest not taking kava pills more than 3 days a
week. Another herb that I like is passionflower. The effects begin in an hour or
two and include relaxation and sleepiness. Passionflower is quite safe and can
be used on the days when kava is not taken. Ashwagandha is an Ayurvedic herb
that many people find to be helpful in easing tension. Certain amino acids and
related compounds are popular for stress relief including 5-HTP, GABA and
theanine. I personally have not found GABA to be very effective although some
users really like this supplement. Theanine is a good option when taken in the
evening since it helps with sleep. 5-HTP helps to balance mood, reduces tension,
and helps with sleep. The timing of these supplements depends on the severity of
your anxiety. They can be taken during the day if you happen to be very anxious
and alert. But if your symptoms are milder and you just need a natural pill to
help you relax after work, these pills can be taken in the early evening.
An excellent sleep product that I have formulated is Good Night Rx.
A capsule is taken 2 to 4 hours before bed on an empty stomach and the vast
majority of users find they get a deeper and more restful sleep with hardly any
side effects. Wait al least a half hour after taking Good Night Rx before
consuming dinner or a late evening snack. For more info, see
http://www.raysahelian.com/anxiety.html and
http://www.raysahelian.com/kava.html
Your diet can influence your vision
Diets with good amounts of omega-3-fatty acids slow the progression of early
age-related macular degeneration.
The findings are based on a review of data from 2924 subjects who
were enrolled in the Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS).
As part of this study, subjects completed food frequency
questionnaires at the beginning of the study and underwent periodic general and
ophthalmologic physical examinations, Dr. C-J. Chiu, from Tufts University,
Boston, found that
higher quantities of omega fatty acid intake lowered the risk of
progression to advanced macular degeneration. In addition, a lower
dietary glycemic index was associated with a reduced risk of
progression. Omega-3s can be obtained from fish oils and flaxseed
oil. A low glycemic intake can be achieved by eating less sugar and simple
carbohydrates. See
http://www.raysahelian.com/maculardegeneration.html and
http://www.raysahelian.com/glycemicindex.html. Flaxseed oil has a high
concentration of a type of omega-3 fatty acid called ALA which can convert into
fatty acids found in fish oil called EPA and DHA. See
http://www.raysahelian.com/flaxseed.html
L-Carnitine helpful for diabetics
Patients with type 2 diabetes are under high oxidative stress. The objective of this
Italian study was to evaluate the
benefit of L-carnitine on the reduction of oxidized LDL cholesterol
in patients with type 2 diabetes. Eighty-one patients with diabetes were randomly assigned
to 1 of 2 treatment groups for 3 months. The 2 groups received either 2
g L-carnitine once daily or placebo. At the end of the study period, the L-carnitine-treated
patients showed significant improvements compared with the placebo
group. The following decreased: oxidized LDL levels; LDL
cholesterol; triglycerides; and apolipoprotein A1 concentrations.
Carnitine appears to be an additional supplement to be
potentially beneficial in those who have diabetes. A dosage of 250 mg a day or
500 mg three times a week is a good option. See
http://www.raysahelian.com/carnitine.html
Emails
Q. Can you explain to me the term "herbal
extract." How does one know the potency of an extract and whether it
is good or
not from the label, besides trying it. Also one more question about ratio
4:1 or what ever, what
does that mean. Is it a health issue or a danger to take it say ratio
10:1 or higher.
A. Herbs can be used as a pure crushed powder or in more potent
forms such as extracts. There are many, many different companies that
make potent concentrations of various herbs and each one has
their own method of extraction, concentration, and processing. Therefore, the same
herb can have dozens of different extracts depending on how it is
manufactured. One example is tongkat ali herb. It comes as regular powder and also in
various extract potencies such as 10 to 1, 20 to 1, 50 to 1, and higher. In order to know
which herbal extract concentration is more effective, each extract has to be
tested in humans and compared to another extract potency. Since few such studies
have been done, this makes the whole issue very complicated. Therefore, the only good way to know which herb is
useful to a person and in what extract potency is for the individual
to try it in different
dosages and extract potencies. It is not possible to tell from the supplement fact panel
on the label whether one particular extract is better for you than
another one. A 10 to 1 extract is more
concentrated than a 4 to 1 extract but this does not mean the stronger
one is necessarily better suited for the condition you are treating.
Furthermore, one company may claim that their extract is a concentrated 10 to 1
whereas another company may have a 10 to 1 extract that happens to be much more
potent since their extraction method and process yields different concentrations
of the active ingredients. The whole
topic is very complicated and there are no simple answers, and few
universally accepted guidelines. The best way to find out is for you to try
different herbal extracts from different companies to see which one provides you
with the best improvement for your condition. Also keep in mind that some companies
may not be honest in their representation. They may claim their product is a
high potency extract whereas it may be a weaker version.
Q. Has there been any research on fish oil’s
blood thinning strength. I am 67 years old and taking one 81 mg
aspirin every other day. I plan to go from one 1,000 mg fish oil
capsule per day to three per day to hopefully enhance brain
efficiency. Will a 81 mg aspirin plus three 1,000 mg fish oil
capsules possibly cause a bleeding problem? What’s your opinion of
fish oil’s effect on the brain?
A. It is difficult to predict the blood thinning potential or
effect of aspirin and fish oils in any one individual without doing
testing since each person has a different reaction based on their
body chemistry, other supplements used, other medications taken, and diet. It is very rare
for fish oil supplements to cause a bleeding problem when used
alone. Aspirin alone can cause bleeding problems by itself and it is possible
that the combination with fish oils can thin the blood even more. Whether this will
result in a clinically obvious case of internal bleeding is
difficult to predict. Those who take Coumadin or Plavix should
notify their health care provider if they intend to take fish oil
capsules. Fish oils have important health benefits,
including improving brain function. See
http://www.raysahelian.com/bloodclot.html
Q. A few months ago you wrote about vitamin D
and you cautioned people not to take more than 1000 units a day
until more long term data are available. This note is just to let you know that
I have noticed a
side-effect of high vitamin D supplementation:
whole-body anxiety and restlessness. I acquired hypothyroidism due to destruction of
my thyroid by Hashimoto's autoimmune thyroiditis. The Hashimoto was
perhaps caused by gluten. I also acquired multiple nutritional
deficiencies as a result of gluten enteropathy. After getting off
gluten in 2003, the process of finding and fixing the many
nutritional deficiencies the enteropathy caused, has been lengthy.
Early in 2008 I discovered that taking vitamin D3 caused me to go
into hyperthyroidism. I had to lower my T4 dose from its high of
118mcg. After taking up to 3000 IU D3 daily for 5 months and finally
achieving D sufficiency at 50ng/ml, I dropped back to about 600 IU
vitamin D3 daily. Reducing the level of vitamin D supplementation,
improved the way I feel. Apparently high blood levels of vitamin D
are excitatory for me, because the 3000 IU vitamin D supplementation
had created a whole-body anxiety situation. It had also interfered
with my thyroid treatment. Taking T4 while I also had a high blood
level of D3 would cause intense anxiety, so I had throttled back my
T4 dose to a low level (usually 12mcg per day) that wasn't
sufficient to keep my TSH reasonably low and my FT3 and FT4 both
within the normal ranges. I have a friend whose son was put on high vitamin D
supplementation after he was found to have gluten sensitivity and
multiple deficiencies. The doc put him on a dose of 8000 IU D3 as
drops, once per week. When I talked to his mom about my experience
with high-dose vitamin D supplementation, she found it interesting.
She told me that when she gives her son his 8000 IU D3 on Sunday, he
acts "crazy" on Monday. So evidently I'm not the only person who
finds that high blood levels of vitamin D3 are excitatory.
