Stevia sweetener supplement, liquid, powder, packets, benefit, dosage, safety and side effects by Ray Sahelian, M.D., author of The Stevia Cookbook which contains sugar free recipes

Benefits of stevia products - What if there were a natural sweetener that:

Brief History and review of safety
Stevia rebaudiana has been used as a sweetening ingredient in foods and drinks by South American natives for many centuries, and there is no report of any plant toxicity to the consumers. Stevia has been added to a number of food products in Japan since the mid 1970s. No indications of any significant side effects have yet been reported after more than 20 years of use. Similarly, no reports of any adverse reactions have been reported in the United States. Donna (co-author of The Stevia Cookbook) and her family have been using stevia since 1990 without any health problems. I have used stevia daily in my morning tea, and to sweeten cocoa powder, since 1997 without any health problems. There are no indications at this point from any source that stevia has shown toxicity in humans.

 

buy Stevia Liquid Extract 2 ounce bottle
Dr. Sahelian says:
I use this liquid every day in my morning tea and have been doing so for the past decade without any health problems.

Stevia extract pure liquid
Dietary Supplement

NuNaturals uses a stevia extract which has been laboratory tested and certified to contain a minimum 90% of the steviosides, the active ingredient of Stevia while retaining the other beneficial components. Because of this, you can be assured that you are indeed buying a true stevia extract and that it will be consistent in quality. This is a highly concentrated extract and should not be confused with less potent tinctures or extracts.

Supplement Facts
Amount Per Milliliter
Stevia extract 140 mg
     Stevia rebaudiana (20:1)
 

Click here to buy Stevia Liquid. You will also find powder, packets, chewing gum, and other products
Sign up to a FREE Supplement Research Update newsletter. Twice a month you will receive an email with a review of several studies on various supplements and natural medicine topics, including new scientific studies.

 

Role in weight gain or loss
Researchers at the Institute on Aging at the University of Florida evaluated the effect of preloads containing stevia, aspartame or sucrose on food intake, satiety and postprandial glucose and insulin levels. The study included 19 healthy lean and 12 obese individuals between the ages of 18-50 who completed three separate food test days during which they received either low-calorie pre-loads of stevia (290kcal) or asparatame (290kcal) or sucrose (493kcal) before lunch and dinner. Those consuming stevia or aspartame did not try to compensate for the lower caloric intake by eating more food. There were no differences reported in satiety and hunger levels. Participants experienced lower blood glucose and insulin levels when consuming stevia. The researchers wrote “The key finding was that participants did not compensate by eating more at either their lunch or dinner meal when they consumed lower calorie preloads containing stevia or aspartame compared to when they consumed higher calorie preloads containing sucrose.” Anton SD, Martin CK, Han H, et al. Effects of stevia, aspartame, and sucrose on food intake, satiety, and postprandial glucose and insulin levels. Appetite, 2010.

 

Interview for an article in 2009
I am a reporter for a health magazine and have a few questions: Stevia has been given the long-awaited GRAS (Generally Recognized as Safe) green light by the FDA, and recently Reb A, a zero-calorie sweetener derived from the stevia leaf has been OK'd for more widespread use in food and drink products--but some critics don't feel that it's been tested enough to be included in the far-reaching soft drink industry. Are their safety concerns legitimate?
   Stevia has been used in Japan and other countries for several decades. It has been available in the US since the mid 1990s and there have not been any reported adverse effects with its use. Frankly, I am surprised that the FDA did not allow stevia to be called a sweetener until the big companies petitioned it. In fact, for many years, until 2008, the FDA continued saying that they felt it was not safe. Suddenly they changed their mind. I am not aware of any long term new stevia safety studies that were published recently that would have led the FDA to change their mind. The whole thing is suspicious and makes the FDA appear not be playing fair. When the health food industry wanted the restriction on stevia being called a sweetener lifted, the FDA was against it. But when the big companies asked, it suddenly became safe.

For someone looking to replace sugar with stevia as their main dietary sweetener, what amount is recommended for daily use? And would you recommend using it instead of sugar as much as possible? Are there any warnings/dangers to beware of when using it in this way?
   I have been using this natural sweetener daily since the mid 1990s with a few drops of stevia liquid in my tea 2 or 3 times a day without any health problems. I know many people who have been using it daily for over a decade without any health problems. I am not concerned with stevia causing any medical conditions, in fact, from all the studies that I have reviewed, it is a very safe supplement and most likely much, much safer than many artificial sweeteners. 

What do you feel is the most stellar health benefit that stevia can offer?
    Since the amount of this natural sweetener needed to sweeten drinks or foods is minimal, I don't think the small amount used will have much of an effect on the body, one way or the other.

Is there anything else you'd like to share with Better Nutrition readers about stevia?
    I find stevia liquid, in its clear form, to be the most useful in teas and coffee. I like to sweeten my green tea with 3 drops of the liquid.

 

Stevia is a natural sweetener with the following benefit:
Stevia is 300 times sweeter than regular sugar, with minimal aftertaste. Stevia extract has no calories and is suitable for diabetics and those with high blood pressure. Children can use stevia without health concerns and it does not cause tooth cavities. The herbal sweetener is heat stable and thus could be used for cooking and baking. Stevia extract is a great alternative to synthetic sweeteners. It can be easily blended with other sweeteners, such as honey. Stevia is already widely and safely consumed in many countries around the world for decades.

   This remarkable, no-calorie sweetener is, unfortunately, not a household name but is on its way to becoming very popular since Coke and Pepsi will be using extracts in their drinks.  I believe that eventually stevia will be one of the most popular and widely used no-calorie sweeteners in the world. With the availability of stevia extract there seems to be little reason to use artificial sweeteners such as aspartame and saccharin.

 

December, 2008 - Stevia approved as sweetener by FDA
The Food and Drug Administration has declared the herb stevia safe for use in foods and beverages, which Coca-Cola Co., PepsiCo Inc. and other companies to market it in a variety of products. Coke introduced a reduced-calorie version of Sprite, called Sprite Green, and some Odwalla juice drinks with stevia extract. Pepsi has SoBe Lifewater, and an orange-juice drink called Trop50, containing half the calories and sugar of orange juice.
   The approval by the FDA for stevia to be used as a sweetener is puzzling since for years it had declared that stevia may not be safe. After Coke and Pepsi ask for approval, the FDA suddenly changes it's mind and now believes that stevia is safe to be consumed by the masses. I have seen no new research that would have led to a change of mind by the FDA. I have always ascertained that stevia was safe to use by the public and had been puzzled that the FDA had come out against it in the past.


Stevita, Simply Stevia extract 100 packets
Supplement Facts:
Serving Size 1 Packet - Stevia extract 96 percent steviosides.
Servings Per Container:100


Suggested Use: 1 packet with tea, coffee, beverage or as desired in cooking or baking.
 

The Stevita Simply packets are smaller than regular packets for sugar or artificial sweeteners. You can take them along on trips or while at a restaurant to use instead in your tea or coffee.


The Stevia Cookbook information


The Stevia Cookbook by Ray Sahelian, M.D. and Donna Gates explains the history of stevia, dealings with the FDA, safety of stevia extract, use by children, diabetics, for weight loss, and includes numerous recipes. The Stevia Cookbook has had positive reviews in a number of magazines, including Foreword, Booklist, and Library Journal. "The authors bring a wealth of credentials to this well-prepared compendium.... The Stevia Cookook offers sweet and healthy alternatives," says Foreword. "Recipes are easy to follow," adds Booklist. "The Stevia Cookbook contains all you need to know about the safety of various sweeteners and the political and economic controversy surrounding stevia. Best of all is the authors' knowledgeable writing, sweetened with hefty dose of humor," says Taste For Life.
 

 

Table of Contents
Part I, History of Stevia and safety research

1. Donna's Story -- Dealings with the FDA
    The Envelope with the White Powder
    The No-Calorie Miracle
    FDA Ruling Sours Sweet Stevia Story
    Sweet Revenge--The Dietary Supplement Law of 1994
    Stevia Citizenship Reinstated: Will Sugar Industry Now Hobble on Cane?

2. The Super Sweetener
    Characteristics of Stevia
    God's Gift to the Guarani
    Cultivation and Growing Pains
    The Sweet Stevia Rediscovery
    Sayonara Saccharin
    Stevia Goes Global
    Sweetening the Palm?
    Pass Me That Legal White Powder
    Déjà vu in 1998—the FDA and Fahrenheit 451?

3. How Safe Are Sweeteners?
    Artificial Sweeteners
    Saccharin
    Aspartame
    Acesulfame K
    Neotame
    Stevia Safety
    Our Daily Stevia Dose
    Animal Studies
    Latest Safety Studies with stevia and stevia extract
 
4. The Many Faces of Stevia
    Fresh Stevia Leaves
    Dried Leaves
    Green Powder
    White Extract
    Stevia Liquid Concentrates

5. Staying Healthy the Stevia Way
    Stevia and Diabetes
    Stevia and Weight Loss
    Stevia and Tooth Decay
    Stevia and High Blood Pressure--stevia helps lower blood pressure
    Pregnancy
   
6. Cooking with Stevia and recipes
    Advantages
    Stevia is Not Perfect
    Practical Tips and Suggestions
    Baking with Stevia extract
    Stevia Conversion Rate
    Time to Get Started

Part II Stevia Recipes
7. Stevia Sunrise Breakfasts recipe
8. Stevia Salads and Dressings recipe
9. Satisfying Stevia Entrees and Side Dishes
10. Sauces, Frostings, and Other Toppings
11. Heavenly Cakes and Pies
12. Homestyle Cookies, Candy, and Ice Cream
13. Luscious Custards, Puddings, and Fruit Treats - sensational stevia dessert
14. Sweet Drinks Are Made of These

 

High Quality products formulated by a medical doctor
Consider these highly popular all natural products: Mind Power Rx for better mental focus, concentration, and mood; Diet Rx which helps you eat less. It really does curb appetite; Eyesight Rx for better vision, often within days; Joint Power Rx for healthy joints; Prostate Power Rx for a healthy prostate gland; and Passion Rx for sexual enhancement, better libido, and improved performance and stamina in men and women.

 

 

 

 

Excerpt from the book The Stevia Cookbook by Ray Sahelian, M.D. and Donna Gates

 

FIVE DROPS IN A GLASS OF WATER

 "What would you like to drink?" asked the waiter. I flipped the menu to examine the choices listed on the back. The options were herbal teas, vegetable juices, and fruit juices. I was about to open my mouth and ask what kind of herbal tea they had when I was interrupted.

 

"Bring him a glass of water with lemon on the side," said Donna, who was sitting across from me.
   I was a little taken back by her assertiveness. We happened to be at a natural food restaurant, called Inaka, located in Los Angeles. I had been introduced to Donna through a friend, who has known her for many years. This was my very first time meeting her. Donna is a nutritionist who normally lives in Atlanta, Georgia, but was in Los Angeles to visit her daughter.

 

"I want you to try a natural sweetener called stevia," added Donna.
   I had heard about stevia (pronounced with a long "e," steeevia) a year earlier. It was touted as a natural alternative to the synthetic sweeteners currently marketed, and also as an alternative to table sugar. I hadn't paid much attention to these claims because I couldn't imagine a natural sweetener to be as powerful as a synthetic one like saccharin. At most, it perhaps had similar sweetening potential as did honey, but I couldn't imagine it being more potent. The waiter brought the glass of water and placed it on the table. Next to it he put a small plate with two pieces of cut lemon.

 

"Now squeeze the lemon in the water," advised Donna.

   I followed her instructions and squeezed the lemon, first making sure I removed the seeds with a fork.

"Now add five drops of this stevia liquid extract," she added, as she handed me a small bottle the size of an eye dropper bottle you would wet your eyes with.
   Before I added the drops, I took a sip from the glass. It now definitely had a lemon flavor. I added five drops and saw them make their way to the bottom of the glass, partially dissolving along the way. I took a sip.

 

"How is it?" asked Donna.

"I was expecting it to be sweeter," I replied. Frankly, I was disappointed. Just as I expected, it couldn't be that sweet. Being familiar with the synthetic sweeteners, I knew a natural substance couldn't compete. The claims about Stevia were obviously hyped.

"Did you stir it?"

I hadn't. I took the glass and swirled the water around a few times. Now it appeared that the Stevia had migrated to all parts of the glass. I took another sip.      

 

"Wow! I can't believe it. It tastes as sweet as if I had put a couple of teaspoons of sugar in the glass," I said excited. "This may just be my imagination, Donna, but the lemon flavor seems more enhanced."

"It does bring out some flavors," she informed.

"Where do you buy this stuff?"

"It's available in most health food stores. With time I think it will become available in many other retail stores. I carry a small bottle of it with me when I go to restaurants."

"Does it have many calories?"

"Minimal or none. In my opinion, Stevia is the ideal no-calorie sweetener. It's too bad much of the American public doesn't know about it. It originated from South America and they've been using it in Japan in soy products, soft drinks, and other foods since the 1970s."

"Why isn't it more broadly available in the States?'

"The FDA banned the import of stevia products to the United States in 1991."

"Why, is there something wrong with stevia?"

"I think it's very safe."

"How is it that it's available now?"

"They allowed it to come back on the market in 1995."

"It doesn't make sense."

"I've read the studies on stevia, and tests have shown this herb to be very safe. The Japanese have been using it for 20 years. Currently the FDA allows it to be sold as a dietary supplement but doesn't allow anyone selling the product to make the claim that stevia is a sweetener."

"It's allowed as a dietary supplement, but not as a sweetener?"

"That's right."

"I don't get it... But, anyway, have you personally used stevia for a long time?

"For many years now. I love it, so does my family. Over the years we've created many delicious recipes with Stevia."

 

            By now I had finished my glass and asked for a refill. The second piece of lemon was squeezed into the glass and this time I added four drops. It was still sweet, and delicious. As good as sugared lemonade. The second glass was soon gone and the waiter filled it again and brought another dish of cut lemon pieces. This time I added three drops and it still was adequate. I don't remember how many glasses of stevia-sweetened lemon water I drank that evening.

            Towards the end of a very enjoyable dinner with great conversation, I became more and more convinced that there was something special about stevia. I wanted to find out everything I could about this natural sweetener. I got very motivated to do a thorough evaluation of the scientific studies published on it and determine how it worked, what was in it, and what influence it had on the body. I also wanted to find out more about the FDA's concerns or motivation in banning the import of stevia in 1991. And the most important question had to be determined: Was stevia safe for long-term human consumption?

            I took my last sip from the glass.

 

"I can't believe a natural sweetener that works so well is so little known, and used, in this country. Sooner or later, Stevia is going to be big news," I pondered aloud.

"I agree with you," replied Donna. "Eventually everyone will know about it."

"There's a possibility that this could replace artificial sweeteners, or, at least, be extremely widely used. After all, almost everybody daily adds either artificial sweeteners to their drinks, ingests them in certain liquids and foods, or consumes refined sugars."

"I agree with you."

"The makers of artificial sweeteners are not going to like the fact that stevia can be used as an alternative to their patented products." I remarked.

"They could soon be shedding some sweet tears."

There was a pause for a few seconds. My mind was on overdrive--racing with several ideas.

 

"And diabetics could take advantage of it," I proposed.

"That's right."

"Perhaps even children could use it instead of those high-calorie sugared drinks, or instead of the possibly harmful synthetic sweeteners."

"Most likely."

"What about people who want to lose weight but currently use regular table sugar, or don't like the taste of artificial sweeteners, or are concerned about some of the potential risks with their use. Could they substitute stevia?"

"Why not?"

"Does it cause tooth cavities?"

"At least one study has shown it not to. Stevia could be used in candy, chewing gum, mouthwash, and even in toothpaste."

 

I looked at her in the eyes. She had a gentle gaze with a serene smile. I had little doubt that she genuinely believed in the potential benefits of stevia as an excellent alternative to currently available sweeteners.

 

"Donna, I have a proposal for you." I said.

"What's that?"

"How would you like to spread the stevia story with me?"

 

CHAPTER One The Stevia Cookbook - DONNA'S STORY

Many years ago I became interested in developing and promoting a more natural lifestyle incorporating whole foods along with sensitivity to our environment. However, early on, it became clear that I was missing one of the key ingredients of this diet: a healthy sugar substitute. I was uncomfortable with many of the artificial sweeteners (aspartame, saccharin) and thus began my search for a natural alternative.

   I first heard about stevia in 1990 from a multilevel marketing firm that was promoting it as a component of a facemask. A green-colored stevia syrup (derived from stevia leaves) was packaged with a small bottle of clay. The instructions recommended that the clay be blended with the stevia syrup and applied to the face. But it was the syrup's potential as a sweetener that interested me. I tried it. It was intensely sweet with a strong licorice-like aftertaste. Later I learned that I had taken far too much, a common mistake made by first-time users. Fortunately, a much more flavorful version of stevia came my way.

 

The Envelope with the White Powder

I now live in Atlanta, Georgia, and work as a nutritional consultant. During the time I was living in Washington, D.C., I knew some friends who worked at the Chinese Embassy. One night I had dinner with two of them and mentioned my frustration in finding an adequate sugar substitute. Several weeks later, to my surprise, my friends presented me with an envelope containing a white powder that they had requested from a Chinese University. I was now holding a sample of stevioside crystals (one of the main sweet ingredients from the stevia plant). These crystals were extracted from Chinese-grown stevia plants using award-winning Japanese technology. In a joint venture with the Chinese, the Japanese had developed a special technology to extract stevia's super-sweet crystals from the plant, leaving behind the licorice-tasting residue and creating a concentrated powder that, by weight, is 300 times sweeter than sugar.

 

The No-Calorie Miracle!

I was thrilled! Here was a widely used, totally natural sweetener that had virtually no calories. I immediately began experimenting with it--baking with it, adding it to beverages and making Stevia-flavored desserts. Many clients that I counsel as a nutritionist began to use it in place of sugar. They could now enjoy a sweet taste and avoid the harmful consequences of excessive sugar intake. Soon thereafter, I arranged for delivery of a large amount of stevia, both for my personal use and to make available to clients.

 

FDA Ruling Sours Sweet Stevia Story

In 1991, a curious thing happened. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) labeled stevia an "Unsafe food additive" and issued an alert blocking the importation of stevia into the United States. This seemed to be a really peculiar development. After all, not that many people knew about stevia and it was sold almost solely in health food stores. As the months rolled by, I noticed that the health food stores, knowing of the ban, continued to sell stevia quite openly. It moved quickly off the shelves as loyal customers bought the last available supplies. Then it was gone.

   During this time, I did an enormous amount of research. First, I used a Freedom of Information Act request to ensure that I had all the information on stevia then in the hands of the FDA. No indication of any ill effects in humans appeared anywhere in any of the literature, nor in other reports that I found independently. Plus, I was using it regularly, as were many people I knew. No one had noticed any adverse effects. Everyone loved it.

   It was at about this time that I moved to Atlanta and decided to take a stand. The FDA had, by then, succeeded in stonewalling the marketing of stevia by refusing to consider petitions that sought to have it officially placed on the "generally recognized as safe," or "GRAS" list. I found this peculiar since animal studies had indicated saccharin to be cancer causing, yet it was being widely sold. In fact, the SWEET-N-LOW package clearly mentions this concern. Why was saccharin available, yet Stevia, a natural sweetener used for centuries in South America, wasn't?

   The ban on stevia put supporters in a classic "Catch-22" position. In order to prove that stevia was safe for human consumption, millions of dollars (and years of effort) would be required to move this herb through the FDA approval process as an accepted food additive. However, whoever invested all this money would not be able to recoup the full benefits since they could not patent this product. A number of manufacturers could start importing it and marketing it. That's because, unlike aspartame, stevia is an herb and not a synthetic creation by a pharmaceutical company. Economists call this a "free rider." One person or company pays the costs of obtaining the approval and then everyone else rides along for free.

 

Sweet Revenge--The Dietary Supplement Law of 1994

During 1993, the FDA miscalculated. It attempted to take control of dietary supplements and herbal products and limit their availability to the public. To everyone's surprise, a massive grassroots movement started objecting to this intrusion into each person's right to self-medicate with dietary supplements. Various natural food industry groups organized to respond to this threat. A few senators and members of Congress rallied behind them. Orrin Hatch, the Senator from Utah, was instrumental in solidifying the movement's opposition. Ads were taken on television. I remember seeing a television ad of Mel Gibson in his kitchen opening a vitamin C bottle and about to pop one in his mouth when FDA agents burst into his house and handcuffed him, dragging him out of his house for prosecution. Of course, this was quite an exaggeration, but it made the point. The public rallied, afraid to have their multivitamin bottle snatched away from them.

   Based on the continued pressure from the public, the natural foods industry, and from the American Herbal Products Association, Congress passed the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act in fall of 1994. This law eased restrictions on a number of dietary supplements for sale to the public. The FDA could no longer classify supplements as food additives, hence they did not be subjected to intensive safety testing before their introduction to the American consumer. You may recall that the hormones melatonin and DHEA became available to the public as a consequence of this law. And, as a result of a vitamin company notifying the FDA of its intention to market stevia, The FDA lifted its ban on stevia in 1995.

 

Stevia Citizenship Reinstated: Will Sugar Industry Now Hobble on Cane?

So stevia began to flow back into the United States. Not, mind you, as a sweetener, but only when labeled as dietary supplement. Its natural sweetening qualities, the FDA warned, would still be considered a "technical effect," and thus should not be mentioned. While the natural foods industry was encouraged by the lifting of the import ban, few had wanted to attract the attention of the FDA by including stevia in their products and advertising it for what it is--a sweetener. Because stevia remains in legal limbo, food manufacturers are nervous to use it in products.

   I've always wondered whether the FDA was pressured from any giant sugar or artificial industry to ban the import of stevia. After all, if stevia can be imported and sold by anyone, it could be a major economic threat to various companies.

   I know all this must sound difficult to believe. Yet it's true. As this book goes to press, a natural, practically no-calorie, safe-for-diabetics, non-pharmaceutical sweetener already widely used in other countries, including Japan (whose Ministry of Health is notoriously more strict than the FDA), cannot be openly sold as a sweetener in this country.

 

What is Stevia?

Known by the official taxonomy name of Stevia rebaudiana, stevia is a plant of the daisy family that grows naturally in South America. The plant, at its full maturity, reaches a height of close to three feet. The green leaves of this plant contain large amounts (up to 5 percent of dry weight) of stevioside, a sweetener estimated to be 300 times as sweet as table sugar (Isima, 1976).

   At least 150 species of Stevia are believed to exist in North and South America. In a study done in 1982, more than 110 species of Stevia were tested for their sweetness. Stevia rebaudiana was found to be the sweetest, although 18 other species were found to also exhibit a sweet taste (Soejarto, 1982). It's quite possible that other species in the future could be found to have chemicals that are as sweet as Stevia rebaudiana.

   The researchers in the above study mention an interesting observation. They found fragments of a 62 year-old leaf that exhibited potent sweetness. This indicates that the chemicals within this herb are very stable and have the ability to withstand time and drying.

 

How Does It Taste?

Stevia, of course, is very sweet, and it only has a minimal aftertaste. A study done in 1977 indicates that the quality of sweetness of stevia is preferable to that of aspartame or saccharin (Abe, 1977).

   A study conducted in Japan in 1976 found that pure stevia extract was 300 times as sweet as sucrose (or table sugar) at 0.4 percent sucrose concentration, and 100 times sweeter when compared to a 10 percent concentration.

 

What's in stevia herb?

There are normally hundreds of chemicals present within any herbal product or extract. It's sometimes very difficult to identify every single component of an herb. Preliminary studies with stevia have shown that it contains certain chemicals that provide a sweet taste including stevioside, and rebaudioside A (Kinghorn, 1984). As mentioned earlier, stevioside makes up about five percent of the dry weight, while rebaudioside makes up two percent. Hence, rebaudioside A is found at a lower concentration than stevioside, but is apparently a more pleasant-tasting sweet substance (Crammer, 1987). Additionally, the oily part of stevia contains a number of sterols including stigmasterol (46 percent), beta-sitosterol (39 percent) and campesterol (13 percent) (D'Agostino, 1984). The compounds within stevia are very stable and can last for decades. They are resistant to heat and time.

CHEMICAL STRUCTURE OF STEVIOSIDE - A diterpenic carboxylic alcohol, with three glucose molecules C38 H60 O18 (Mosettig, 1955)

 

God's Gift to the Guarani

Certain Indian tribes in South America have used stevia for hundreds of years, possibly even before Columbus landed there (Lee, 1979). Since the natural habitat of this plant is in northeastern Paraguay near the Brazilian border, certain Indians of the region, particularly the Guarani and Matto Grosso tribes, were the first to take advantage of its sweet properties. They called it kaa he-e, a native term which translates as "sweet herb." These natives were aware that the leaves of the wild stevia shrub had a sweetening power unlike anything else. They commonly used the leaves to enhance the taste of bitter maté (a tea-like beverage). They also used it in medicinal potions, or simply chewed them for their sweet taste. The widespread native use of stevia was chronicled by the Spaniards in historical documents preserved in the Paraguayan National Archives in Asuncion, the capital of Paraguay. As the settlers moved into the region, they learned of this shrub and starting using it. By the 1800s, daily stevia consumption had become well entrenched throughout the region-- not just in Paraguay, but also in the neighboring countries of Brazil and Argentina.

   The credit for the discovery of stevia by a Westerner goes to an Italian botanist with the name of Bertoni. He first learned of what he described as, "this very strange plant" from Indian guides while exploring Paraguay's eastern forests in 1887. It was 12 years later when he was presented with tangible evidence-- a packet of stevia fragments and broken leaves received from a friend who had gotten them from maté plantations. Bertoni named this variety of stevia genus in honor of a Paraguayan chemist named Rebaudi who subsequently became the first to extract the plant's sweet constituent. (One of the chemicals responsible for stevia's sweetness is named rebaudioside, after Rebaudi). Bertoni was quite excited about his discovery, "In placing in the mouth the smallest particle of any portion of the leaf or twig," he wrote, "one is surprised at the strange and extreme sweetness contained therein. A fragment of the leaf only a few millimeters in size suffices to keep the mouth sweet for an hour; a few small leaves are sufficient to sweeten a strong cup of coffee or tea." In 1903 Bertoni discovered the live plant, which allowed him to make a full study. It wasn't until 1905, though, that he published his results and assigned this plant to the genus stevia.

 

Cultivation and Growing Pains

Bertoni's "discovery" was a turning point for stevia in one very real sense (other than being identified, analyzed and given a name). Whereas prior to 1900 it had grown only in the wild, with consumption limited to those having access to its natural habitat, it now became ripe for cultivation. In 1908, a ton of dried leaves was harvested, the very first stevia crop. Before long, stevia plantations began springing up, a development that corresponded with a marked reduction in the plant's natural growth area due to the clearing of forests by timber interests and, to an extent, the removal of thousands of stevia plants for transplantation (Soejarto, 1983). (The growing of stevia from seed is very difficult.) Consequently, its use began to increase dramatically, both in and beyond Latin America.

   As word of this unique herb began to spread, so, too, did interest in its potential as a marketable commodity. Stevia was first brought to the attention of the US government in 1918 by a botanist for the US Department of Agriculture who said he had learned about stevia while drinking maté and tasted it years later, finding it to have a "remarkable sweetness."