A. This is interesting. I wonder if others have found very high
dosages of vitamin D to cause anxiety or have excitatory effects.
===================================
SUPPLEMENT RESEARCH UPDATE - by Ray Sahelian, M.D.
Vol. 6, Issue 5 -- May, 2009
===================================
PRODUCT DISCOUNTS at Physician Formulas -- For the next few days we are offering a free bottle of acai berry supplement. If you would like this bottle, click on the image and make sure you add it to your shopping cart. As a newsletter subscriber you are eligible to get this free bottle. We are also offering Eyesight Rx at a discount. This tablet is melted under the tongue and used every other day. Most users find Eyesight Rx improves day and night vision, enhances color perception, and also improves near and distant vision. It takes a few days for the benefits to be noticed. In addition, this product supplies a number of beneficial nutrients and antioxidants for long term eye health.
Red yeast rice and fish oils as good as statin drugs
for cholesterol
Pharmaceutical companies have a great deal of money to promote their cholesterol
lowering drugs such as Lipitor and Zocor. Yet there are quite a number of
natural alternatives that may be just, or more, effective, cheaper, and safer.
Unfortunately these natural options are rarely mentioned by the media which
seems to repeat whatever news release is put out by the drug companies regarding
the results of the studies they have funded. The results of many such studies
may not reliable or accurate. Here is a quote from an article. "Many medical studies simply are not
accurate. Further, the media is known to distort key aspects of medical studies,
twisting findings by virtue of ignorance, blowing obscure, unpublished
"breakthroughs" out of proportion, and frequently failing to disclose industry
funding even when the researchers do mention it."
In a study conducted at Chestnut
Hill Hospital, University of Pennsylvania Health System, in Philadelphia, PA,
investigators wanted to compared the lipid-lowering effects of a lifestyle changes, red yeast rice, and fish oil
with a standard dose of a cholesterol lowering statin drug called Zocor. There was a significant
and equal reduction in LDL-Cholesterol levels in both groups. The patients
taking the natural supplements had a higher reductions in triglycerides levels
than those on taking the drug (-29% vs -9%).
Comments: We get emails from doctors who practice conventional
medicine criticizing me for not promoting statin drugs. Many doctors think they
are doing their patients a favor by staring them on these medications even if
their cholesterol levels are mildly high. I wish these doctors spent more time
reviewing the research regarding the benefits of natural products to help with
cholesterol management. They would realize that many options are available that
are cheaper and safer. See
http://www.raysahelian.com/cholesterol.html and
http://www.raysahelian.com/redyeastrice.html
Soy controversy revisited
Q. I have been reading your newsletter for a
couple of years and truly appreciate the honesty and avoidance of hype. I read
on a website that soy ingestion is harmful to health but the writer of the
article did not seem to present any good research. Has your opinion changed from
a year or two ago regarding the safety of soy consumption?
A. I still hold to my position that the occasional consumption of
soy foods, in reasonable amounts and preferably organically grown, should not be
a concern and may even have some positive benefits. A recent analysis by
investigators at Grand Forks Human Nutrition Research Center, Agricultural
Research Service, US Department of Agriculture, Grand Forks, ND, and the
Department of Mathematics, Washington University, St Louis, MO., found soy
consumption reduced the risk for prostate cancer, see http://www.raysahelian.com/prostatecancer.html.
Another study found soy consumption reduced the risk of colon cancer in women,
see
http://www.raysahelian.com/coloncancer.html. I know many older people who
have been eating soy products regularly for most of their life and they are in
good health. I don't see why some web sites claim that consumption of even small
amounts of soy products to be toxic and a danger. It just does not make sense to
me.
Fish oils improve mood in those with
Parkinson's disease
Brazilian researchers gave fish oil pills for a period of three
months to patients with Parkinson's disease who were diagnosed with
depression. The patients taking fish oil supplements had
improvements in their depressive symptoms. Fish oils are also
helpful in women after menopause in terms of mood elevations, see
http://www.raysahelian.com/menopause.html.
Comments: It is not clear how fish oils would interact,
if any, with medications currently used for PD. I don't suspect
taking 3 or 4 fish oil capsules would interfere with these
medications. Mucuna pruriens is an herb that is recommended by some
doctors for PD. I don't think there would be a problem combining the
fish oils and mucuna pills. See
http://www.raysahelian.com/parkinson.html for more information
and discuss with your doctor before making changes to your
medication regimen.
Emails
Q. I am having an argument with my wife. My
point of view is that housework helps the heart, just like exercise, stay
healthier and can help one live longer while she thinks it has no influence. Who
is right?
A. There was a recent study in the American Journal of Epidemiology
that found the time people spend doing housework such as scrubbing floors or
cleaning windows and gardening does not seem to make a strong influence on heart
health, but it can reduce mortality. Any kind of movement is better than being
sedentary and sitting on a couch watching TV. See
http://www.raysahelian.com/exercise.html
Q. I am interested in routinely
measuring / tracking my blood antioxidant level. What are your
thoughts on the value of this?
A. I do not see any clinical value in knowing one's antioxidant
status through blood studies unless there is a specific medical
condition or disease that needs to be evaluated and monitored with
this method. Just do your best in eating as healthy as possible with
a wide variety of fruits and vegetables, along with herbs and
spices. You may also consider taking certain supplements that
provide antioxidant protection, and a list is included on this page
http://www.raysahelian.com/antioxidant.html.
Q. There are a lot of myths out there on cod liver oil
and where it comes from. How does one know he or she are getting a superior
product when purchasing cod liver oil supplements and that there are no toxins
or pollutants? Are all cod liver oil supplements basically the same? Is it
necessary to take a vitamin D supplement if taking cod liver oil?
A. There are a number of companies that sell cod liver oil
supplements. It is not possible for the consumer to know which is
the best product unless the consumer sends a sample pill to a lab for analysis. This is not practical. Furthermore, even
if one buys the cod liver oil bottles from the same company, over
time, each batch could be different depending on where the fish were
caught and how the oil was extracted and processed. If a person is
very concerned, one option is to buy a cod liver oil product from a
different company each time a new bottle is needed thus not relying
on one source in case that particular source happens to be inferior.
You could alternate two, three or four sources. As to vitamin D,
each person has a different requirement depending on diet and sun
exposure. Check to see how much vitamin D is in the cod liver oil
supplement you are taking, add it to any other sources of vitamin D
you are getting from supplements, such as multivitamin pills or
calcium / vitamin D pills, and dairy products, and limit your overall intake to less
than 1000 units a day. See
http://www.raysahelian.com/codliveroil.html
Q. I have read with interest your take on potential problems with
higher supplemental doses of Vitamin D and calcium as discussed in a
previous newsletter. I have been diagnosed with very low bone
density and, at the time of diagnosis, my blood level of vitamin D
(25-OH) was 10 nanograms per ml (optimal is 20 to 60). I have
subsequently -- and under monitoring -- taken 4,000 I.U. of vitamin
D3 and still only managed to raise my levels to 39. I am now taking
5,000 I.U. and due to be tested soon. If even "heroic" doses of
vitamin D3 are merely maintaining what are considered desirable
levels, can these doses still pose potential health problems?
A. It's difficult to say. Blood levels of vitamin D, or many other
vitamins, may not necessarily reflect what is actually going on in
bone tissue, brain tissue, or other parts of the body. Many doctors
overly rely on blood levels to determine the proper dosage of
vitamins, drugs, and hormones, but blood tests do not always reflect
accurately the levels or effects of these medications in various
tissues of the body or what is actually going on within each cell.
There could be a normal level of the vitamin or medication in the
blood stream yet untoward effects could be going on in some part of
the body. For instance, if a person takes DHEA hormone and their
blood test shows the level to be within the normal range, it is
possible that the levels in hair tissue could be high causing hair
loss. Same with vitamin D. It is possible that blood levels could be
low or normal, yet untoward reactions could be occurring in other
tissues, such as brain tissue.