   Stevia was presented to the USDA in 1921 by American Trade Commissioner George Brady as a "new sugar plant with great commercial possibilities." Brady took note of its non-toxicity and its ability to be used in its natural state, with only drying and grinding required. He also conveyed the claims that it was "an ideal and safe sugar for diabetics." In a memo to the Latin American Division of the USDA, Brady further stated that he was "desirous of seeing it placed before any American companies liable to be interested, as it is very probable that it will be of great commercial importance."

 

The Sweetest Rediscovery

While nothing came of this early show of interest in the United States, an event occurred in France in 1931 that would later prove significant. Two chemists isolated the most prevalent of several compounds that gives the stevia leaf its sweet taste, a pure white crystalline extract they named stevioside (Bridel, 1931). One US government researcher, Dr. Hewitt G. Fletcher, described this extract as "The sweetest natural product yet found." Although he mistakenly added, "It is natural to ask, 'of what use is stevioside?' The answer at this point is 'none'."

   The Japanese, though, didn't take the opinion of a US government researcher too seriously.

 

Sayonara Saccharin

Consistent with a popular movement in Japan in the 1960s to move away from allowing chemicals in the food supply, the Japanese government partially restricted the use of artificial sweeteners. Originally introduced to Japan in the mid 1970s by a consortium of food-product manufacturers, stevioside and other stevia products quickly caught on. By 1988, they reportedly represented approximately 41 percent of the market share of potently sweet substances consumed in Japan (Kinghorn, 1992). In addition to widespread use as a table-top sweetener, like the packets of saccharin (Sweet'N Low) and aspartame (Equal, NutraSweet), commonly found in the United States, stevia was also used by the Japanese to sweeten a variety of food products, including ice cream, bread, candies, pickles, seafood, vegetables, and soft drinks. Stevia was even added to chewing gum.

   Japan's experience proved several other significant facts about this phenomenal plant: its adaptability and its safety. Adaptability was proven through the discovery that the plant could be grown throughout most of this temperate island nation, albeit under special hothouse conditions. A whole industry has started in Japan, Brazil, and other countries dedicated to the extraction and purification of sweeteners from the stevia plant for commercial purposes (Ishii, 1987).

 

Stevia Goes Global

The spread of stevia was not limited to Japan. Today it is also grown and used in a number of other countries outside of South America. This plant is now grown on a commercial scale in most parts of Japan, Thailand, China, and South Korea, as well as in Paraguay and Brazil (Yodyingyuad, 1991). Other countries reported to cultivate stevia include Germany, Malaysia, and Israel.

   By the mid-1980s, stevia's reputation had finally sparked the interest of various US companies, including that were becoming aware of its potential commercial value. Celestial Seasonings had begun using crushed and powdered stevia leaves to create herbal teas that were sweet yet noncaloric. No side effects were reported during this brief period of stevia use. With the addition of stevia to a number of popular brands of herbal tea (as a sweetener and flavor enhancer), the remarkable ancient sweet herb of the Guarani Indians was at last poised to make a delayed debut in the American marketplace.         

                                               

Sweet to the Tongue, Bitter to the Pocketbook

By this time, however, powerful market forces were at work. A gigantic artificial sweetener industry was noticing the potential threat by the appearance of a sweetener that was natural, virtually non-caloric and safe, and that could be cultivated and sold by anyone. No sooner had stevia been introduced to the US herbal scene and growing in market share, that the FDA, just as quickly, launched an aggressive campaign to nip it in the bud. In 1987, the FDA began notifying companies selling herbal products that they could not market stevia because it was not an approved food additive.

           

The FDA versus Forty Boxes of that South American White Powder

Yes, your federal agents are hard at work, protecting you from the dangers of white powders imported from South America. However, this particular white powder is not snorted, it's added to your breakfast tea, or your lemonade.

   Linda Bonvie and Bill Bonvie, a brother and sister writer team, published an excellent article in the January/February 1996 issue of New Age Journal (see web site www.newage.com/Journal/wf/wf11.html for full text). They investigated the possible behind-the-scenes motivation of the FDA's import ban. They start their article with the big-time "drug bust" that occurred in Texas shortly after the stevia import ban took effect.

 

       It took place on a summer day in 1991, when a bevy of armed federal marshals raided the Arlington, Texas, warehouse of businessman Oscar Rodes, served him with a warrant, and proceeded to seize his most recent shipment. "They didn't give me any advance notice or anything, Rodes recalls. "They came in my office in the warehouse, and that's when they showed me the papers" and "took everything away."

       Rodes himself was not taken into custody. The arrest warrant was for the boxes he had just imported from South America, which contained some dried leaves and a white powder extracted from them. "They just asked me to open the warehouse door, and they backed up the truck and loaded it up," he recalls. "They said they were going to burn it. I was surprised--all the marshals, ready to go and take away my teas."

 

   A search on the internet at the FDA web site (www.fda.org) reveals this alert posted on 12/19/95 to guide FDA agents in the field:

 

Subject
   Automatic detention of stevia leaves, extract of stevia leaves, and foods containing stevia, unless explicitly labeled as a dietary supplement.

 

Problem
   Unsafe food additive.

 

Reason for Alert
   Stevioside, the extract of stevia, has reportedly been approved for use in foods in Brazil and Japan. The product is used in these countries as a table top sweetener in virtually all food commodities and as a flavor enhancer in such products as teas.
   With regard to its use in foods, stevia is not an approved food additive nor affirmed as GRAS (generally recognized as safe) in the United States. Available toxicological information on stevia is inadequate to demonstrate its safety as a food additive. However, with regard to its use in dietary supplements, stevia is not subject to food additive regulations.
   Stevia leaves and stevioside have been offered for entry both in bulk and in finished products. Examples of products detained because of stevia include teas, drinks, seafood, fruits, vegetables, and candies.

 

Guidance:
   Districts may detain without physical examination all products identified on the attachment to this alert. If review of the labeling or import paperwork reveals stevia leaves, stevioside, or products containing stevioside, districts may detain these items without physical examination, unless explicitly labeled as a dietary supplement, or for use solely as a dietary ingredient in the manufacture of a dietary supplement product. For questions or issues concerning science, policy, sample collection, or analysis, contact the FDA, Division of Field Science at 301-443-3320. For the full report, see web site www.fda.gov//ora/fiars/ora_import_ia4506.html.

 

Sweetening the Palm?

Just what prompted the FDA to intervene in the marketing of stevia is difficult to fully unravel. Rumors persist that the catalyst was a "trade complaint" from a company that did not want stevia made available to consumers. As of this writing, no such complaint has yet surfaced that dates back to the launching of the FDA's campaign against stevia. However, an "anonymous" trade complaint submitted some time later is indeed on record, one that resulted in Celestial Seasonings, a Boulder, Colorado-based tea company, being forced to suspend its use of stevia in its popular line of herbal teas. Was the trade complaint filed by the NutraSweet Company, the maker of aspartame? Richard Nelson, vice president of public affairs for NutraSweet, a company, previously owned by G.D. Searle and now a Monsanto subsidiary, denies that his company had anything to do with the FDA's ban of stevia (Fresno Bee, Aug 27, 1996).

   Despite presentations to the FDA of substantial historical and scientific data of stevia safety in petitions submitted in 1992 by the American Herbal Products Association (AHPA), an association of companies that manufacture and distribute herbal products, and the Thomas J. Lipton Company, seeking GRAS (generally recognized as safe) status for stevia, the FDA refused to consider filing the petitions. (When particular herbs or natural products have been historically in use for a long time, the FDA generally allows them a GRAS status.) In fact, a review of the correspondence between the FDA and representatives from the AHPA, reveals a number of unreasonable requests made by the FDA and delays that appeared to be of a stalling nature. The web site of Guarani Botanicals, www.tiac.net/users/mgold/sweet/stv-petition.txt, has a fascinating account of the full details of this correspondence.

   Rob McCaleb, president of the Herb Research Foundation, summarizes, "Basically stevia was made illegal because it is unpatentable, and no one can profit from putting it through the FDA's red tape. The fact that this benefits large corporations like NutraSweet is probably not a coincidence. Intended to ensure consumer safety, the FDA had instead become a means for the makers of more expensive chemical products to prevent competition from less expensive natural products."
   By denying it official GRAS status, the FDA was able to place stevia in the "food additive" category, which requires that it undergo substantial scientific study prior to marketing. The fact that stevia is a sweetener complicates the matter further, since the FDA tends to view any "new" sweetener as an additive with a particularly high potential for mass consumption, necessitating special scrutiny.
   In 1994, however, passage of the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act created an opportunity for stevia to enter the US market despite the FDA's opposition. Under this legislation, various vitamins, minerals, herbs or other botanicals not considered conventional foods or the sole item in a meal or diet may be marketed in the form of capsules, tablets, liquids, powders, or soft gels provided they are labeled "dietary supplements." Such supplements can no longer be classified by the FDA as "food additives" and need not be subjected to intensive safety testing.

   The following year, in the fall of 1995, stevia did indeed gain status as a dietary supplement after a 75-day "pre-market notification" was submitted to the FDA. The agency could have challenged that, too (and still can, for that matter) by claiming that there is inadequate safety information. Had it done so, however, the FDA would have borne the burden of proof for such a claim. It chose not to pick a fight.

 

Pass Me That Legal White Powder

At long last stevia is legally available in the United States-- but only in its limited form as a dietary supplement. Any other use (such as in teas or processed foods) continues to be prohibited. Stevia "supplements" cannot be labeled as sweeteners, or in any way described as having sweetening power. This is ironic since other supplements can feature certain health claims as long as the label states, "These claims have not been evaluated by the FDA."

   The FDA does have a great burden on their shoulders. After all, they have the responsibility to make sure food products don't have the potential to harm the public. But was their ban on the import of stevia into this country, and the subsequent rigid enforcement, justified by the published scientific studies, or were there... ehem.. how should we say...  non-scientific reasons involved?

 

CHAPTER Three of The Stevia Cook Book

SWEET'N LOW EQUALS SACCHARIN:

Say, Are Synthetic Sweeteners Safe? 

Patent a synthetic sweetener, do some toxicity studies in animals that show it to be safe, send the results to the FDA, get their stamp of approval, and you're instantly a billionaire. It's that easy. Actually, even if this artificial sweetener is suspected of causing cancer in animals, and you happen to have a great lobbying team, you can still make your billions. But, if you happen to want to sell a natural product as a sweetener that's been used for centuries and has not shown to cause toxicity in animals and humans, good luck.

   There are three major artificial sweeteners sold in this country, saccharin, aspartame and acesulfame K. Let's briefly review their safety.           

   Saccharin (Sweet 'N Low) is a zero-calorie granulated sugar substitute discovered in 1879 and up to 200 to 400 times sweeter than cane sugar. One packet contains the sweetness of two teaspoons of sugar. It is often added to soft drinks, gum, toothpaste, and foods such as dietetic canned fruits and salad dressings. It comes in a highly recognized pink packet with the very reassuring warning written in tiny letters that requires a high-resolution magnifier to read:

   "USE OF THIS PRODUCT MAY BE HAZARDOUS TO YOUR HEALTH. THIS PRODUCT CONTAINS SACCHARIN WHICH HAS BEEN DETERMINED TO CAUSE CANCER IN LABORATORY ANIMALS."

   Since 1981, saccharin has been listed in the US government's "Report on Carcinogens," after a Canadian study indicated it caused bladder cancer in laboratory animals. On October 31, 1997, the National Institute of Environmental Health, a government advisory panel, recommended that products containing this sweetener should continue to carry a warning label. An industry group called Calorie Control Council, which had sought a review of the warning, was not happy with this decision. They argued that the studies done on rats were not comparable to human use.

   In January of 1998, National Cancer Institute researchers announced that eating saccharin does not cause bladder cancer in monkeys. They tested 20 monkeys for as long as 24 years, giving them 25 mg per kg of body weight of saccharin five days a week. This dose was about five times of that allowed in humans. They were compared to a group of 16 monkeys who got no saccharin. Urine testing in the last two years showed no evidence of bladder cancer.

    It is still unknown whether long-term saccharin ingestion influences human tumor formation or whether it has any other long-term health consequences. For practical purposes, the ingestion of small amounts of this artificial sweetener should not be of concern.

   Aspartame (NutraSweet, Equal) was approved by the FDA in 1981 and allowed in diet sodas in 1983. It has no warnings on the packet other than regarding its use by anyone with phenylketonuria (PKU), a rare inherited condition that afflicts one in 15,000 Americans. Uninformed consumers assume that they can use it with impunity, ingesting it directly or as a sweetener in hundreds of products. NutraSweet's parent company was the pharmaceutical giant Searle, which was later purchased by Monsanto.

   Discovered in 1965 in the course of ulcer-drug research, aspartame is comprised of phenylalanine, aspartic acid and methanol, or wood alcohol (which, when ingested, breaks down into formaldehyde). Aspartame has been the prime suspect for a variety of symptoms chronicled in thousands of consumer complaints to the FDA and the Dallas-based Aspartame Consumer Safety Network (see Resources). These include gastrointestinal symptoms, headaches, rashes, depression, seizures, memory loss, blurred vision, slurred speech, and other neurological disorders. Of course, just because a person feels a particular symptom in relation to timing of the ingestion of a particular substance doesn't automatically make this substance the culprit. It could just be coincidence.

   It's very difficult to pinpoint aspartame ingestion with symptoms of diseases since there are so many other chemicals, additives, foods, drinks, hormones, and other substances people ingest on a regular basis. However, the scientific community is starting to raise some concerns that aspartame may not be as benign as some would have us believe.

   At least two such scientists are Drs. John Olney and Nuri Farber, from the Department of Psychiatry at the Washington University Medical School in St. Louis, Missouri. In an article published in the November, 1996 issue of the Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology, they say, "In the past two decades, brain tumor rates have risen in several industrialized countries, including the United States... Compared to other environmental factors putatively linked to brain tumors, the artificial sweetener aspartame is a promising candidate to explain the recent increase in incidence and degree of malignancy of brain tumors. Evidence potentially implicating aspartame includes an early animal study revealing an exceedingly high incidence of brain tumors in aspartame-fed rats compared to no brain tumors in concurrent controls, the recent finding that the aspartame molecule has mutagenic potential, and the close temporal association (aspartame was introduced into US food and beverage markets several years prior to the sharp increase in brain tumor incidence and malignancy). We conclude that there is need for reassessing the carcinogenic potential of aspartame." (Olney, Farber, 1996)

   We called Dr. Farber in August of 1997 and he reaffirmed his position, "We have not changed our minds and still stand by our conclusions that the carcinogenic potential of aspartame needs to be reassessed."

   The FDA issued a statement regarding aspartame in November of 1996. The agency said, "A recently published medical journal article raises the question whether any increased incidence in the number of persons with brain tumors in the United States is associated with the marketing of aspartame.

   "Analysis of the National Cancer Institute's public data base on cancer incidence in the United States does not support an association between the use of aspartame and increased incidence of brain tumors.

   "The FDA stands behind its original approval decision, but the Agency remains ready to act if credible scientific evidence is presented to it."

   Aspartame, though, does have some advantages. In rat studies it has been found to not cause tooth cavities (Das, 1997), and its use as a substitute to sugar has lead to better weight control (Blackburn, 1997). However, similar benefits could potentially be obtained from stevia.

   In our opinion, the jury on aspartame is still out.

   Acesulfame K (K stands for potassium) is known by the brand names of Sweet One, Swiss Sweet, and Sunette. It is contained in a few products including non-dairy creamers, instant coffee and tea, Jell-O sugar-free puddings and gelatins, Trident Sugarless Gum, Wrigley's Freedent, Diet Coke, and Diet Pepsi. Approved by the FDA is 1988, it is 200 times sweeter than sugar. Acesulfame K is a derivative of aceoacetic acid, a synthetic chemical, and is probably not metabolized by the body.

   Neither a health warning nor an information label is required for acesulfame K. The benefits or harms of the long-term use of this artificial sweetener in humans is currently not known.

Neotame, claimed to be 8,000 times sweeter than sugar, is a synthetic sweetener developed by the Monsanto Company, maker of aspartame. In 1998, the Monsanto Company applied to the FDA to market the product as a tabletop sweetener and as a sweetening ingredient in foods and beverages. The FDA approval process is expected to last two to three years.

   If approved, neotame could replace NutraSweet (Monsanto's brand of aspartame) which has faced intense price competition in major markets because patents that once covered it have expired.

Summary

   The currently available artificial sweeteners have not been proven to be completely safe, nor have they been proven to be clearly harmful. We believe that partially, or mostly, substituting stevia for saccharin, acesulfame K, and aspartame, is a reasonable and prudent option for the consumer.

 

WHOLE LEAF, POWDER, EXTRACT, or LIQUID?

With stevia now permitted on the market as a dietary supplement, and poised to become an extremely popular product, there are quite a variety of different forms and extracts being marketed (even if none of them can officially be called a sweetener). Which stevia products you want to use will probably depend on the amount of sweetness required by the recipe and the degree to which the particular recipe or beverage will benefit from the licorice-like taste that accompanies its less refined forms.

   If you shop at a health food or grocery store, you will generally find the several forms of stevia from a number of different manufacturers. Each product may taste slightly different. Don't give up on stevia if you expect it to have the exact sweetness of sugar. It doesn't. However, when you consider the wonderful benefits it provides, you may accept its imperfections. For some people, appreciating stevia, just like wine, is an acquired taste.

 

Fresh leaves

This form of stevia is the herb in its most natural, unrefined state. It is possible to grow a stevia plant in your house or backyard (see the resources section for companies that sell stevia cuttings). Just one word of caution. If you own a cat, you may not have too many stevia leaves left on the plant. They love to chew on it.
   For many centuries the Guarani Indians in South America used the leaves of stevia to sweeten their drinks. A leaf picked from a stevia plant and chewed will impart an extremely sweet taste sensation reminiscent of licorice that lasts for quite a while. In Bertoni's first official description of the stevia plant, he noted that "A fragment of the leaf suffices to keep the mouth sweet for an hour."

 

Dried Leaves

You can find the whole dried leaf of stevia in health food stores. For more of the flavor and sweet constituents of the stevia leaf to be released, drying and crushing are necessary. A dried leaf is considerably sweeter than a fresh one, and is the form of stevia used in brewing herbal tea. When added to herbal tea blends, amounts can be adjusted to provide more or less of a sweet taste. Finely powdered or pulverized stevia leaf can be found both in bulk form and in tea bags. Several companies add stevia in tea bags with other herbs but do not mention that the stevia is for sweetening purposes since they are not allowed by the FDA to do so. These companies will instead call the stevia a dietary supplement. Most of these products are currently found in health foods stores. 
   Stevia leaves have a greenish color and can be used as flavor enhancers or sweeteners in a wide variety of foods and beverages such as vegetables, coffee, applesauce, and hot cereals. However, in this form, expect stevia to have a more noticeable licorice-type aftertaste.
   If you are interested in extracting the sweetening agents from the leaves, bring two cups of purified water to a boil. Reduce the heat to medium and add one half ounce of crushed or powdered dried stevia leaves. Cover and boil for three minutes. Remove the covered pot from the heat and steep the herb until cool. Strain the water through a cheese cloth and refrigerate it in a covered container. The resulting liquid concentrate should be greenish black in color.
   As a rule, about 10 percent of the leaves contain stevioside and rebaudioside, the actual sweet glycosides of stevia. Although stevia leaves contain various vitamins, minerals, and phytochemicals, the amounts consumed are generally so minimal that the nutritional value will be negligible.

   Generally two to four leaves are sufficient to sweeten a cup of tea or coffee. For stevia to have a more practical application as a tea or sweetener, the leaves must be dried or put through an extraction process, which makes the sweet taste even more potent.

 

Green stevia powder

When the dried leaves are ground, they turn into a fine green powder which is generally about 10 to 20 times as sweet as sugar. You can convert this powder into syrup by dissolving 1 teaspoon of the powder into 2 cups of filtered or distilled water. Then simmer this down into a thicker syrup then put it in a small bottle and refrigerate it to increase its shelf life.

   As a rule, the green powder is not very popular due to its aftertaste. However, it is widely available in health food stores. The majority of recipes call for stevia extract as opposed to the green powder so double-check your recipe and make sure you have the right form.

                       

White stevia extract

This is the form most commonly used in Japan, and generally contains 85 to 95 percent of the sweet glycosides. In this form, it is close to 300 times sweeter than sugar. A teaspoon of this extract has sweetening power equivalent to 2 to 4 cups of sugar. The sugar-type stevia packets found in many Japanese restaurants are bulked up with another substance (such as maltodextrin) since a much smaller amount of the extract itself is needed. One company in the US has also started marketing stevia in small packets, similarly adding maltodextrin. Could stevia ever become so popular in the US that practically every restaurant in the country would offer packets of this sweetener alongside the pink packets of Sweet' N Low and blue packets of Equal?

   There are hundreds of patents for stevia extraction processes existing around the world. Japan, itself, has over 150. Canadian researchers are hard at work to make a pure extraction process that they hope may completely eliminate the aftertaste. The type of extraction would influence the concentration of the various sweet glycosides, such as stevioside and rebaudioside, and could therefore influence its aftertaste. Thus, not all stevia powders are the same.

   Since extracted white stevia powder is so intensely sweet, we recommend that it be mixed with water and the solution used by the drop. You can dissolve 1 teaspoon of the powder with 3 tablespoons of filtered or sterile water. Once mixed, this solution should be stored in the refrigerator. You can then use it whenever you need a splash of sweetening when cooking. Generally one teaspoonful of this liquid solution, also called a 'working solution,' is roughly equivalent to one cup of sugar.

 

Stevia Liquid concentrates
These come in two distinctly different forms. One is a black, syrupy concentrate and the other is clear.

   The black, syrup-like concentrate is made by boiling the dried leaves in water. Traditionally, the Guarani Indians thought this crude liquid had medicinal benefits. It has a delicious taste that adds to the flavor of many foods, particularly hot beverages. A dropper-style bottle is the most common way that this form of stevia is found in stores.

   The clear type of liquid concentrate is made by mixing a large amount of the white powder in distilled water or grain alcohol. Some of these liquid preparations contain other ingredients such as chrysanthemum flowers.

   All types of liquid extract concentrates are available in health food stores or some retail outlets. They come in various sizes ranging from a third of an ounce to four ounce bottles. Generally a few drops of this concentrate is enough to sweeten a glass of tea, coffee or your favorite drink. With time, it's likely that stevia will appear on the shelves of grocery stores and pharmacies nationwide.

 

In Japan, and other countries that are familiar with the use of stevia, manufacturers have included this sweetener in several non-food products. These include toothpaste, gum and mouthwash. We hope that stevia will eventually be similarly used in this country.

 

Safety, toxicity tests

Stevia has been used as a sweetening ingredient in foods and drinks by South American natives for many centuries, and there is no report of any plant toxicity to the consumers (Suttajit, 1993). Stevia has been added to a number of food products in Japan since the mid 1970s. No indications of any significant side effects have yet been reported after more than 20 years of use. Similarly, no reports of any adverse reactions to stevia have been reported in the United States. Donna and her family have been using stevia since 1990 without any health problems. There are no indications at this point from any source that stevia has shown toxicity in humans. However, it is still important that we review the available safety studies done thus far.

 

A critical review of the genetic toxicity of steviol and steviol glycosides.
Food Chem Toxicol. 2008 Jul; Brusick DJ. Brusick Consultancy, 123 Moody Creek Road, Bumpass, VA 23024, United States. Brusick41@aol.com
Extracts of the leaves of the stevia plant (Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni) are used to sweeten food and beverages in South America, Japan and China. The components responsible for the sweet properties of the plant are glycosides of steviol, primary stevioside (ent-13-hydroxykaur-16-en-18-oic acid), which is 250-300 times sweeter than sucrose and rebaudiosides A and C. Stevioside and steviol have been subjected to extensive genetic testing. The majority of the findings show no evidence of genotoxic activity. Neither stevioside nor its aglycone steviol have been shown to react directly with DNA or demonstrate genotoxic damage in assays relevant to human risk. The mutagenic activity of steviol and some of its derivatives, exhibited in strain TM677, was not reproduced in the same bacteria having normal DNA repair processes. The single positive in vivo study measuring single-strand DNA breaks in Wistar rat tissues by stevioside, was not confirmed in experiments in mice and appears to be measuring processes other than direct DNA damage. Neither stevioside nor steviol-induced clastogenic effects at extremely high dose levels in vivo. Application of a Weight-of-Evidence approach to assess the genetic toxicology database concludes that these substances do not pose a risk of genetic damage following human consumption.

 

Our Daily Stevia Dose

It has been estimated that sugar consumption in Japan is about 80 grams a day while in the US and Europe it is between 120 to 140 g a day (Akashi). Assuming we substitute stevia for sugar, what would be our daily consumption?      
   For the sake of simplicity, let's say we consume about 100 grams of sugar a day. Since the sweetness of stevioside is 300 times that of sugar, the maximum daily consumption of stevia would be 100 grams divided by 300, or a third of a gram (roughly 330 mg). Actually, Chinese researchers have already estimated that the daily human consumption of stevioside would be about 2 mg per kilogram of body weight (Xili, 1992). This is a very small amount and we should keep this in mind when we evaluate the toxicity studies with Stevia done in animals. Another point to keep in mind is that most people would only partially substitute stevia for sugar and other sweeteners. Therefore, the intake of stevia on a daily basis would even be less than 330 mg.
   There have been a number of studies performed in rodents and other laboratory animals to determine whether stevia has any toxicity. In many of these studies, stevia was provided in extremely high dosages, sometimes up to 5 percent of the weight of their food. Let's compare this to humans. Assuming we eat about two kilograms of food a day, and we ingest 200 mg of Stevia, the proportion of Stevia to our daily food intake would be about 0.01 percent; a very small amount, indeed.
   Let's examine a few studies done over the past two decades with stevia.

 

Animal Studies

Whenever researchers want to test the dangers of a substance they give it to laboratory animals such as mice or rats. They give progressively higher doses of the substance until a lethal dose (LD) is reached where 50 percent of the test animals die. This level is called the LD 50. Back in the 1970s, several research groups attempted to find the lethal dose of stevia (Kinghorn, 1985). They discovered that, on average, a dose of 8,000 milligrams or more per kilogram of body weight was necessary to achieve this LD 50. In human terms, this would be equivalent to a 70 kg male ingesting more than 480,000 milligrams (or two pounds) of the extract. In most cases, a glass of water can be sweetened by less than 5 drops, an extremely minimal amount. As can be expected, no human has ever died from stevia overdose.