===================================
SUPPLEMENT RESEARCH UPDATE - by Ray Sahelian, M.D.
Vol. 6, Issue 4 -- April, 2009
===================================
I was recently interviewed for a Newswire
article on stevia, the natural herbal sweetener. This plant has leaves
which contain compounds that are more than 200 times sweeter than table sugar
but have no calories. Stevia has been available in the USA since the mid
to late 1990s, but the FDA did not allow it to be called a sweetener, it
could only be called a dietary supplement. In other words the label on
stevia products, whether in liquid form or powder, could not say that it
could be used as a sweetener. Interestingly, a couple of years ago, when
large companies such as Coke and Pepsi approached the FDA and asked to
use a stevia extract in their drinks, suddenly attitudes changed at the
administration and now stevia is allowed to be called a sweetener. This
plant can be used by children and those who have diabetes. More about
this later.
To celebrate stevia's new status as a government-sanctified safe
sweetener, an offer of a free bottle of stevia liquid is being made for
the next few days to all subscribers of the newsletter. This bottle is
normally sold for 14.95. This liquid is
my favorite. I use 3 or 4 drops in my herbal teas each morning. I have
been doing so safely for over a decade. You can also add it to coffee.
Kids will love lemonade sweetened with stevia. This sweetener is also
available in packets, powder, chewing gum and lime-flavored packets that
you can add to a pint of water for a calorie-free delicious iced drink,
especially appreciated during warm days.
I was introduced to stevia in the late 1990s by a friend. We were at a restaurant in Los Angeles and before we ordered from the menu she requested the waiter to bring a few cut lemon pieces and a glass of water. She then proceeded to squeeze the lemons in the water and asked me to taste. Of course it was sour. She then added a few drops of stevia liquid. I could not believe how such a small amount of an herbal extract could immediately turn the sourness into such a delicious lemonade. I was so impressed that it prompted me to co-author a book with her called The Stevia Cookbook. I researched the history of the plant and all the safety studies while she worked on the recipes. After reviewing multi-generational studies done in rodents in high dosages where this plant was fount to be non-toxic and safe, and realizing that some countries such as Japan had been using stevia in their foods since the 1970s without any ill effects, I was convinced that this sweetener was safe. However, I was puzzled that the FDA claimed that it had concerns about its safety and would not allow it to be called a sweetener. Over the years stevia gradually became more popular in alternative health circles but it was not until the FDA changed its mind in 2008, and Coke and Pepsi began adding it in their drinks, that catapulted stevia to its new famed status. You are soon likely to find a number of foods, drinks, nutrition bars and other products to include stevia. There are a number of companies that sell stevia extracts and not all of them are of good quality. Some stevia product may have a bitter aftertaste. After searching for several years, I came across a stevia clear liquid product that has become my favorite and is being offered as a free bottle for the next few days. For fascinating information about this whole topic, see http://www.raysahelian.com/stevia.html. See also an article that was sent over the Newswire where I was quoted, http://jscms.jrn.columbia.edu/cns/2009-03-17/solash-steviasweetener
Combining prebiotics and probiotics helps those
with ulcerative colitis
There is growing optimism that a combination of probiotics, which are
friendly gut bacteria, and prebiotics, certain complex carbohydrate
substances that stimulate the growth of friendly bacteria in the gut,
work together quite well in treating certain medical conditions.
Japanese researchers at Nippon Medical School in Tokyo discovered that
patients with ulcerative colitis on a combination prebiotic and
probiotic therapy
experienced greater quality-of-life changes than patients on either
treatment alone. See
http://www.raysahelian.com/ulcerativecolitis.html
and
http://www.raysahelian.com/probiotics.html
Melatonin helps children with autism sleep
better
Dr. Beth L. Goodlin-Jones, at the University of
California Davis Health System in Sacramento, gave children,
ranging in age from 2 to 15 years, melatonin 3 mg nightly for two weeks
and compared them to a placebo group. These children had autistic spectrum disorder
and/or fragile X syndrome. Reports from children who completed the
study showed that use of this natural hormone led to improvements in
total night sleep durations, sleep latency times and sleep-onset times.
Comments: For long term use I suggest no more than half or 1 mg of
melatonin for a maximum of three
nights a week. I am concerned that if parents give 3 mg nightly for many
weeks or months tolerance could develop or side effects could occur. It
is possible that even a third of a mg used two to three hours before bed
could also be effective. See
http://www.raysahelian.com/autism.html and
http://www.raysahelian.com/melatonin.html
Raw or cooked broccoli?
Eat your vegetables, raw. Although some vegetables are more appropriate
eaten cooked, it appears that an active anti-cancer substance in
broccoli, called sulforaphane, is destroyed when this vegetable is
cooked. Researchers in The Netherlands asked eight men to eat 200 grams of crushed broccoli, raw or
cooked, with a warm meal. Higher amounts of sulforaphane were found in the blood and urine
when broccoli was eaten raw (bioavailability of 37%) versus cooked (3%).
See http://www.raysahelian.com/sulforaphane.html
Emails
I am sensitive to doses and I have found, in
the past, that the usual market doses are too strong for me. For
example, I used to take CoQ10 30 mg everyday but found after a
few days it was too stimulating. So I resorted to taking it every second
day but I would prefer taking a smaller dose, say 10 mg, everyday. The
same thing with R Alpha Lipoic acid. I would like trying a dose of about
5 mg to begin with but the smallest dose available is 50 mg. Can the
capsule be emptied into a container with, say orange juice, and mixed
and one can consume a prescribed fraction of that juice each day. Or will
putting these supplements into a juice and leaving in the refrigerator
for a few days destroy the supplement?
It is certainly okay to open a capsule of a supplement
and use a portion. I would say for most supplements it should not be a
problem to keep them two to five days in juice in the refrigerator although I
would prefer not much longer. Another option is to open a capsule, pour
out some of it, and then close the capsule. Most capsules can be
opened by twisting and pulling on each end. I encourage people who are
sensitive to use smaller amounts. One
of the most important things to recognize about taking a medication or
supplement is that there is a wide range of dosages that are
appropriate. For instance, we have had feedback from Passion Rx users
that a third of a capsule taken for a few days works, whereas others say they
need a capsule and a half or two capsules for several days to notice an effect.
There are some people who notice an effect from a supplement or
prescription drug that is a tenth as small as someone else who has a
high threshold.
Q. I recently read an article that said drinking yerba mate tea
Increases cancer risk. Can you comment on this article, here is an
excerpt, "Yerba mate, the South American tea gaining popularity among
the health-conscious and caffeine-shy, may be linked to significantly
increased rates of some cancers, according to new studies. Some studies
have linked the brew to possible reductions in heart disease and cancer.
In lab tests, the herb helped protect heart and liver cells against
stress. In rats, it lowered blood pressure and kept fat from
accumulating in blood vessels. But scientists warned that tests in labs
and on rats don't necessarily translate into the same human results. In
fact, a 1994 study found mate drinkers had a 60 percent higher chance of
contracting respiratory or digestive cancers than non-mate drinkers. Two
years later, another study, of 1,000 Uruguayan men, found those who
drank yerba mate regularly had a 60 percent higher chance of developing
lung cancer than non-tea drinkers."
A. It is possible that daily drinking of yerba mate may
increase the risk for cancer and I am not about to question the results
of these studies without additional information. However, as a practical
and reasonable suggestion, people should not drink the same tea daily. I
have at least a dozen tea boxes on my kitchen counter and I alternate
their use. Some of the ones I use include ginger, peppermint, chamomile, rooibos,
Earl Grey, licorice, green tea, black tea, and a few others, including
yerba mate. By drinking
different teas, you will get a variety of beneficial polyphenols and
other substances, and avoid repetitive exposure to substances that are
harmful to the body if ingested in excess. Based on my reviews of the
medical literature, I feel very confident that yerba mate tea is safe
when used a few times a month.