   In a study published in Japan in 1985, researchers determined that giving rats 550 mg/kg of body weight every day of stevioside for 2 years did not cause any abnormalities. However, could the ingestion of stevia cause abnormalities in the offspring? 
   In 1991, an excellent study was done by researchers at the Chulalongkorn University Primate Research Center in Bangkok, Thailand (Yodyingyuad, 1991). The researchers wanted to study the consequences of daily ingestion of stevioside in hamsters and the effects on two subsequent generations. (You may recall that stevioside is the main active sweetening agent in the stevia plant.) Three groups of 20 one-month-old hamsters (10 males and 10 females) were force-fed daily with stevioside, while the fourth group stayed as the controls; they did not get any stevioside. The first group was given 500 mg per kilogram of body weight; the second group got a higher dose at 1,000 mg per kilogram of body weight, and the third group got the highest dose at 2,500 mg per kilogram of body weight. The experiment was started with 80 one-month-old hamsters, 40 of each sex, each weighing between 30 and 50 grams. The 2,500 mg per kg of body weight would be equivalent to a human ingesting 150,000 mg. The likely amount most humans would ingest from sweetening their drinks and certain foods is often less than 500 mg.
   In the first generation, the average growth of the hamsters receiving various doses of stevioside did not differ significantly between each group. In the second generation, no significant difference in body weight was observed among groups of males receiving various doses of stevioside until 90 days of age. Thereafter, growth of males in the group receiving stevioside at 500 mg/kg of body weight was significantly higher than in the other groups. Nevertheless, male hamsters in the second and third groups grew the same amount as did the control group.
   In the third generation, at 120 days of age, no significant differences in body weights were observed in all groups of male and female animals. As to the mating performance, all three generations performed the same no matter what dose of stevioside they received. Their performance was equal to the controls.
   Microscopic examination of reproductive tissues from all experimental groups, both male and female, did not differ from the control group. The production of sperm was normal, even in the males who received the highest dose of stevioside. In the females, the ovaries of all the animals were perfectly normal.
   In summary, no abnormalities were found in growth and fertility in both sexes. All males mated females efficiently and successfully. Females became pregnant after mating. The duration of pregnancy, number of fetuses, as well as number of young delivered each time from females in the experimental groups were not significantly different from those in the control group. The researchers say, "The results of this study are astonishing. Stevioside at a dose as high as 2,500 mg /kg of body weight did not do any harm to these animals. We conclude that stevioside at a dose as high as 2.5 grams per kilogram of body weight affects neither growth nor reproduction in hamsters. If this is true in other mammalian species including humans, this substance will be of great benefit to industry and medicine, and can be used more widely as a non-caloric sweetener in a variety of foods and drinks as already seen in Japan and Brazil."

 

Stevia Safety Study

"Assessment of the carcinogenicity of stevioside in rats," was the title of an article published in the June, 1997 issue of Food and Chemical Toxicology. We were very excited and anxious when we came across this study. Was this latest information going to show that stevioside was safe, or potentially harmful?
   This study was performed by Dr. K. Toyoda and colleagues, from the Division of Pathology, National Institute of Health Sciences in Tokyo, Japan. For a period of 104 weeks (two years), three groups of rats were tested to receive either no stevioside (the controls), stevioside in a concentration of 2.5 percent of their diet, and stevioside in a concentration of 5 percent of their diet. There were 50 male and 50 female rats involved in the study. All surviving rats were killed at the end of week 108. The results showed the body weight of the rats was less in those who received the stevioside compared to the controls. This makes sense because stevioside has no calories. When the organs and tissues of the rats were examined under the microscope, there was no difference in the controls and those on stevioside, except females on stevioside had a decreased incidence of breast tumors, and the males had a lesser incidence of kidney damage. The researchers state, "It is concluded that stevioside is not carcinogenic in F344 rats under the experimental conditions described."
   You may recall at the start of this chapter that we estimated an average person's daily dietary intake of stevioside to be, at most, about 0.01 percent of the total daily intake of food. It is reassuring that rats given significantly higher amounts of this sweetener did not have a higher incidence of tumors. Our interpretation of this research would lead us to believe that the small amounts of stevioside we consume daily to be extremely safe.

   As you can see, stevia appears to be extremely safe. Nevertheless, it was banned for import in 1991. Where the reasons justified?

 

The FDA's (Genuine?) Concern

Stevia leaves and extracts were banned from importation in 1991. What prompted the FDA to ban the import of this natural sweetener?
   One possible explanation is the result of a 1985 laboratory study that hinted a biochemical breakdown product of stevia to be a possible health concern. This study was conducted at the College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois in Chicago (Pezutto). A strain of a bacterium called Salmonella typhimurium TM677, was exposed to stevioside and found not to have any problems. Many sweet-tasting chemicals related to stevioside were also found to not be of concern. However, steviol, a metabolite, or break down product of stevioside, caused some changes in the DNA of the bacterium. This only occurred in the presence of a liquid fraction derived from the livers of rats treated with a toxin called Aroclor 1254, and then exposed to NADPH. As you can see, this is getting a little complicated and farfetched. When steviol was given to the bacteria without first being exposed to the above toxins, there were no problems detected.
   When humans ingest stevia, their livers are not first damaged by a toxin and then directly given steviol. Therefore, in our opinion, the above study has little, if any, relevance to humans and is best ignored in light of the long-term rodent studies discussed previously. Those studies are more practical and relevant. You may recall that when rodents are given stevia in massive doses for at least two generations, no side effects occur.
   In case you have any concerns, a study performed in 1993 should comfort you. Researchers from the Department of Biochemistry at Chiang Mai University in Thailand, tested stevioside and steviol for mutagenicity (causing mutation, or changes in the DNA) using a strain of Salmonella typhimurium bacteria TA98 and TA100 (Suttajit). The sweeteners were also tested to see their effect on cultured human lymphocytes (types of while blood cells). The bacteria were cultured in a nutrient broth and then plated on a Petri dish or plate. Stevioside did not cause any mutations in either strains TA98 or TA98 at concentrations up to 25 mg per plate, but showed weak mutagenicity to only strain TA98 at an unusually high dose of 50 mg per plate. Even more important, no significant chromosomal effect of stevioside and steviol was observed in cultured human blood lymphocytes. The researchers state, "This study indicates that stevioside and steviol are neither mutagenic nor clastogenic [capable of causing damage to chromosomes] in vitro [in a test tube] at the limited doses." A similar study was repeated in 1997 at Mahidol University in Bangkok, Thailand. Stevioside and steviol were tested for mutagenic activity by the in vitro Ames test, a reincubation method, using Salmonella typhimurium TA 98 and TA 100 as the tester strains. Stevioside and steviol at the concentrations up to 50 mg and 2 mg per plate, respectively showed no mutagenic effect on both tester strains (Klongpanichpak, 1997).
   Another concern is the possible influence of stevia on fertility and reproduction. A 1988 study conducted in Brazil indicated that female mice given stevia plant in the form of a tea during the mating period had a reduced rate of fertility (Nunes, 1988). The researchers say, "We believe that this effect of stevia is due to the stevioside present in the leaves, although other glycosides and/or substances that are not glycosides but are also present in the plant may confound the obtained results."
   Since the availability of contraceptive research with stevia on humans is lacking, whether women trying to conceive can be similarly effected by stevia consumption is currently not known. For the time being, until formal human studies are conducted, it would seem prudent for women to reduce or minimize their stevia consumption before, and possibly during, pregnancy. It's unlikely that small amounts of stevia would have any significant effects on reproduction or the course of pregnancy.

 

Summary of the Safety Issue

One can study the influence of a particular chemical in an isolated Petri dish, or a test tube, or on rodents, ad infinitum but not know what this chemical will do in the human body when ingested in the small amounts normally consumed. In our opinion, having reviewed all the safety studies published thus far, and considering the safe, centuries-old consumption in south America, and the two decades-plus use of stevia by Japanese consumers, we conclude that stevia is safe for human consumption, particularly in the dosages normally consumed as a partial alternative to sugar, other natural sweeteners, and artificial sweeteners.

   Having reviewed all the published studies on stevia that had been available in 1991, we did not encounter any that would justify the great lengths the FDA undertook to ban the import of stevia to this country. In our opinion, there seems to be enough evidence to suspect the FDA, for some reason, was biased towards stevia.  

 

Effect on blood pressure
Apparent lack of pharmacological effect of steviol glycosides used as sweeteners in humans. A pilot study of repeated exposures in some normotensive and hypotensive individuals and in Type 1 and Type 2 diabetics.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2008 Jun; Barriocanal LA, Palacios M, Benitez G, Benitez S, Jimenez JT, Jimenez N, Rojas V. Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, 3rd Internal Medicine Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Clinical Hospital, National University Asunción, Mayor Bullo 315, Asuncion, Paraguay.
Steviol glycosides, isolated from the plant Stevia rebaudiana (Bertoni) Bertoni, have been used as safe sweetening agents for more than 30 years. Beneficial effects of high doses of steviol glycosides on hyperglycemia and hypertension have been previously described when these abnormalities are present. This study was designed to evaluate the effects of steviol glycosides on blood glucose and on blood pressure (BP) in 3 groups of individuals. This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, long-term study in three groups of patients: Group 1: subjects with Type 1 diabetes; Group 2: subjects with Type 2 diabetes; and Group 3: subjects without diabetes and with normal/low-normal BP levels. The subjects in each group were randomly allocated to active treatment (the steviol glycoside stevioside: 250mg t.d.s.) or to placebo treatment and followed-up for 3 months. Post-treatment systolic BP, diastolic BP, glucose and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) were not significantly different from baseline measurements, except for the placebo Type 1 diabetics group where a significant difference was observed for systolic BP and glucose. No side effects were observed in the two treatment groups. This study shows that oral steviol glycosides, taken as sweetener are well tolerated and have no pharmacological effect. Cochrane Library, online July 8, 2009.

 

Diabetes patients

The availability of artificial sweeteners has been of enormous benefit to those with diabetes. However, there's always been a concern that over consumption of these synthetic sweeteners may cause some unknown harm to the body. Could stevia substitution be a good alternative for those with diabetes? We believe so. Stevia leaves have been used as herbal teas by diabetic patients in Asian countries. No side effects have been observed in these patients after many years of continued consumption (Suttajit, 1993). Furthermore, studies have shown that stevia extract can actually improve blood sugar levels (Alvarez, 1981, Curi, 1986).
   In 1986, Brazilian researchers from the Universities of Maringa and Sao Paolo evaluated the role of stevia in blood sugar (Curi, 1986). Sixteen healthy volunteers were given extracts of 5 grams of stevia leaves every six hours for three days. The extracts from the leaves were prepared by immersing them in boiling water for 20 minutes. A glucose tolerance test (GTT) was performed before and after the administration of the extract and the results were compared to another group who did not receive the stevia extracts. During a GTT, patients are given a glass of water with glucose and their blood sugar levels are evaluated over the next few hours. Those who have a predisposition to diabetes will have a marked rise in blood sugar levels.
   The volunteers on stevia were found to have significantly lower blood sugar levels after ingestion of stevia. This is a positive indication that stevia can potentially be beneficial to diabetics who substitute stevia in order to decrease their sugar consumption. Even if stevia by itself is not able to lower blood sugar levels, just the fact that a diabetic would consume less sugar is of significant importance in maintaining better blood sugar control.
   If you have diabetes, chances are you consume a large amount of artificial sweeteners and you may be concerned about switching to stevia since long-term human studies have not been done with this herb. You may also be accustomed in your use of these artificial sweeteners and would not be willing to completely stop them. One option is to gradually use less of them while substituting stevia. For instance, you can initially use stevia in some of your drinks, like coffee or tea. After a few weeks, if your comfort level with stevia increases, you can gradually use more of the herbal extract. Over the next few weeks and months you can either switch completely to stevia, or you can continue using it in combination with artificial sweeteners. With time more research will become available on the safety of stevia and artificial sweeteners. Based on the results of these studies, you can determine which ones to continue using in a larger amount. It's also quite possible that artificial sweeteners may be safe in low amounts, but problems could arise when they are used in excessive quantities. By partially or mostly substituting stevia, you can reduce any potential risk. Stevia is a good supplement for those with diabetes.

 

Apparent lack of pharmacological effect of steviol glycosides used as sweeteners in humans. A pilot study of repeated exposures in some normotensive and hypotensive individuals and in Type 1 and Type 2 diabetics.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2008 June. Barriocanal LA, Palacios M, Benitez G, Benitez S, Jimenez JT, Jimenez N, Rojas V.
Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, 3rd Internal Medicine Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Clinical Hospital, National University Asunción, Mayor Bullo 315, Asuncion, Paraguay.
Steviol glycosides, isolated from the plant Stevia rebaudiana (Bertoni) Bertoni, have been used as safe sweetening agents for more than 30 years. Beneficial effects of high doses of steviol glycosides on hyperglycemia and hypertension have been previously described when these abnormalities are present. This study was designed to evaluate the effects of steviol glycosides on blood glucose and on blood pressure (BP) in 3 groups of individuals. This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, long-term study in three groups of patients: Group 1: subjects with Type 1 diabetes; Group 2: subjects with Type 2 diabetes; and Group 3: subjects without diabetes and with normal/low-normal BP levels. The subjects in each group were randomly allocated to active treatment (the steviol glycoside stevioside: 250mg t.d.s.) or to placebo treatment and followed-up for 3 months. Post-treatment systolic BP, diastolic BP, glucose and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) were not significantly different from baseline measurements, except for the placebo Type 1 diabetics group where a significant difference was observed for systolic blood pressure and glucose. No side effects were observed in the two treatment groups. This study shows that oral steviol glycosides, taken as sweetener are well tolerated and have no pharmacological effect.

 

Weight Loss

It would seem quite obvious that substituting a no-calorie sweetener to sugar would help reduce caloric intake and thus contribute to weight loss. And such is the case with aspartame. Researchers at the Center for the Study of Nutrition Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, at Harvard Medical School in Boston, Massachusetts, studied the influence of aspartame on obesity (Blackburn, 1997). One hundred sixty-three women were randomly assigned to consume or to abstain from aspartame-sweetened foods and beverages for 16 weeks. Both groups were also actively involved in a weight-control program using a variety of modalities. At the end of the 16 weeks, both the group on aspartame and the group without the synthetic sweetener lost 10 kilograms. During the maintenance phase that lasted the next two years, women assigned to the aspartame-treatment group gained back 4.5 kilogram, whereas those not on aspartame gained back 9.4 kilograms, practically all the weight they had previously lost. The researchers state, "These data suggest that participation in a multidisciplinary weight-control program that includes aspartame may facilitate the long-term maintenance of reduced body weight."