Q. I am confused about conflicting information
I've read about probiotics. Some sources say you must take
enteric-coated capsules so that the probiotics will bypass the stomach
and stomach acid (which they say destroys the probiotics) and be
released in the intestines. Other sources say that stomach acid does not
destroy the probiotics and that enteric-coated capsules are an
unnecessarily expensive method of getting your probiotics. What is the
truth?
A. I asked Dr. S.K. Dash, President of UAS Laboratories, Inc
and producer of a product called DDS-Probiotics. He is an expert on
this topic and the author of "The Consumer's Guide to Probiotics." He
said, "Probiotics made by reliable companies are acid and bile resistant
(97%). Not only do they pass through stomach acid, they implant in the
intestine, producing digestive enzymes, vitamins, lactic acid and
natural antibiotics. Selection of the right probiotic strain is the key
to success of a probiotic supplement. DDS-Probiotics do not need enteric
coating. All probiotics are not same. Some weaker strains may need
enteric coating."
Q. I am medical doctor. This is my first visit to your website and I found
the information to be good and reasonable and the advice given on
supplements very sound. I particularly appreciate the way you advise a
lower rather than higher dose as well as to stop and start or take
supplements on a few days a week. This has been my experience also with
my patients and I find many manufacturers as well as sellers of health
products happily telling their clients to keep taking their products
causing iatrogenic illnesses caused by an excess exposure to the
supplements.
Q. I have no illness but I take many herbal products which are also blood thinners such as
ginkgo biloba, green tea extract, grape seed extract, fish oil
and a few others. I try take them at various times of the day. I wanted to know if
taking a lot of blood thinners can thin the blood too much and be a
risk. How can I tell the potency of any herbal blood thinner so to avoid
a bleeding problem?
A. Research regarding the potency of different herbs and supplements in
terms of blood thinning potential has not been extensive and we don't
know as much as we need to know. The blood thinning potential of
supplements also depends on the dosage used. One good way to tell how
all of these blood thinning supplements are working is to get a blood
test to measure your overall blood clotting ability. The blood thinning
effect of some supplements may only last a few hours while others may
have an effect for several days. As a practical matter, though, it is
very rare to have a serious bleeding problem with the use of natural
supplements unless they are combined with aspirin, Plavix, Coumadin, or
other prescription blood thinning medications.
A potent natural anti clotting product is nattokinase and this enzyme
should be used with medical supervision.
===================================
SUPPLEMENT RESEARCH UPDATE - by Ray Sahelian, M.D.
Vol. 6, Issue 3 -- March, 2009
===================================
Have you heard of maca herb? Maca is a plant native to the high Andes of Peru
and Bolivia and used by locals as a root vegetable and as a medicinal herb.
I came across two new studies with this herb and its aphrodisiac properties. I
really appreciate coming across studies with these herbs on humans rather than
relying on the interpretation of results from animals or lab studies. For
centuries and millennia indigenous tribes have known about locally grown roots,
herbs, barks, and other natural substances that have sexual enhancing
properties, yet modern science is still skeptical that these herbs work. I think
over the next few years, as more data becomes available, doctors, the media, and
scientists will begin to realize and accept that natural aphrodisiacs are
effective. Most of these herbs take a few days or up to two weeks to work as
opposed to Viagra and its cousins that take a few hours. But the herbs are safer
and enhance the overall sexual experience, sensation, libido, orgasms, etc,
rather than the purely mechanical aspects of blood vessel dilation. If the first
herb or formula does not work for you, try one or two others. Eventually,
through trial and error, you will find a single herb, or a combination, that
will revive some of the passion you thought had long gone.
In the last issue of the newsletter I discussed bio-identical
hormones and hormone replacement therapy. Just about all the feedback on this
topic was positive and most people appreciated my balanced viewpoint that
pointed out the benefits and unknown risks.
The home page of my website has an index of three or four hundred
topics. However, there are about 2000 pages on this site. If you are looking for
a particular topic not listed on the home page, you can google, yahoo, or msn my
last name followed by a space and then the keyword. Example: sahelian ginkgo.
PRODUCT DISCOUNTS - We are providing a 10 percent discount to our customers for the next few days. All the items at PhysicianFormulas.com website are on sale for an additional 10 percent off on top of the existing discounts, including the bestselling formulas Passion Rx, Diet Rx, Mind Power Rx, Joint Power Rx, Prostate Power Rx, MultiVit Rx, and Eyesight Rx. As a newsletter subscriber you are eligible to get this discount. After you add the products to your cart, type the word spring in the discount code provided and then click update below it. If you have questions, call the customer care representatives at the number listed on the website.
Maca as a mild aphrodisiac
There were two interesting studies I came across recently. The first one shows
maca has a small benefit in men with impotence, and the second one shows maca to
be helpful in reversing some of the sexual dysfunction associated with the use
antidepressant medications.
Italian scientists at the Department of Urology, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, in Forlì, Italy, wanted to find out the effects of maca extract on well-being and sexual performances in patients with mild erectile dysfunction. They gave 50 men with mild erectile dysfunction (ED), maca dry extract, 2400 mg a day and compared them to a placebo group. After three months, those on maca experienced a significant improvement in physical and social performance-related sexual score compared to those who did not receive the herb. They say, "Our data support a small but significant effect of maca supplementation on subjective perception of general and sexual well-being in adult patients with mild ED.
In the second study, Dr. Dording and colleagues at the Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, in Boston, wanted to find out whether maca is helpful in patients who have sexual dysfunction as a result of taking SSRI drugs for depression. SSRI drugs, such as Paxil, Zoloft, and Prozac, influence serotonin activity in the brain. Excess serotonin inhibits sexuality. One group received 1.5 g/day and another group took 3 grams a day. Those taking 3 grams a day had a reversal of their dysfunction. They conclude, "Maca root may alleviate SSRI-induced sexual dysfunction, and there may be a dose-related effect. Maca may also have a beneficial effect on libido."
My comments: I like maca herb and I have personally noticed a mild sexual enhancement and energy from it. But, in my opinion, it is not as potent as some other herbs such as tribulus, mucuna, horny goat weed, catuaba, muira puama, yohimbe, and tongkat ali. Maca is a gentle herb and perhaps it may be safer to use in those with SSRI induced sexual problems. It is possible that low dosages of other herbs may also be effective and not cause unpleasant interactions with the medications. If you take any prescription medications or hormones, or are over the age of 50, have mild high blood pressure, be careful when using aphrodisiac herbs and always begin with low dosages for a few days. If the small amounts are not effective, then you can increase the dosage little by little. Have approval by your health care provider. If you have moderate to severe high blood pressure or a heart condition, it may be best not to use these herbs since they can increase heart rate and in very high amounts cause heart rhythm disturbances. See http://www.raysahelian.com/maca.html
Cranberry almost as good as an antibiotic for UTI prevention
Scottish researchers wanted to know how cranberry extract compared to low-dose trimethoprim (an antibiotic) in the prevention of recurrent urinary tract infections (UTIs) in older women. For a period of six months, 137 women with two or more antibiotic-treated UTIs in the previous 12 months were randomized to receive either 500 mg of cranberry extract or 100 mg of trimethoprim. The average time to recurrence of UTI was 84 days for the cranberry group and 91 days for the trimethoprim group. Trimethoprim had a small advantage over cranberry extract in the prevention of recurrent UTIs in older women but had more adverse effects. They say, "Our finding will allow older women with recurrent UTIs to discuss with their clinicians the inherent attractions of a cheap, natural product like cranberry extract whose use does not carry the risk of antimicrobial resistance or super-infection with Clostridium difficile or fungi. See http://www.raysahelian.com/cranberry.html
Emails
Q. My
husband and I have a son who is a high-functioning autistic. He also
developed type 1 diabetes as an adult. In a report my husband and I read
on the Internet, you mentioned a nutrient, L-Carnosine to help type 1 diabetics and said it
also helped brain function in autistics.
We decided to try it and told our son we had something we thought might help
his diabetes. Within a couple of weeks, he became much more talkative
(he's a very quiet person and usually keeps his opinions to himself) and
began voicing his political opinions. It was obvious he had put quite a
bit of thought in them. Friends began noticing how much more he was
talking with them and not immediately retreating to his room when they
came to visit. And to prove it wasn't all in our heads, his
endocrinologist has lowered his insulin twice since he began taking the
L-Carnosine. So, thanks for pointing us in that direction.
See
http://www.raysahelian.com/autism.html
Q. I
started taking St. John's wort recently to help with menopause
depression. I took a German preparation which was a single
900 mg tablet in the morning for a week. I was waking frequently in the
night, but knew that insomnia was a potential side effect. My doctor took my blood pressure. I
am normally quite normal. My blood pressure was an astronomical 180
/ 100. I could not think why, and then later did some research online
that seemed to indicate this could be a side effect of St. John's wort. I had the same experience when taking licorice. I must be very
sensitive. I stopped taking the St. John's wort and feel quite a bit
better. I haven't had my blood pressure checked but will do so soon,
however I am sure it is back to normal as I don't feel so anxious and
fluttery. I realize there are lots of studies to show that St. John's wort does not affect blood pressure. Unfortunately the studies
clearly do not cover cases like myself. I thought you and others
should know.
A.
In my
opinion, 900 mg of St. John's wort extract is quite a high dosage even
though most studies have used this high amount. I prefer to prescribe
300 mg of St. John's wort extract and even reduce the frequency of use
to every other day once the benefits begin. Insomnia is a side effect of
St. John's wort on high dosages. See
http://www.raysahelian.com/stjohn.html
Q. Dear Dr.
Sahelian,
I appreciate your objective approach to hormone replacement therapy. My wife has been using
bio identical progesterone for a number of years and has seen a great
reduction of PMS and peri-menstrual acne. I recognize that her results
are subjective and anecdotal.
Unfortunately I don't foresee a U.S. peer reviewed study of bio
identical hormones in the future because American pharmaceutical
companies dictate where the research will be directed and non-prescription approaches to medical treatment is simply not profitable
enough for them.
Q. First, thank you for your informative web site
and the one you consult for physician formulas. They
exhibit an unusual amount of objectivity about the various supplements.
Recently, I was reading a page and was struck by the fact that it said
"Take this capsule several times a week." Naturally, supplement
manufacturers or doctors who consult for them, have an underlying
conflict of interest regarding dosage and frequency - the more often a
customer takes the supplement, the more often they will buy a new
bottle. So, it is no surprise that in decades of taking vitamins and
supplements, I have never seen one that does not list the word "daily"
in the recommendations. In fact, the original mass marketed vitamin was
called "Once A Day". Most supplements state " 1-3 times daily " on the
label. It would be of great benefit if you could write a separate
article for your web site that would list which supplements are not
necessary or helpful to take every day.
A. I appreciate your email. My first concern, and that of the folks at Advance Physician
Formulas, is to provide supplements that are helpful for people with the
most benefits and fewest side effects. Having tested supplements on
myself for over 30 years, I recognize that some of them can have cumulative
effects, and whereas it was beneficial at first to take them daily, after a
while side effects occurred with continued use. As such I believe that it is
sometimes, or often, better to take these pills less frequently as I have
suggested the folks at APF, whom I consult for, to be cautious in their dosage
suggestions and err on the side of suggesting people take less, not more. See
the next email as an example of why some of these supplements should not be
taken daily.
We feel that if customers are
happy, they will come back to shop again. A company can make a profit in
the vitamin industry while being honest and not greedy. See
http://www.physicianformulas.com/store/Scripts/prodview.asp?idproduct=224&name=NEWSLETTER
and scroll down half way down the page for suggestions on how often to
take certain supplements.
Q. I started on a dosage of 400 mg
SAM-e supplement daily and after a week felt like I was going insane. So
I decided to step down the dosage to 50 mg. It seems though like the 400
mg week long course almost acted like a loading dose. Even stopping for
3 days and trying 50 mg immediately brought me back to the same symptoms
I was feeling before - shortness of breath, anxiety, anger, etc. Every
time I try and re-challenge with the 50 mg tablet the symptoms come back.
This is weird since the 400 mg dose was fine for the most part of a
week. It could just be I am just sensitive to the SAM-e effects. I also
take daily mega doses of B vitamins which could also be extending its
effects.
A. Once the body is loaded up with certain herbs or supplements,
smaller amounts can trigger the same effects as higher amounts. This
occurs with SAM-e and B vitamins could enhance the effects. This is also
true of aphrodisiac herbs. It may take a few days to notice the initial
benefits, but the effects are noticed much quicker after taking a pill once
there is enough of the herbs in the body.
See
http://www.raysahelian.com/sam-e.html
Q. This is in regards to dosage instructions on supplement bottles. I
would like to know why a rhodiola supplement bottle I bought has
instructions that states to use it twice a day, usually before breakfast
and dinner on an empty stomach. Can you tell me what the reason is for 2
separated doses instead of taking the rhodiola herbal extract once a
day?
A. There are many rhodiola products on the market and they have
different instructions written on the bottle in terms of how to use this
herb. There are several reasons for this. Often not enough human
research is available to determine the best way to take, the best
timing, and the ideal dosage of these herbal supplements. Also, many or
most of the instructions on bottles of supplements are not written by
doctors or herbal specialists, but are written by company staff,
marketers, promoters, or others with minimal nutritional knowledge, who
may have no clue on how to take supplements and thus will write the
instructions on dosage and usage based on little solid scientific
evidence or practical knowledge. As a general rule, I prefer rhodiola
being taken once in the morning but there are others with different
opinions. Certain herbs and supplements can cause insomnia if taken late
in the day.
===================================
SUPPLEMENT RESEARCH UPDATE - by Ray Sahelian, M.D.
Vol. 6, Issue 2 -- February, 2009
===================================
We had an unprecedented number of email
responses to the last issue of the newsletter. Here is one example: "The January 2009 newsletter Supplement
Research Update discusses the disastrous effects of conjugated equine
estrogens and synthetic progestins uncovered by the Women’s Health
Initiative study in terms of increasing breast cancer risk. My understanding is that the WHI did not study the use of
bio-identical human estrogens and progesterone at all. Everything I’ve
read indicates that they have a completely different effect on women’s
bodies, and in fact progesterone (the real thing, not synthetic progestins) may be
protective against breast cancer."
Over the past few decades doctors have prescribed horse-derived
estrogens and synthetic progestins to women in order to relieve menopausal
symptoms and as a way to potentially reduce the risk for osteoporosis or heart
disease. A few years ago doctors began suspecting that, in many or most women,
the harm from this treatment in terms of increased breast cancer risk and heart
disease risk outweighs the benefits. Many women stopped taking these
medications, others turned to herbs and supplements, and still others turned to
natural hormones such as bioidentical hormones. Many of you may not be familiar
with this term. Bioidentical hormones differ from traditional hormone
replacement therapy since they are chemically identical to hormones found within
the body -- such as estradiol and progesterone -- rather than molecules that are
similar, but not identical to human hormones (such as Premarin, derived from the
urine of pregnant horses) or synthetic progestins (such as medroxyprogesterone).