   Unfortunately, no formal studies have been done evaluating stevia substitution in relation to weight loss. We would suspect, though, that the results would be similar to the aspartame study discussed above. If you are the type of person who adds sugar to your morning coffee or tea, or to iced tea, lemonade, and a variety of desserts and baked goods, then, over time, the elimination of these refined sugar calories could make a difference.

 

Sweet Teeth with No Cavities

Even a five-year old child knows that sugar causes tooth cavities. There are certain bacteria in our mouths, particularly streptococci mutans, that ferment various sugars to produce acids. These in turn eat through the enamel of the tooth causing pockets or cavities. For a long time, scientists have searched to find alternative sweeteners that are not fermentable by bacteria and hence do not cause cavities. Artificial sweeteners have been helpful in this regard.

   Does ingesting stevia lead to tooth cavities? A study done on rats has not shown this to be case. Stevioside and rebaudioside A, the two primary sweet constituents of the stevia plant, were tested in a group of sixty rat pups (Das, 1992) in the following way:

 

Group 1 was fed sucrose (table sugar), at 30 percent of their diet

Group 2 was given 0.5 percent of their diet in stevioside

Group 3 got 0.5 percent of their diet in rebaudioside A

Group 4 ingested no sugars.

 

   After 5 weeks, all four groups had their teeth evaluated. There were no differences in food and water intake and weight gain between the four groups. However, the first group had significantly more cavities than the rest of the groups. Groups 2, 3, and 4 were equivalent. 
   The researchers state, "It was concluded that neither stevioside nor rebaudioside A is cariogenic [cavity causing] under the conditions of this study." It appears that the chemicals within the stevia plant that impart its sweetness are not fermentable, and thus do not cause tooth cavities.

 

Use in Children

Candies, sodas, ice cream, pies, cakes... it's disturbing how many sweet products are ingested by children on a daily basis. All that sugar can lead to tooth cavities and obesity. We believe that partially substituting with stevia can help children satisfy their sweet tooth while decreasing the risks from excessive sugar intake.

            If you're a parent, you can take advantage of the many recipes provided in the second half of this book to provide your children with tasty sweets that will satisfy their sweet teeth but not cause damage to the teeth. Obesity in children is a growing problem in this country and any method we have of helping children reduce their caloric intake will be greatly beneficial.

            We also are concerned with children overconsuming excessive amounts of artificial sweeteners. The potential, long-term health consequences of saccharin and aspartame ingestion are currently not fully known, but they do need to be kept in mind. Eliminating all artificial sweeteners will be a frustrating enterprise since they are extremely prevalent. However, by partially substituting stevia in homemade desserts, you can significantly reduce your children's exposure to these artificial chemicals.

            Hopefully, with time, stevia can be added to a variety of sodas, candies, gums, and other foods in the US, just like it currently is in Japan and other countries.

 

Blood Pressure

In 1991, Dr. M.S. Melis, from the Department of Biology at the University of Sao Paulo in Brazil, gave a one-time high dose injection of stevioside to rats and found that it caused a reduction in blood pressure as well as an increased elimination of sodium (Melis, 1991). A slight diuretic effect also occurred. The effect was additive when stevia was combined with verapamil (a medicine used to lower blood pressure in humans who have high blood pressure).

   Dr. Melis repeated a similar study in 1995. This time, he administered extracts of stevia to rats for 20, 40, and 60 days. After 20 days, there were no changes in the stevia-treated rats compared to the control group (the ones that didn't receive the extracts). However, after 40 or 60 days of administering the extract, there was a lowering of blood pressure, a diuretic effect was noted along with loss of sodium. The amount of blood going to the kidneys was increased.

   When normal human volunteers between the ages of 20 to 40 years were given a tea prepared with stevia leaves, a lowering of blood pressure occurred (Boeck, 1981). This study was done in Brazil. Certainly more human studies are needed before we can come to any conclusions regarding the full effect of normal daily ingestion of stevioside on blood pressure.
 

Use in Pregnancy or Breast Feeding

Since human studies providing stevia during pregnancy have not been done, we don't know whether its use during this period is safe. We suspect, though, that small amounts of stevia would not cause any problems. However, we will not know for certain until studies are completed.
 

Anti-Aging potential?

We know from numerous animal studies that reducing caloric intake leads to life span extension. Since stevia can substitute for sugar, and we know excess amounts of this sweetener can contribute to high blood sugar, obesity, and have other unhealthy effects on the human body, it would seem likely that substituting stevia for sugar could have a positive effect on longevity. This effect would be most apparent in those who normally have a high intake of sugar.
   Glucose (sugar) has been implicated in the aging process by its ability to react with some proteins, like collagen, to produce glycation. That is, the glucose molecule attaches to some amino acids of a protein and makes the protein less functional, leading to disturbances within a cell. The initial phase of this attachment is called glycation. As we age, the amount of glycation of the proteins in our bodies tends to increase. We should also note that blood sugar generally increases as we age. It is known that glycation of human tendon and aortic collagen increases with age in proportion to the increase in blood glucose that occurs with aging (Schleicher, 1996 and 1997).
   This age-related increase in glycation, though, can be partially prevented by caloric restriction. In other words, avoiding high sugar consumption, and high caloric consumption, could theoretically, over the years and decades, help our proteins stay healthier. Practical ways to use this information include:

 

1) Eat small frequent meals throughout the day instead of one or two excessively large ones. Eating these small meals, or snacks, will help maintain your blood sugar at a relatively steady state, instead of wide fluctuations.

 

2) Make sure to have some protein with each meal. Avoid a purely carbohydrate meal, except if you are planning to induce sleep at night. Carbohydrates, eaten an hour or two before bed, help us get sleepy. Your carbohydrate intake should mostly be from unprocessed whole grains, vegetables and legumes.

 

3) Even relatively “healthy” drinks, such as fruit juices, can cause significant elevation of blood sugar when consumed in large amounts, such as 6 ounces or more. Many people quickly gulp down 8 ounces of orange juice in the morning, in addition to a cup of coffee laced with a teaspoon or two of sugar.

 

4) And, of course, substitute this sweetener for cane sugar whenever possible.

 

 

Sweet Teeth with No Cavities
Even a five-year old child knows that sugar causes tooth cavities. There are certain bacteria in our mouths, particularly streptococci mutans, that ferment various sugars to produce acids. These in turn eat through the enamel of the tooth causing pockets or cavities. For a long time, scientists have searched to find alternative sweeteners that are not fermentable by bacteria and hence do not cause cavities. Artificial sweeteners have been helpful in this regard. Fortunately, studies with stevia indicate that it does not cause tooth cavities.

 

Use in Children
Candies, sodas, ice cream, pies, cakes... it's disturbing how many sweet products are ingested by children on a daily basis. All that sugar can lead to tooth cavities and obesity. Partially substituting with stevia can help children satisfy their sweet tooth while decreasing the risks from excessive sugar intake. If you're a parent, you can take advantage of the many recipes provided in The Stevia Cookbook to provide your children with tasty sweets that will satisfy their sweet teeth but not cause damage to the teeth. Obesity in children is a growing problem in this country and any method we have of helping children reduce their caloric intake will be greatly beneficial. There is also a concern with children consuming excessive amounts of artificial sweeteners. The potential, long-term health consequences of saccharin and aspartame ingestion are currently not fully known, but they do need to be kept in mind. Eliminating all artificial sweeteners will be a frustrating enterprise since they are extremely prevalent. However, by partially substituting stevia in homemade desserts, you can significantly reduce your children's exposure to these artificial chemicals.

 

Use in Pregnancy or Breast Feeding
Since human studies providing stevia during pregnancy have not been done, it is not known whether its use during this period is safe. It’s very likely that small amounts of stevia would not cause any problems.

Practical Tips
Those who are novices at using stevia often make the mistake of using too much. Since stevia is 300 times sweeter than sugar, excessive amounts can lead to over-sweetness and an aftertaste. Generally, one teaspoon of stevia would be equivalent to one cup of sugar, while a quarter teaspoon would be equivalent to one tablespoon of sugar. Stevia is available in concentrated liquid form, and often two to four drops of stevia liquid added to tea or coffee is sufficient to sweeten the drink.

Diabetes and hypertension
The popularity of stevia continues to grow as more and more people find out about this amazing no-calorie herbal sweetener. One of the primary constituents of stevia that gives it its sweet taste is stevioside, which has been commercialized as a sweetener in Japan for more than 25 years. Lately, studies have shown that stevia, in addition to being a sweetener, has certain health benefits, too, particularly for diabetics and those with elevated blood pressure.

   Diabetes -- Stevioside reduces postprandial blood glucose levels in type 2 diabetic patients, indicating beneficial effects on the glucose metabolism. Stevia has been used for many years in the treatment of diabetes among Indians in Paraguay and Brazil. However, the mechanism for the blood glucose-lowering effect remains unknown. A study conducted at Aarhus University Hospital in Denmark found that stevioside enhances insulin secretion from mouse pancreatic islets in the presence of glucose. The researchers state, “Stevioside stimulates insulin secretion via a direct action on pancreatic beta cells. The results indicate that the compounds may have a potential role as an anti-hyperglycemic agent in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus.”
   Hypertension -- In a 2-year study in Chinese patients with mild hypertension, oral stevioside significantly decreased blood pressure compared with placebo. No significant adverse effects were noted.
   A double-blind, placebo-controlled study in Taiwan studied 106 Chinese hypertensive subjects ages ranging from 28 to 75 years. Each subject was given capsules containing 250 mg stevioside or placebo three times daily and followed-up at monthly intervals for 1 year (the average person who uses stevia ingests about 100 mg a day of stevioside). After 3 months, the systolic and diastolic blood pressure of the stevioside group decreased by about 6 points, and the effect persisted during the whole year. Blood biochemistry including lipid and glucose showed no major changes. No significant adverse effects were observed.
 

Our Daily Stevia Dose
It has been estimated that sugar consumption in Japan is about 80 grams a day while in the US and Europe it is between 120 to 140 mg a day (Akashi). Assuming we substitute stevia for sugar, what would be our daily consumption?
For the sake of simplicity, let's say we consume about 100 grams of sugar a day. Since the sweetness of stevioside is 300 times that of sugar, the maximum daily consumption of stevia would be 100 grams divided by 300, or a third of a gram (roughly 330 mg). Actually, Chinese researchers have already estimated that the daily human consumption of stevioside would be about 2 mg per kilogram of body weight (Xili, 1992). This is a very small amount and we should keep this in mind when we evaluate the toxicity studies with Stevia done in animals. Another point to keep in mind is that most people would only partially substitute stevia for sugar and other sweeteners. Therefore, the intake of stevia on a daily basis would even be less than 330 mg.
   There have been a number of studies performed in rodents and other laboratory animals to determine whether stevia has any toxicity. In many of these studies, stevia was provided in extremely high dosages, sometimes up to 5 percent of the weight of their food. Let's compare this to humans. Assuming we eat about two kilograms of food a day, and we ingest 200 mg of Stevia, the proportion of Stevia to our daily food intake would be about 0.01 percent; a very small amount, indeed.
Let's examine a few studies done over the past two decades with stevia.
 

Animal Studies
Whenever researchers want to test the dangers of a substance they give it to laboratory animals such as mice or rats. They give progressively higher doses of the substance until a lethal dose (LD) is reached where 50 percent of the test animals die. This level is called the LD 50. Back in the 1970s, several research groups attempted to find the lethal dose of stevia. They discovered that, on average, a dose of 8,000 milligrams or more per kilogram of body weight was necessary to achieve this LD 50. In human terms, this would be equivalent to a 70 kg male ingesting more than 480,000 milligrams (or about one pound) of the extract. In most cases, a glass of water can be sweetened by less than 5 drops, an extremely minimal amount. As can be expected, no human has ever died from stevia overdose.
   In a study published in Japan in 1985, researchers determined that giving rats 550 mg/kg of body weight every day of stevia stevioside for 2 years did not cause any abnormalities. However, could the ingestion of stevia cause abnormalities in the offspring?
   In 1991, an excellent study was done by researchers at the Chulalongkorn University Primate Research Center in Bangkok, Thailand. The researchers wanted to study the consequences of daily ingestion of stevioside in hamsters and the effects on two subsequent generations. (You may recall that stevioside is the main active sweetening agent in the stevia plant.) Three groups of 20 one-month-old hamsters (10 males and 10 females) were force-fed daily with stevia stevioside, while the fourth group stayed as the controls; they did not get any stevia. The first group was given 500 mg per kilogram of body weight; the second group got a higher dose at 1,000 mg per kilogram of body weight, and the third group got the highest dose at 2,500 mg per kilogram of body weight. The experiment was started with 80 one-month-old hamsters, 40 of each sex, each weighing between 30 and 50 grams. The 2,500 mg per kg of body weight would be equivalent to a human ingesting 150,000 mg. The likely amount of stevia most humans would ingest from sweetening their drinks and certain foods is often less than 500 mg.
   In the first generation, the average growth of the hamsters receiving various doses of stevioside did not differ significantly between each group. In the second generation, no significant difference in body weight was observed among groups of males receiving various doses of stevioside until 90 days of age. Thereafter, growth of males in the group receiving stevioside at 500 mg/kg of body weight was significantly higher than in the other groups. Nevertheless, male hamsters in the second and third groups on stevia grew the same amount as did the control group.
   In the third generation of those on stevia, at 120 days of age, no significant differences in body weights were observed in all groups of male and female animals. As to the mating performance, all three generations performed the same no matter what dose of stevia they received. Their performance was equal to the controls.
   Microscopic examination of reproductive tissues from all stevia groups, both male and female, did not differ from the control group. The production of sperm was normal, even in the males who received the highest dose of stevia. In the females taking stevia, the ovaries of all the animals were perfectly normal.
   In summary, no abnormalities were found in growth and fertility in both sexes on stevia. All males mated females efficiently and successfully. Females on stevia became pregnant after mating. The duration of pregnancy, number of fetuses, as well as number of young delivered each time from females in sevia groups were not significantly different from those in the control group. The researchers say, "The results of this study are astonishing. Stevioside at a dose as high as 2,500 mg /kg of body weight did not do any harm to these animals. We conclude that stevioside at a dose as high as 2.5 grams per kilogram of body weight affects neither growth nor reproduction in hamsters. If this is true in other mammalian species including humans, stevia will be of great benefit to industry and medicine, and can be used more widely as a non-caloric sweetener in a variety of foods and drinks as already seen in Japan and Brazil."