Many women believe that these bioidentical natural hormones are safe, or safer.
These bioidentical hormones are promoted by compounding pharmacists, some
alternative medicine practitioners and even a celebrity, Suzanne Somers.
Estradiol is also available in many FDA-approved pills, patches, creams and gels
from traditional pharmaceutical companies. Is there evidence to support the
safety or superiority of bioidentical hormones over standard hormone replacement
approaches? I will focus most of this newsletter on this important issue.
PRODUCT DISCOUNTS at Physician Formulas -- For the next few days all subscribers are eligible to a FREE bottle of CoQ10 50 mg, a value of 10 dollars. CoQ10 is an antioxidant used for energy and cardiovascular health. CoQ10 at 50 mg is a good dose for those who wish to take this popular nutrient a few times a week without overdosing. The following products are on sale: Prostate Power Rx is a popular herbal formula for prostate health. Life Greens and Berries powder is a new formula that has dozens of extracts of fruits, vegetables, mushrooms, herbs, all with a high ORAC antioxidant value. Bioperine is a pure form of piperine, derived from the fruits of black pepper. Cinnamon 6 is a combination of several herbs to help with blood sugar management. Vitamin C, Ester C is always a popular vitamin, especially during the winter season.
Chondroitin, glucosamine and quercetin
helpful for
osteoarthritis
A new 2009 Japanese study finds a combination supplement of 1200 mg glucosamine hydrochloride,
100 mg of chondroitin (from 300 mg shark cartilage), and
45 mg of quercetin, taken daily, is helpful as a treatment
for osteoarthritis. Forty-six osteoarthritis and twenty-two
rheumatoid
arthritis patients were given the glucosamine chondroitin
quercetin supplement orally for 3 months. The
osteoarthritis patients showed a significant improvement in pain
symptoms, daily activities (walking and climbing up and down stairs),
and changes in the synovial fluid properties. No such effects
were observed in the rheumatoid arthritis patients.
Comments: Over the past few years there have been numerous studies
regarding the role of glucosamine and chondroitin as a treatment for
osteoarthritis. Most, but not all, studies show these natural nutrients
to have a benefit. Quercetin supplements are available by themselves and
can be taken together with a joint formula that has chondroitin and
glucosamine. See
http://www.raysahelian.com/osteoarthritis.html
Hormone replacement controversies
Here are some of the emails we received and my responses.
Q. I think your information is great, but I
strongly disagree regarding estrogen / progestin. First of all, both
Premarin and progestins should be against the law, as we women are not
horses and synthetic progestins are carcinogenic. However, bioidentical
hormones are a different breed and I have been on them (low dose) for
the last 5 years. I don't even think about cancer. I eat a very strict,
clean, mostly organic diet and go to an MD who knows what he's doing.
Yes, Western medicine is the problem---still giving women Premarin and
progestins---it's a disgrace how mishandled most women are today at the
hands of misinformed and arrogant doctors who don't want to learn what's
new and better.
A. All doctors, including me, are fallible and have the potential
to make mistakes or give wrong advice. In the past few decades many doctors were
just as assured and
complacent of the safety of hormone replacement therapy with PremPro as
many bioidentical hormone promoters are today. There are currently no
long term studies with bioidentical hormones to prove their safety.
Q. Dear Dr. S, the horse urine estrogen and
synthetic progestin that have been fed to women world wide has been
the problem, not bioidentical estrogen and progesterone. I am 63, was never able to take the horse urine
product without feeling ill, so I didn't, even after my hysterectomy at
33 with the inevitable negative results for my bones. Five years ago, my doctor started me on a bio-identical
estrogen patch, along with additional magnesium and bio-identical
topical progesterone cream. My annual DEXA scans have shown an amazing
gain in bone strength, this includes both hip and spine. I
no longer expect to end up with dissolving bones which is what other
doctors have stated is the fate of most people who live to be
very old. Since people in my family lines normally
die between 85 and 95, I have been concerned about osteoporosis because
the folks who did die earlier usually died from the results of a broken
hip. It wasn't fast, usually a year, and it wasn't pleasant and isn't
solved by hip replacement. The fact is bio-identical estrogen and
progesterone protect your bones from osteoporosis. The incidence of some
form of osteoporosis in the aged is very high. Which means MOST people
will get osteoporosis. MOST WOMEN DON'T GET CANCER.... MOST WOMEN
DO GET OSTEOPOROSIS. A relatively low percentage of women get cancer and
die from it.
A. This email summarizes one of the basic dilemmas regarding the
benefits versus the risks of hormone replacement therapy. Does the
benefit of decreased bone fractures outweigh potential harm from an
increased cancer rate, heart attack, stroke, or other problems that are
related to hormone replacement therapy? Would having an adequate intake
of calcium and vitamin D, along with exercise and weight training reduce
or eliminate the need for hormone replacement? Science does not have the full
answers at this time.
Q. In your Jan. 2009 newsletter, you site an
MSNBC news article that reports taking menopause hormones for five years
doubles one's risk of breast cancer. The article clearly stated that the
hormones studied were horse estrogen and synthetic progestin ingested by
mouth. This is quite different than applying a cream of bio-identical
hormones. It may be that these creams increase the risk, as well, but
that is not part of the referenced study, and many contemporary studies
indicate otherwise.
A. Until long term studies are done testing bio-identical
hormones in terms of their effect on breast cancer and how they compare
to synthetic progestins and conjugated equine estrogens, it is premature
to claim that one form has less risk than the other. What if
bioidentical hormones end up being even more potent in stimulating
certain cancers than synthetic progestins or equine estrogens? It took
decades for the medical community to find out the full risks of hormone
replacement and it may take a long time for women who are currently
taking bioidentical hormones, under premature safety assurances by many
natural hormone marketers and promoters, to find out that these
medications have risks that we are currently not aware of. I did mention
in the newsletter
that if you were to use hormones as symptomatic relief for menopausal
symptoms, my current impression is that it would be preferable to use natural
hormones. If you are aware of long term studies regarding the safety of
natural hormone use, please let us know.
Q. I received Dr. Sahelian’s January 2009
newsletter article with his comments on using estrogens and progestins
to help with menopause symptoms. I feel it is very important to point
out that the HRT used in the WHI study contained horse estrogen which is
not the same as human estradiol now available in products such as
Estrace and the Vivelle patch. While the horse estrogen does bind to
human estrogen receptors, it does not have the same action as the human
estradiol, ie. It fits in the lock but you can’t turn the key. Also,
since the human body doesn’t have the enzymes necessary to break down
the horse estrogen, it can stay in the body attached to the receptors
for several months. Human estradiol is essentially out of the body in
2 days after you stop treatment. I have
read several books and studies indicating that replacing a women’s estradiol with the so called bioidentical estradiol is very beneficial.
I personally have found this to be the case.
A. Scientists do get important clues by studying the effect of
these hormones on receptors in a laboratory, but until actual human studies are done for
several years with natural estrogens in varying dosages, their
safety will not be known to their
full extent. When ingested orally these hormones are altered by the
liver before they make it to the cells. Therefore, cell studies in a
laboratory do not give us the full picture. Also, what if we find out
someday that natural hormones stimulate cancers in certain tissues of
the body more potently that the horse estrogens? At this time we don't
have any long terms studies that compare bioidentical hormones to
Premarin.
Other points to keep in mind:
How do we know the right dosages for these bioidentical hormones in terms of
long term use? How many years should one take them? When should one stop using
them?
How do we know which form of estrogen is best: estriol, estradiol, estrone, and
in what proportions? How do we know whether slow steady release / absorption of
these hormones is better or worse that a quick absorption with a high peak and
low valley?