As you can see, stevia appears to be extremely safe. Nevertheless, it was banned for import in 1991. Where the reasons justified?

 

Review
Hopefully, with time, stevia can be added to a variety of sodas, candies, gums, and other foods in the US, just like it currently is in Japan and other countries. And we could see stevia packets at restaurants.

 

SO LONG, SUGAR...
Our health would be greatly enhanced if we could only reduce the amount of sugar we consume, especially refined sugar. At four calories per gram, basically void of any nutrients, with a fantastic ability to raise blood sugar and stimulate a wicked insulin response, you're better off not even walking near the aisle where it's shelved at your local grocery store. If you already have an unopened five-pound bag at home, consider using it for something useful--say a doorstop. Sure, we're being a bit harsh on sugar. It does have some assets, other than its sweet taste, that have contributed to its overwhelming popularity with chefs and bakers. We'll discuss these assets later.
   Fortunately, with the availability of this natural sweetener, we can greatly reduce our consumption of white, refined sugar. By blending stevia with high-quality, healthier sweet products (mineral-rich natural sugars such as molasses, barley malt, fruit juices, rice syrup, and honey), we can still have delicious low- or no-sugar meals and treats. Many of the recipes in this book use stevia as the exclusive sweetening agent. We're confident you generally will find their sweetness just as appealing as traditional recipes that use sugar. In other recipes we've greatly reduced the amount of sugar that's called for and substituted stevia. For instance, the French Chocolate Ice Cream recipe originally called for one cup of sugar. We found that by adding a tiny amount of stevia we could reduce the sugar volume to one-quarter cup and still have a delicious dessert. As you read these recipes, you may want to follow them exactly, or you may wish to take off on your own path and create recipes using a combination of stevia and other sweeteners if stevia, alone, does not satisfy your sweet tooth.
  Over the past few years Donna has been experimenting with stevia to create delicious recipes. In Atlanta, where she currently lives, chefs have created a wonderful variety of beverages, smoothies, baked goods (pies, cakes, cookies), sorbets, ice creams, puddings, and even different flavors of stevia-sweetened cheesecakes. One restaurant, R. Thomas Deluxe Grill in Buckhead, makes an organic butternut squash pie with whipped cream (both with stevia) that is extremely popular with their health-conscious patrons. You can take pride in joining those who are working to offer Americans healthier, higher quality sweets--without sacrificing taste.
   When you start using stevia in your recipes, you will find that it has a number of advantages--and also some drawbacks. Let's discuss them:

Advantages
Stevia is, in many cases, a flavor enhancer. This can be experienced when you add stevia to lemon juice, clearly heightening the flavor of the lemon. It is an appropriate sweetener for many types of foods since it is stable in acid foods (like tomato, pineapple, and limes). Cooking stevia at high temperatures does not destroy its sweetening properties. The artificial sweetener aspartame is not suitable for cooking and cannot make this claim. When heated, stevia does not ferment nor discolor.

Stevia is not perfect
Foods baked with stevia do not rise as much as those baked with sugar. In certain baked recipes, the complete elimination of sugar may not be possible. In addition to contributing necessary sweetness, sugar's crystalline structure provides texture to baked goods, aids in the creaming and whipping process during mixing, creates softening or spreading action to batter, caramelizes, and enhances browning.

Sugar feeds the fermentation of yeast and retains moisture. Stevia is not suitable for these purposes. Some users of stevia are sensitive to the slight aftertaste. We've found that baking and cooking usually reduce this aftertaste. If you have been using the artificial sweeteners such as aspartame and saccharin, they also have a noticeable aftertaste. If you experiment with different stevia products, you will find that there are slight differences in their sweetness, and even in the aftertaste. Try at least two or three different products to identify one that you find most suitable for your needs. If you use the green powder, it may slightly change the color of your food. You can avoid this by using the white powdered extract.  Most of the recipes in this book use the white stevia powder or the liquid concentrate made from the white powder.

Practical Tips and Suggestions
A common mistake beginners make with stevia is using too much of it in recipes. Since stevia is up to 300 times sweeter than sugar, excessive amounts can lead to over-sweetness and an aftertaste. For instance, Dr. Sahelian's mom followed the recipe of the oatmeal cookies suggested in this book. The recipe asked for 3/4 teaspoon of stevia. She tried two batches, one with 3/4 teaspoon of stevia, a second with one teaspoon. The second batch had a mild, but noticeable, aftertaste. The first batch was delicious.

When you first start using stevia, you may not be accustomed to its taste. Mixing stevia with even a tiny amount of another sweetener like honey will change the aftertaste. It can also have a synergistic effect with other sweeteners; a little goes a long way, so use it sparingly when combining.

When creating new recipes in your own kitchen, stevia's unique sweet flavor when used with neutral or mild-flavored foods is often noticeable. A little can even overpower the original flavor. Stevia's taste disappears in strong flavors and blends especially well in citrus flavors such as lemon and cranberry. Most fruits also go very well with stevia. Stevia is delicious with dairy foods (yogurt, cream, ice cream, kefir) and also with chocolate and carob. If you are one of the millions of Americans who have a love affair with chocolate, you'll be delighted to know that stevia and chocolate, and carob, are perfect partners.

When adapting a favorite recipe, you may need to slightly increase the amount of liquid (egg, water, milk) called for in your recipe. Be careful with those eggs, though. Too many eggs can "toughen" your finished product. However, eggs do help provide the "rise" or leavening to baked goods.

In creating the recipes for this book, we found our greatest challenge was creating cakes and cookies. These are made mostly with flour and a large amount of sugar. The two together provide the "rise" or fluffiness to cake. Flour, having a slightly bitter nature, is not as delicious with stevia as with other foods. Adding other flavors like grated lemon peel and nuts helps improve the flavor, but achieving the fluffiness is difficult. One alternative is to create thinner cakes that could be put together in many layers with various kinds of icings in between.

Sugar gives icings and fillings "body." To make an icing or filling using stevia, we've found that combining it with fruit spreads and nut berries provides the creaminess and spreading quality that is missing when you do away with the sugar.

Recipe books put out by the NutraSweet and Equal companies and recipes for diabetics are good sources for ideas. Substitute natural stevia for the recipes that call for artificial sweeteners.

Baking with Stevia extract
As we mentioned above, baked goods using only stevia do not brown well. Use your sense of touch and smell to decide when your muffins or cakes are done. When your kitchen fills with a wonderful smell, open your oven door and poke the muffin or cake to see if it is "springy" to the touch. If so, then they're ready to eat. Baked goods with chocolate and carob mask stevia's aftertaste and contribute a rich brown color. We do not recommend using stevia to bake yeast breads; the yeast must be activated by sugar, or the bread won't rise.

Conversion rate
Let's say you've decided to incorporate stevia in your diet. How do you determine how much to use? Unfortunately, we can't give you an exact answer for several reasons. Very sour foods like cranberries and lemons would need more sweetening than a pie baked with apples or pears since the those are naturally sweet. Then there's personal preference. Some of us don't like foods too sweet, while others have a sweet tooth. There's also a cultural difference. As a rule, Americans like their foods sweeter than those of other countries. To complicate matters even more, there are a number of different companies making stevia. The quality, flavor, and sweetness varies from product to product. Your best option is to try a few different brands and choose the one that best suits your needs. Through practical experience, we've found the following approximate equivalences It is worth mentioning again that different products on the market could provide different sweetness equivalences.

One cup sugar = about half a teaspoon of white stevia powder = about one teaspoon of stevia liquid concentrate
One tablespoon sugar = about six to nine drops of stevia liquid extract
One teaspoon of sugar = about two to three drops of stevia liquid extract

    If you are new to cooking with stevia, always start with either the exact amount of stevia the recipe calls for, or a slightly smaller amount. Then taste the batter, sauce, salad dressing or smoothie to see if it's sweet enough before adding more. If you purchase white stevia powder you may find it a little harder to work with when you only need the tiniest amount of sweetening power. Even the amount you might gather onto the point of a dinner knife might be too much in a cup of tea or coffee. We recommend turning the powder into a "working solution." Dissolve one teaspoon of white powder into three tablespoon of filtered water, pour into a dropper bottle, and then refrigerate. Or, you can just buy any of the ready-made stevia liquid concentrates from a health food store or the mail-order firms listed in the resource section of this book. Some communities may have stevia available in pharmacies, grocery stores, or retail outlets.

SWEET DRINKS ARE MADE OF THESE
The chemicals within stevia that make it taste sweet are stable in all types of liquids and do not lose their sweetness (Kinghorn, 1985). Thus, a number of drinks can be superbly sweetened with stevia. All it takes is usually two to five drops of liquid stevia per glass. Once you get into the habit of using stevia in your drinks, you'll never feel the need to buy the pink or blue packets, or even use honey. However, if you really like honey with your drinks, you can use less of it while adding a drop or two of stevia. We both are now in the habit of carrying small stevia bottles when we go out to restaurants or when we travel. This way, we can sweeten our drinks with stevia even when not at home. Please note that for blender drinks, it is best to add the stevia in the beginning of the process. Adding it later may cause a thinning of the product. The following are some examples of drinks that you can easily sweeten with stevia extract.

Lemonade and lemon juice. Not only does this herbal extract provide sweetness, it actually slightly enhances the flavor of the lemon. You can now serve lemonade to your kids on a hot summer afternoon without loading them up with high doses of harmful sugar.

Iced Tea. Forget sugar or artificial sweeteners. Stevia's the one to use.

            Sodas. A number of types of sodas in Japan have been sweetened using stevia since the mid-1970s. We hope that over the next few years, the FDA will allow stevia to be added to soft drinks. Thus, the consumption of saccharin and aspartame will decrease.

Herbal teas--We have tried stevia in quite a variety of herbal teas and it works well in all cases. The liquid extracts are perfect for teas. Have you considered having a variety of different herbal teas on your kitchen counter? Each morning you could try a different one. Some examples that we have tried include ginger, licorice, Earl gray, elderberry, dandelion, St. John's wort, kava, ginkgo, green, black, cinnamon, ginseng, echinacea, peppermint, goldenseal, fenugreek, and others. You could add the stevia drops after you brew the tea bag, or better yet, add the drops in the glass before you pour the hot water. As a rule, two to five drops of the liquid extract will provide enough sweetness to satisfy most people.

Coffee. Stevia is a perfect substitute for the artificial sweeteners. The amount of stevia used in coffee will be similar to the herbal teas. If you drink a few cups of coffee a day, and let's say you use two teaspoons of sugar per cup, just imagine how many calories a day you will not consume if you switch to stevia!

Hot cocoa with milk and stevia on a cold winter night in a Swiss chalet. How delicious!

Shakes and Smoothies--There are enough carbohydrate calories from fructose in these drinks. Why add additional sugar calories when you can use stevia. Actually, most shakes and smoothies are sweet enough on their own and, unless you really have a sweet tooth, there's no need to have additional sweeteners.

 

Research studies
Antihyperglycemic effects of stevioside in type 2 diabetic subjects.
Metabolism. 2004 Jan;53(1):73-6.
Stevioside is present in the plant Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni. Extracts of stevia have been used for the treatment of diabetes in, for example, Brazil, although a positive effect on glucose metabolism has not been unequivocally demonstrated. We studied the acute effects of stevioside in type 2 diabetic patients. We hypothesize that supplementation with stevia stevioside to a test meal causes a reduction in postprandial blood glucose. Twelve type 2 diabetic patients were included in an acute, paired cross-over study. A standard test meal was supplemented with either 1 g of stevioside or 1 g of maize starch (control). Blood samples were drawn at 30 minutes before and for 240 minutes after ingestion of the test meal. Compared to control, stevioside reduced the incremental area under the glucose response curve by 18%. The insulinogenic index (AUC(i,insulin)/AUC(i,glucose)) was increased by approximately 40% by stevioside compared to control. Stevioside tended to decrease glucagon levels, while it did not significantly alter the area under the insulin, glucagon-like peptide 1, and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide curves. In conclusion, stevioside reduces postprandial blood glucose levels in type 2 diabetic patients, indicating beneficial effects on the glucose metabolism. Stevia Stevioside may be advantageous in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. 
 

Efficacy and tolerability of oral stevioside in patients with mild essential hypertension: a two-year, randomized, placebo-controlled study.
Hsieh MH. Taipei Medical University--Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan.
Clin Ther. 2003 Nov;25(11):2797-808.
Stevioside, a natural glycoside isolated from the plant Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni, has been used as a commercial sweetening agent in Japan and Brazil for >20 years. Previous animal and human studies have indicated that stevioside (stevia) has an antihypertensive effect. This study was undertaken to investigate the long-term (2-year) efficacy and tolerability of stevia in patients with mild essential hypertension. Secondary objectives were to determine the effects of stevia on left ventricular mass index (LVMI) and quality of life (QOL). This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in Chinese men and women aged between 20 and 75 years with mild essential hypertension (systolic blood pressure [SBP] 140-159 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure [DBP] 90-99 mm Hg). Patients took capsules containing 500 mg stevioside powder or placebo 3 times daily for 2 years. After 2 years, the stevia group had significant decreases in mean (SD) SBP and DBP compared with baselineand compared with placebo). There were no significant changes in body mass index or blood biochemistry, and the results of laboratory tests were similar in the 2 groups throughout the study. No significant difference in the incidence of adverse effects was noted between groups, and QOL scores were significantly improved overall with stevia compared with placebo. Neither group had a significant change in mean LVMI. However, after 2 years, 6 of 52 patients (11.5%) in the stevia group had left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), compared with 17 of 50 patients (34.0%) in the placebo group. Of those who did not have LVH at baseline, 3 of 46 patients (6.5%) in the stevia group had developed LVH after 2 years, compared with 9 of 37 patients (24.3%) in the placebo group. In this 2-year study in Chinese patients with mild hypertension, oral stevia significantly decreased SBP and DBP compared with placebo. QOL was improved, and no significant adverse effects were noted.
 