How are we to know for sure whether compounding pharmacies are preparing the
correct bioidentical hormones since there is little or no oversight?
How do we know which is better, oral or topical hormone use?
How do we know whether saliva testing is reliable? How is one to know the right
hormone dosage to use based on saliva testing or blood testing? There is little
evidence that a blood level or saliva level of a hormone can predict exactly the
actual hormone amount a woman needs to take. The dosage of these hormones is
most likely best managed through symptom relief of hot flashes, mood swings,
sleep problems, and other symptoms rather than relying on blood or saliva
levels.
Could natural progesterone have a protective effect on breast cancer but
potentially cause other health issues such as an increased risk for heart rhythm
disturbances?
My opinion as of February 2009
The bottom line is that every woman has to decide for herself whether
the benefits of hormone use, in terms of menopause symptom relief and
potential reduction of osteoporosis or treating other medical issues,
outweighs the potential risks for cancer, heart attack, stroke, or other
serious conditions from HRT use. Does the use of hormone replacement
increase or decrease mortality? The answers are not yet in.
Keep in mind that there is a physiological reason why hormone
levels drop with age. The human body was not meant to be exposed to high
levels of certain hormones with aging. Therefore, any form of hormone
replacement through pills, creams, or shots, and whether synthetic or
bioidentical, is not something the human body is genetically adapted
to. Humans have lived on this planet for a long, long time but it has
been only in the last few decades that doctors started prescribing
hormone replacement therapy to such a large number of women. If, a decade
or two from now, research shows bioidentical hormone use to
be safe, I will wholeheartedly promote their use. Until then, women who are using
these hormones, particularly in high dosages and for prolonged periods,
are taking a gamble. If natural hormone replacement is the only solution
to reducing your menopausal symptoms or taking care of other health
issues you have, use the least dosage that works and for the shortest
period of time. Exercise, weight training, calcium and vitamin D are a
few good options in reducing the risk for osteoporosis. The risk for
heart disease, stroke, and mental decline can be reduced through diet,
exercise, low stress, yoga, deep sleep, and by taking certain natural
herbs and supplements. See
http://www.raysahelian.com/menopause.html and
http://www.raysahelian.com/diet.html
I want to emphasize that I am not in favor, nor am I against, the use
of hormone replacement therapy. I just want women to be aware of all the
benefits and risks and make an informed decision. The quality of life of
many women has improved through HRT, whether synthetic or bioidentical,
while other women have discovered the use of hormones has caused more
problems than benefits. I support a woman's decision, no matter what, as
long as she is informed and knows all the options, benefits and risks. I
came across an interesting article that you may appreciate:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123362356236541855.html
Q. Many herbalists I know suggest that supplements
should be taken a half-hour before meals or 1-2 hours after meals on an empty
stomach. In contrast, supplement bottles often state on the label to take with
meals. When should supplements be taken, with or without meals?
A. It depends. As a general rule, if you are taking a supplement in
order to experience a quick mental, sexual, or physical effect from it, it is best to take it
on an empty stomach so that it is absorbed quickly and without interference from
food. For instance, Mind Power Rx can provide quicker and more noticeable mental
enhancement when taken on an empty stomach, but it is also possible that the
side effects would be more pronounced, such as restlessness, if the contents of
the capsule are absorbed too quickly. When taken with a meal, the effects become
more subtle and steadier. Another option is to take it a few minutes before a
meal to get both a quick and slow absorption. Older people may wish to take them
with a meal to cushion the effects. Passion Rx would fall in the same category
as Mind Power Rx. As far as taking supplements for long term health, where an
immediate reaction is not needed, for instance antioxidant pills or
multivitamins, one can take
them with a meal, usually breakfast. These are just guidelines and each person would need to try
their supplements with a meal or on an empty stomach to determine which method
works best for them.
===================================
SUPPLEMENT RESEARCH UPDATE - by Ray Sahelian, M.D.
Vol. 6, Issue 1 -- January, 2009
===================================
Doctors gave wrong advice
for several decades by routinely recommending women after menopause take
estrogen and progesterone pills. It now seems quite clear that taking
estrogen and progesterone after menopause increases the risk for breast
cancer. In fact, a new study finds the use of menopause hormones for
five years doubles the risk for breast cancer. Even women who took
estrogen and progestin pills for as little as two years had a greater
chance of getting cancer. And when women stopped taking the hormones,
their risk was reduced, returning to a normal risk level about two years
after quitting the hormones. The study results are from the Women's Health Initiative which
tested estrogen and progestin pills that doctors long believed would
prevent heart disease, bone loss and many other problems in women after
menopause. The actual estrogen and progestin combination in the study
was Wyeth Pharmaceuticals' Prempro. The main part of the study was stopped in 2002 when
researchers saw surprisingly higher risks of heart problems and breast
cancer in hormone users.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28222004/
Although the benefit of natural herbs for menopausal
symptom relief continues to be debated, at least there is no current
evidence these herbs and supplements cause an increased risk of breast
cancer. If you are a woman who has postmenopausal symptoms, and herbal
therapies have not worked well, and hormone therapy is the only option,
take the lowest dosage possible, use natural forms of these hormones,
and take them for as little time as possible. Are bio-identical hormones
safer? I will discuss this in the next issue. See
http://www.raysahelian.com/menopause.html
PRODUCT DISCOUNTS at Physician Formulas -- For the next few days all subscribers are eligible to a FREE bottle of DMAE. DMAE is a methyl donor used for mind enhancement and mental clarity. The following products are on sale. Diet Rx is a popular herbal appetite suppressant. Most users notice appetite suppression within 2 or 3 days of use and report being full while eating less food. Astaxanthin is a natural and potent carotenoid antioxidant. Fenugreek supplement helps support sugar metabolism and may help maintain a healthy blood sugar level. Indole 3 Carbinol is an extract from cabbage, cauliflower, and Brussels sprouts. Indole-3-carbinol is converted in the gut to diindolylmethane (DIM) which has anti-tumor activity. Nattokinase is a blood thinning and blood clot dissolving enzyme. Discuss with your doctor before using this supplement especially if you take aspirin or other pills that thin the blood.
1. Why not use natural brain boosters instead of
prescription brain boosting drugs?
According to recent trends, some people are increasingly turning to brain-enhancing drugs like
Ritalin to enhance their performance in school or at work. Surveys on college campuses
have found that drugs like Novartis' Ritalin, or methylphenidate, and Cephalon's
Provigil, or modafinil, for narcolepsy are being used by students,
professors and others as a way to get a competitive edge.
Most people are not aware that there are quite a number of natural
pills that improve concentration, focus and alertness and these are much
safer than the prescription drugs. Some of the well known natural mind
boosters include acetyl l-carnitine, DMAE, ginkgo biloba,
trimethylglycine, dimethylglycine, cdp-choline, and bacopa monnieri. A
free DMAE bottle is being offered, use half a capsule at first
with breakfast. High dosages of DMAE can cause tenseness. A good
combination I have formulated is Mind Power Rx which includes most of
these supplements, including bacopa (see below). My book, Mind Boosters,
has a full review of these, and other, mind enhancing supplements. See
http://www.raysahelian.com/memory.html
2.
Bacopa monnieri
herb for better memory
Researchers at the Brain Sciences Institute, Swinburne University, in
Australia gave healthy participants a bacopa extract for 90 days and compared
the results to a group of individuals who got placebo pills. The bacopa monnieri
product significantly improved memory accuracy. See
http://www.raysahelian.com/bacopa.html
There are many herbs and nutrients that are potentially beneficial
for memory and mental enhancement including acetyl l-carnitine, DMAE, certain B
vitamins, fish oils and others. It is difficult to predict in any one individual
which nutrient, herb, or combination will provide benefits.
3. Another reason to be cautious using statin drugs for
high cholesterol
Even at normal doses, statin drugs may cause rare
instances of eye muscle disorders. Drs. F. W. Fraunfelder and Amanda B. Richards, from the Casey
Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland,
evaluated
reports from several sources. A
total of 256 case reports of diplopia, ptosis, or ophthalmoplegia
associated with statins were identified in databases. The average
time to occurrence of the adverse drug reaction was 8 months. Among the
256 case reports, 62 patients stopped the statin drug and the diplopia
or ptosis was resolved. Sixteen case reports indicate that the statin was
started again and the diplopia or ptosis reoccurred. The problem is
probably due to a
localized myositis in the extraocular muscles just as statins can cause
myositis in other skeletal muscles in the body.
Lab experiments indicate that statin drugs reduce the
ability of progenitor muscle cells to multiply and then repair and regenerate
damaged muscles.
Emails
Q.
I came across an article from the
Los Angeles Times by Karen Kaplan (Dec. 21, 2008 front page) "Vitamin pills
aren't a cure at all and can hurt..." I just want to know what you
think about this. I am sure many Americans must have read this
article too and must be feeling insecure about taking vitamin
supplements now.
A. I have not
read this article. There are many opinions on the benefits and risks of
supplements. Just as it would be meaningless to say all prescription medications
are bad or all medications are good, it is meaningless to say all vitamins are
bad or all vitamins are good. If a person finds taking supplements, makes them feel
better, gives them more energy, makes them more productive, or improves
their health or treats a particular medical condition, then it's a
good thing. I am not yet convinced that taking very high dosages of
supplements improves longevity.
Q. I was reading some of your prior newsletters
and you mention that you occasionally
drink diet soda. Isn't diet soda pure poison?
A. I drink a can of diet or regular soda a few times a year
whenever I have an urge for one. I do not claim to be, nor wish to be, a
perfectionist. My philosophy is to live life as an A, not an A plus. It
is too stressful, counterproductive, and too rigid to try to be perfect
at all things all the time. There is no harm in drinking a can of soda a
few times a year.
Q. I enjoy your newsletter. I notice that you are
conservative when it comes to alpha lipoic acid. Juvenon website
recommends 400 mg alpha lipoic acid a day along with 1,000 mg of
acetyl l-carnitine for stimulating the mitochondria and help with
longevity. Dr. Andrew Weil also touts
the Juvenon formula. Do you have any evidence to base your position that
these high dosages will not necessarily lead to a longer life or
improved health?
A. When a doctor, scientist or a supplement marketer promotes or
recommends high dosages of a supplement or a combination of supplements
with the promises of improved health and longevity, it is their
responsibility to provide such evidence of health improvement rather
than the responsibility of another doctor or researcher to provide
contrary evidence or to defend a more cautious position. As of January 2009, I
have not come across any human studies that taking Juvenon or high dosages of
a combination acetyl l carnitine or alpha lipoic acid prolongs lifespan. In fact, in
my experience, high dosages of alpha lipoic acid and acetyl l carnitine
can disrupt sleep and ALA may even cause heart rhythm disturbances. If
evidence is provided to me that taking several hundred milligrams of a
combination of ALA and aceytl l carnitine for months or years provides
health benefits, then I will reconsider my current viewpoint. These
supplements may be used temporarily in higher dosages as a treatment for
certain conditions, see below. See
http://www.raysahelian.com/lipoic.html
Q. I started taking Advance Physician Formulas Acetyl l-Carnitine 300 mg
and R Alpha lipoic acid 50 mg (one capsule each daily, taken in the
morning) several weeks ago for fibromyalgia. I found that the
effectiveness of one capsule of each per day does not last throughout the day (I
work in the evenings). I began taking another of each in the late afternoon,
maintaining the effectiveness of the pain reduction throughout the day, into the
evening. My question is, what are the long term effects to the body of taking
that much of the supplements?
A. The long term effects of taking acetyl l carnitine alone, alpha
lipoic acid alone, or the combination has not been studied. Most trials
regarding these supplements have lasted at the most a few months.
Possible side effects with high doses of these supplements include
insomnia, excessive energy and increased heart rate, possibly leading to
heart rhythm disturbances. The benefits of supplements and medications
have to be balanced with their potential side effects. Ideally
medications and supplements are taken in the lowest dosage that work
and for the shortest period of time. Also taking breaks, for instance
one
day a week and a few days a month, can significantly minimize potential
long term side effects. Perhaps other supplements or medications can be
substituted during the breaks if the fibromyalgia symptoms are severe.
See
http://www.raysahelian.com/fibromyalgia.html
Q. In your November 2008 newsletter there was a question about magnesium stearate. Recently, by chance, I have been
trying to gather information about this additive since it seems to be in almost
all capsule form supplements. This is what I have gleaned. Most of the
time magnesium stearate is made by subjecting cottonseed or palm oil to high
heat and pressure in the presence of a metal (in this case magnesium) catalyst
for several hours. This creates a hydrogenated saturated fat. I did the math and
it follows that if each 1000mg capsule has approximately 2% magnesium stearate in
it (this seems to be about average) that means 20 mg of the capsule is
hydrogenated fat. If I take ten capsules a day I would be ingesting about
70,000mg of hydrogenated fat per year or about 2 ounces. Like most people who pay
attention to their health and do take supplements, I take a lot more than ten
capsules a day. As a person who reads labels at the grocery store and promptly
rejects any foodstuff with hydrogenated oil in it, why would I take a supplement
with hydrogenated oil in it? I believe you when you say that you haven't seen
any studies that indicate that magnesium stearate has any negative side effects.
Common sense seems to suggest that if hydrogenated oil
is no good for you when it’s in the food you eat, then its probably not good for
you when its in your supplements. I have read, in my limited research, it is not
necessary to use magnesium stearate to make supplement capsules;
it’s just easier and cheaper. Its only purpose is to keep the production
machinery running smoothly. To me, the choice between smooth running machinery
and my health is really a no brainer. Also, I've read that the presence of
magnesium stearate significantly impedes absorption of the nutrient. I really
don't know if this information is accurate its just what I've read as I surfed
many sites on the internet. What do you think?
A. The amount of stearate consumption is even less since the
magnesium part of magnesium stearate is part of the weight. Therefore, even if
there is 20 mg or so of magnesium stearate in a 1,000 mg supplement capsule,
some of that weight is magnesium, a healthy mineral. Some people can get quite
obsessed about minutia that, practically speaking, have little or no influence
on their health. One could get worried about these tiny amounts of hydrogenated
magnesium stearate that is not likely to have any health effects yet have no
concerns about getting in the car to drive to the local movie theatre. The risk
of a car accident with bodily harm or inhaling pollutants while on the road are
much more likely to occur than the minute amounts of magnesium stearate causing
harm to health. If a person is that worried about every possible harm that could
occur to them, then they would stay home and not even go out of the house. Then
again that has its own risks since once could become vitamin D deficient due to
lack of sunlight and possibly get depressed due to lack of human interaction. I
have not seen any evidence that magnesium stearate impedes absorption of
vitamins and herbs.
The amount of hydrogenated oils you mention as a result of
ingesting 10 capsules a day about the same or less than eating one donut over a
period of one year. If your diet is so perfect (with absolutely no sugar, bad
fats, cookies, cakes, ice cream, etc) that eating the equivalent of one donut
over a period of year would concern you, then you may look to find supplements
that do not contain magnesium stearate. I think there are more important health
issues to worry about than the insignificant amounts of magnesium stearate in
capsules.
One other point to keep in mind is that some websites or nutrition
writers who make a big deal about magnesium stearate may be doing so as a
marketing tool in order to differentiate their products from others and to use
this as a selling point. See
http://www.raysahelian.com/magnesiumstearate.html