Antihyperglycemic effects of stevioside in type 2 diabetic subjects.
Gregersen S,. Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.
Metabolism. 2004 Jan;53(1):73-6.
Stevioside is present in the plant Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni (stevia). Extracts of stevia have been used for the treatment of diabetes in, for example, Brazil, although a positive effect on glucose metabolism has not been unequivocally demonstrated. We studied the acute effects of stevioside (stevia) in type 2 diabetic patients. We hypothesize that supplementation with stevia to a test meal causes a reduction in postprandial blood glucose. Twelve type 2 diabetic patients were included in an acute, paired cross-over study. A standard test meal was supplemented with either 1 g of stevioside or 1 g of maize starch (control). Blood samples were drawn at 30 minutes before and for 240 minutes after ingestion of the test meal. Compared to control, stevia reduced the incremental area under the glucose response curve by 18%. The insulinogenic index was increased by approximately 40% by stevia compared to control. Stevia tended to decrease glucagon levels. In conclusion, stevia reduces postprandial blood glucose levels in type 2 diabetic patients, indicating beneficial effects on the glucose metabolism. Stevia may be advantageous in the treatment of type 2 diabetes.


Stevia lowers blood pressure
Chan P, et al. A double-blind placebo-controlled study of the effectiveness and tolerability of oral stevioside in human hypertension. Taipei Wan Fang Hospital, Taiwan.: Br J Clin Pharmacol 2000 50(3):215-20
A multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was undertaken. This study group consisted of 106 Chinese hypertensive subjects with diastolic blood pressure between 95 and 110 mmHg and ages ranging from 28 to 75 years with 60 subjects (men 34, women 26) allocated to active treatment and 46 (men 19, women 27) to placebo treatment. Each subject was given capsules containing stevioside stevia (250 mg) or placebo thrice daily and followed-up at monthly intervals for 1 year. After 3 months, the systolic and diastolic blood pressure of the stevia group decreased significantly and the effect persisted during the whole year. Blood biochemistry parameters including lipid and glucose showed no significant changes. No significant adverse effect was observed and quality of life assessment showed no deterioration. This study shows that oral stevia is a well tolerated and effective modality that may be considered as an alternative or supplementary therapy for patients with hypertension.


Stevia helpful for diabetes and hypertension
Jeppesen PB, et al. Stevioside acts directly on pancreatic beta cells to secrete insulin. Metabolism 2000 Feb;49(2):208-14.
The popularity of stevia continues to grow as more and more people find out about this amazing no-calorie herbal sweetener. One of the primary constituents of stevia that gives it its sweet taste is stevioside, which has been commercialized as a sweetener in Japan for more than 25 years. Lately, studies have shown that stevia, in addition to being a sweetener, has certain health benefits, too, particularly for diabetics and those with elevated blood pressure.
    Stevia has been used for many years in the treatment of diabetes among Indians in Paraguay and Brazil. However, the mechanism for the blood glucose-lowering effect remains unknown. A study conducted at Aarhus University Hospital in Denmark found that stevioside enhances insulin secretion from mouse pancreatic islets in the presence of glucose. The researchers state, "Stevioside stimulates insulin secretion via a direct action on pancreatic beta cells. The results indicate that the compounds may have a potential role as an anti-hyperglycemic agent in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus."
    A double-blind, placebo-controlled study in Taiwan studied 106 Chinese hypertensive subjects ages ranging from 28 to 75 years. Each subject was given capsules containing 250 mg stevioside or placebo three times daily and followed-up at monthly intervals for 1 year (the average person who uses stevia ingests about 100 mg a day of stevioside). After 3 months, the systolic and diastolic blood pressure of the stevioside group decreased by about 6 points, and the effect persisted during the whole year. Blood biochemistry including lipid and glucose showed no major changes. No significant adverse effects were observed.
    Dr. Sahelian comments: Stevia is a wonderful alternative to sugar and artificial sweeteners for those who have diabetes. The first study mentioned above gives us one more reason to recommend diabetics take advantage of this safe, no-calorie herbal sweetener. The second study indicates that not only stevia is safe for those with hypertension, but can actually reduce blood pressure.

Stevia Emails
Q. I suffer from fructose intolerant. I am wondering if stevia is safe for those of us who suffer from this disease. Also I am needing the Chemical breakdown of this sugar in the body. I am not able to digest fructose, sucrose, honey, molassas, splenda, or just about any regular sugar. I am also not a fan of the diet industry puting aspartime in foods, it taste nasty and is not good for you. If you could please look into this for me I will tell everyone on the fructose intolerant forum about this sugar and hopefully we can live a better life.
     A. Stevia contains stevioside, a compound that has a unique structure far different than fructose or any sugar. We don't see any relationship, even remotely, between the stevia chemical structure and sugars.


I have been using stevia since 1988. I'm a 55 year old female. There are no ill effects from this product. I use stevia in yerba mate tea daily. I drink at least 12 cups, every day for all these years. I was recently in a very bad accident and had my back fractured in four places. I'm up, going and getting back my physical strength. I truly believe the tea and stevia are responsible for my well being.

Q. I purchased some stevia from a local health food store. I have tried using stevia to sweeten desserts but we find it to be very bitter. Are different stevia brands different?
   A. Yes, there are differences between brands. I prefer the stevia clear liquid. Most people make the mistake of using too much stevia thus tasting the bitterness. Try smaller amounts and a different brand.

Q. Is this herb safe to use for persons with hypoglycemia?
   A. Most of the time stevia is used in such small quantities that it should not influence blood sugar to any significant extent.

Q. I have kidney failure - will be on dialysis soon. Is there anything known about using stevia with this condition?
   A. Stevia should be safe to use in kidney failure.

Q. You had an artcle in the February 2000 "Better Nutrition" magazine entitled "Suddenly Stevia". In the article you said that the Japanese have used stevia to sweeten a number of products, including chewing gum. But you go on and say that these such foods are prohibited in the United States. I know that I have purchased teas with stevia at local health food stores. The chewing gum is what I was really interested in and I was wondering if I could order it from Japan or would that be prohibited too?
   A. Stevia can be added to certain teas and other products, but the label cannot claim that stevia is being used as a sweetener. I don't know the legality of ordering stevia enriched foods from Japan.
 

References
Alvarez
M, Bazzote RB, Godoy GL, et al. Effect of aqueous extract of Stevia rebaudiana Bertone on biochemical parameters of normal adult persons. Arq Biol Tech 24:178, 1981. A daily dose of 250 mg of stevioside from stevia four times a day on the glucose tolerance test showed a marked hypoglycemic effect.
Akashi
J, Yokohama S. Safety of extract of dried Stevia leaves--results of toxicity tests. Shokuhin Kogya 10B, 34-43, 1975.
Aquino RP, Behar I, Biondi A, De Simone F, Scalesse G. Isolation of the principal sugars of Stevia rebaudiana. Boll Soc Ital Biol Sper, 61(9):1247-52, 1985.
Bridel
M, Lavielle R. Le principe a saveur sucree du Kaa'-he'-e (Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni). J Pharm Clin 14:99-154, 1931.
Crammer
B, Ikan R. Progress in the chemistry and properties of setvia ebaudioside; in Greenby TH (ed): Developments in Sweeteners. London, Elsevier, vol 3:45-64, 1987.
Curi
R, Alvarez M, Bazotte RB, Botion LM, Godoy JL, Bracht A. Effect of Stevia rebaudiana on glucose tolerance in normal adult humans. Braz J Med Biol Res 19(6):771-4, 1986. "It is generally accepted that the inhibition of gluconeogenesis is able to lead to hypoglycemia. Thus, some substances which inhibit gluconeogenesis are therapeutic to diabetes. It is possible that the stevia extract, by increasing the mitochondrial respiration rate and inhibiting the gluconeogenetic pathway, can indeed lead to hypoglycemia. Nevertheless, a possible effect of this plant on insulin secretion or peripheral action should be considered."
Das
S, Das AK, Murphy RA, Punwani IC, Nasution MP, Kinghorn AD. Evaluation of the cariogenic potential of the intense natural sweeteners stevia stevioside and rebaudioside A. Caries Res 26(5):363-6, 1992.
Kinghorn
AD, Soejarto DD, Nanzakkara NP, Compadre CM, Makapugay HC, Hovanec-Brown JM, Medon PJ, Kamath SK. A phytochemical screening procedure for sweet ent-kaurene glycosides in the genus Stevia. J Nat Prod 47(3):439-44, 1984.
Mauri
P, Catalano G, Gardana C, Peitta P. Analysis of stevia glycosides by capillary electrophoresis. Electrophoresis 17:367-371, 1996.
Melis
MS. Chronic administration of aqueous extract of Stevia rebaudiana in rats: renal effects. J Ethnopharmacol 47(3):129-34, 1995.
Melis
MS. A crude extract of Stevia rebaudiana increases the renal plasma flow of normal and hypertensive rats. Braz J Med Biol Res 29(5):660-75, 1996. Stevia extract, at doses higher than used for sweetening purposes, dilates blood vessels in animals who have either normal or high blood pressure.
Planas
Mazzei G, Kuc J. Contraceptive properties of Stevia rebaudiana. Science 162 (857):1007, Nov 29,1968. This study found a reduction in fertility in female rats given stevia decoction. According to the article, Paraguayan Matto Grosso Indian tribes have been known to drink stevia tea as a form of contraceptive. Later inquiries made in several locations in northeastern Paraguay did not confirm the use of stevia for contraceptive purposes (Soejarto, 1983).
Soejarto
DD. Potential sweetening agents of plant origin, field search for sweet-tasting Stevia spieces: Economic Botany 77, 1983.
Soejarto
D, Kinghorn AD, Farnsworth NR. Potential sweetening agents of plant origin. III. Organoleptic evaluation of Stevia leaf herbarium samples for sweetness. J Natural Products 45:590-99, 1982.
 

Nature’s No-Calorie Sweetener 
Stevia is a plant of the daisy family that grows naturally in South America. The plant, at its full maturity, reaches a height of close to three feet. The green leaves of this plant contain large amounts (up to 5 percent of dry weight) of stevioside, a sweetener estimated to be 300 times as sweet as table sugar. 


 Is Stevia Safe?

Stevia has been used as a sweetening ingredient in foods and drinks by South American natives for many centuries, and there is no report of any plant toxicity to the consumers. Stevia has been added to a number of food products in Japan since the mid 1970s. No indications of any significant side effects have yet been reported after more than two decades of use. Similarly, no reports of any adverse reactions to stevia have been reported in the United States.
 

Sugar substitute

Those who are novices at using stevia often make the mistake of using too much thinking they should use it as much as sugar. Stevia is 300 times sweeter than sugar, excessive amounts can lead to over-sweetness and an aftertaste. Generally, one teaspoon of stevia would be equivalent to one cup of sugar, while a quarter teaspoon would be equivalent to one tablespoon of sugar. Stevia is available in concentrated liquid form, and often two to four drops of the liquid extract added to tea or coffee is sufficient to sweeten the drink. Hopefully, with time, stevia can be added to a variety of sodas, candies, gums, and other foods in the US, just like it currently is in Japan and other countries. And we could see stevia packets at restaurants right along with the pink and blue artificial sweeteners.

 

For additional references, see The Stevia Cookbook.
Ray Sahelian, M.D. says, " I have used stevia daily for more than 10 years with absolutely no adverse effects. I spent long hours at the UCLA medical library while writing my book The Stevia Cookbook. I evaluated in detail all the published studies on stevia over the past few decades, and based on a thorough evaluation, I am confident to say that stevia, in my opinion, is safe and quite likely significantly safer than some of the artificial sweeteners currently on the market. Stevia has been given in massive doses to three generations of rodents with no harmful effects noted. Stevia has been used in Japan for more than 3 decades with no adverse reactions reported. It's too bad that more Americans have not heard of this amazing and safe sweetener. Those with diabetes can take stevia as a substitute for artificial sweeteners and sugar."

 

Q. Just wanted to let you know that I "met" you not too long ago by accident while attending the "University of Google" (you are familiar, right?) and I was so excited and impressed with all I read on your site, esp your story. You made me smile and you made me learn. Imagine my surprise today when I found that you know Donna Gates. I have been using her Body Ecology diet with much success for my autistic son for a few months. When your newsletter spoke of the Stevia Cookbook, I was suspect that you were a copycat of Donna Gates. and then, wow, it turns out you co-authored the book! So sorry for thinking evil of you for one split sec! We are trying to recover our 11 yo son from autism, and so, are very appreciative of all we can learn toward this goal. Thanks again for all you are doing to help so many.

 

I am so glad that I came across your youtube video about Stevia. I have been on saccharin and sucralose sweeteners for the past 10 years and I am horrified by the likelihood that they are ruining my health. I use sweeteners in my herbal teas because I find that teas of different herbs many times do not taste very nice if they are unsweetened.


Stevia Extract is available in 80% and 90% steviosides

See a video on You Tube about the benefits and dangers of this sweetener, see YouTube stevia sweetener